Time for Truth

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Time for Truth  (Read 142209 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #98 on: June 14, 2023, 01:29:48 AM »
HAHAHAHA There is also no evidence of a successful delivery.



JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #99 on: June 14, 2023, 01:44:00 AM »


JohnM

Wrong again. At best it's evidence of a very poor leap of faith based on no evidence whatsoever.

The mere fact that somebody is photographed holding a rifle doesn't mean he owns it, nor does it mean he received it in the mail.

Care to try again?
« Last Edit: June 14, 2023, 04:15:16 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #100 on: June 14, 2023, 01:44:29 AM »
Yes, if Oswald didn't receive his rifle then naturally he would complain and Kleins would be expected to have to some sort record of how they handled his non delivery but alas no evidence appears to exist. Meaning that Oswald's rifle was delivered.

But then you’re assuming that Oswald ever ordered a rifle.

I supposed you consider your imagination about what records would be kept to be evidence too. Everything that pops into your head is “evidence”.

Let see… if the postal service had shipped and delivered such a package they would be expected to have some sort of records of shipment and delivery. Meaning that it was never shipped and delivered.

Hoist by the petard of your own bad argument.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #101 on: June 14, 2023, 01:47:54 AM »

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #102 on: June 14, 2023, 04:48:22 AM »
Yes, if Oswald didn't receive his rifle then naturally he would complain and Kleins would be expected to have to some sort record of how they handled his non delivery but alas no evidence appears to exist. Meaning that Oswald's rifle was delivered.



JohnM

This is all just speculation. 

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #103 on: June 14, 2023, 05:20:50 AM »
This is all just speculation.

Sure, I was posed with a hypothetical scenario by Martin and speculated on how a non-delivery would be resolved but as we both know, the reality is that the rifle purchase was completed as proven by the Back yard photos.
Read the thread and learn how Martin desperately grasps at straws to keep the rifle out of Oswald's hands, it's all very strange.

JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #104 on: June 14, 2023, 05:48:29 AM »
Sure, I was posed with a hypothetical scenario by Martin and speculated on how a non-delivery would be resolved but as we both know, the reality is that the rifle purchase was completed as proven by the Back yard photos.
Read the thread and learn how Martin desperately grasps at straws to keep the rifle out of Oswald's hands, it's all very strange.

JohnM

I've known for some time now that you have great difficulty grasping even the most basic concepts, but this one is way out there.

A guy in a poor quality picture is holding a rifle and that's somehow proof that "the rifle purchase was completed"?

LOL