LNers Can't Explain the Two Back-of-Head Bullet Fragments

[Michael T. Griffith]

Dear Comrade Griffith,

Due in part to the severity of the consequences of being caught, which category of people is harder to "pull the wool" over:

1) People to help you assassinate and/or cover up the assassination of the President of the United States, or

2) People to help you pull off and/or cover up the Iran-Contra thingy?

-- Tom

Is this supposed to be your answer to the fact that the JFK autopsy skull x-rays show at least 2/3 of the right side of the brain to be missing but that the autopsy brain photos show, by Dr. Michael Baden's own admission, only 1-2 ounces of brain tissue missing? That's what you can charitably call a massive contradiction.

Again, how do you square the alleged brain photos with the fact that we know that pieces of JFK's brain were blown onto 16 surfaces?

As reminder: In 1975, Dr. Fred Hodges, then the chief of neuroradiology at the John Hopkins medical school, was asked to examine the JFK autopsy materials for the Rockefeller Commission. Among other things, he noted in his report that a "goodly portion" of the right brain was "missing":

AP and two lateral views show. . . . A goodly portion of the right brain is apparently missing
and the anterior part of the right cranial cavity contains air.
(https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=32027#relPageId=3, p. 2)

Dr. Hodges’ observation that in the skull x-rays “a goodly portion of the right brain is apparently missing” has been confirmed by Dr. Mantik, Dr. Chesser, and Dr. Aguilar. Dr. Mantik confirmed this both with direct analysis and with optical density measurements, determining that at least 2/3 of the right side of the brain is missing in the skull x-rays.

Further confirmation of a large amount of missing brain comes from a surprising source: Dr. James Humes. Humes admitted to JAMA that "two thirds of the right cerebrum had been blown away" (Journal of the American Medical Association, May 27, 1992, p. 2798).

Shall we talk about all the witnesses who saw JFK's brain before the autopsy and who said that 1/4 to 1/2 to 2/3 of it was gone, and about all the surfaces onto which bits of JFK's brain were blown? Let's do:

Francis O'Neill, one of the two FBI agents who attended the autopsy:

Parts of the brain were still within the cavity, but not much. The head wound was massive. It would seem that no one could survive such an injury. . . .
         
Humes pointed out a tracheostomy had been performed. He also pointed out to Sibert and myself the grave wound at the right rear of the President's head and the tremendous damage done to the brain therein.

From O'Neill's ARRB interview:
         
Mr. Gunn: Earlier in the deposition we referred to your observation of the brain being removed during the course of the autopsy. Do you recall that?         
Mr. O'Neill: Yes.         
Mr. O'Neill: [After some discussion about removal procedures] "... Now once again too this is just a portion of it [the brain] because the rest of it was--you know, really gone. And it was a very, very large portion of it. . . .           
Mr. Gunn: "Do you have any sense of what percentage of the brain was missing at the time it was removed from the cranium?         
Mr. O'Neill: . . . It was--Oh well, more than half of the brain was missing.

James Sibert, the other FBI agent who attended the autopsy:
         
A: I think part of the brain was missing, as I recall, or a statement to that effect was made--due to this explosion caused by the gunshot wound in the head.         
Q: Do you recall seeing. . . .?         
A: I certainly don’t recall seeing an intact brain, you know, like you see on a color photograph in med school or something like that.

Dr. Robert McClelland, one of the Parkland doctors, told the WC that at least a third of the brain had been blasted out:

You could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that probably a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar tissue, had been blasted out. There was a large amount of bleeding, which was occurring mainly from the large venous channel in the skull which had been blasted open.

According to the autopsy records, JFK's post-mortem brain weighed 1500 grams, about 150 grams more than the average male brain weighs. As mentioned, Baden told Bugliosi that JFK's brain was missing no more than 56 grams of tissue ("an ounce or two"). Baden did not explain how this could be when it is a matter of record that brain matter was splattered inside the limousine, on the back of the limousine, on Jackie's dress, on the follow-up car, and on two of the trailing patrolmen.

Below are additional eyewitnesses regarding the large amount of missing brain. Either these people were all amazingly "mistaken" or the autopsy brain photos are fraudulent. Note that their accounts consist of observations made at close range in the back seat of the limo, at Parkland Hospital, at the autopsy, and after the autopsy.

Floyd Riebe, who assisted John Stringer with taking photos at the autopsy, said that less than half the brain was present:

Q: Did you see the brain removed from President Kennedy?    
A: What little bit there was left, yes.            
Q: Were any photographs taken of the brain?            
A: I think I did some when they were putting it in that stainless steel pail.            
Q: When you say that there was not much left, what do you mean by that?            
A: Well, it was less than half of a brain there.

Secret Service agent Clint Hill repeatedly said part of the brain was gone and said there was a large wound in the right-rear part of the head. The following comes from Hill's 11/30/1963 report, in which he described what he saw at very close range for several minutes as he rode on top of the limousine’s back seat on the way to Parkland Hospital:

As I lay over the top of the back seat I noticed a portion of the President's head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely. Part of his brain was gone.

From Clint Hill's WC testimony:
         
Mr. SPECTER: What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
         
Mr. HILL: The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

When interviewed by CBS News in 2013, Hill repeated his account of seeing a large amount of missing brain:
         
Scott Pelley: What did you see?
         
Clint Hill: Brain matter, blood, bone fragments all come out of the wound.… Then Mrs. Kennedy came up on the trunk. She was trying to grab some of that material and pull it back with her.… I got a hold of her and I put her in the backseat. … And when I did that, his body fell to its left into her lap. His face--is head was in her lap.

The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see an area through the skull that there was no brain matter in that area at all. So I assumed it was a fatal wound.

Mortician Tom Robinson, who witnessed the autopsy and helped to reassemble JFK's skull after the autopsy, said that the amount of brain missing in the back of the head was about the size of a closed fist. A closed fist would be equal in size to at least one third of an average male brain. (The male brain is typically about 5.5 inches wide, 6.5 inches long, and 3.6 inches high.) From the ARRB meeting report on the interview with Robinson. From ARRB interview summary of Robinson's interview:

Robinson said that he saw the brain removed from President Kennedy's body and that a large percentage of it was gone "in the back," from the "medulla," and that the portion of the brain that was missing was about the size of a closed fist. He described the condition of the brain in this area as the consistency of "soup."

Gloria Knudsen, wife of White House photographer Robert Knudsen, who processed some of the autopsy photos, told the ARRB that her husband told her that JFK's brains were largely missing. From her ARRB interview summary:
         
Mrs. Gloria Knudsen said that her husband Robert had told her that . . . the President's brains were largely missing (blown out).

Now let's talk about all the surfaces that had brain matter splattered on them during the shooting:

Patrolman Bobby Hargis, who was riding closely behind and to the left of JFK’s limousine, said that when the explosive head shot occurred, he was "splattered with blood and brain":

Mr. HARGIS. Yes; when President Kennedy straightened back up in the car, the bullet hit him in the head, the one that killed him, and it seemed like his head exploded, and I was splattered with blood and brain, and kind of a bloody water.

Patrolman B. J. Martin, who was riding beside Hargis, said blood and "other matter" were splattered on his uniform, windshield, and motor:
         
Mr. BALL. What about your uniform?         
Mr. MARTIN. There was blood and matter on my left shoulder of my uniform.   
Mr. BALL. You pointed to a place in front of your shoulder, about the clavicle region?   
Mr. MARTIN. Yes, sir.   
Mr. BALL. Is that about where it was?   
Mr. MARTIN. Yes.   
Mr. BALL. On the front of your uniform and not on the side?   
Mr. MARTIN. No, sir.   
Mr. BALL. That would be left, was it?
Mr. MARTIN. Yes; on the left side.   
Mr. BALL. And just below the level of the shoulder?   
Mr. MARTIN. Yes, sir.   
Mr. BALL. And what spots were there?   
Mr. MARTIN. They were blood spots and other matter.
Mr. BALL. And what did you notice on your windshield?          
Mr. MARTIN. There was blood and other matter on my windshield and also on the motor.

Jack McNairy, who saw the limousine up-close at Parkland Hospital, said in a video-taped interview that there was "gray matter" splattered over a large part of the back seat:
         
As I looked around, I saw that there was gray matter splattered here [pointing to the inside of the rear passenger door to the right of JFK's seat] and along the back of the front seat.

Patrolman H. B. McClain, who helped Jackie get out of the limousine at Parkland Hospital, said in a video-taped interview that there was "matter" splattered all over the inside of the right-hand side of the car:

I could see what looked like a piece of skull, some hair, and matter splattered all over inside the car. It was all on the right-hand side of the car, except the part of the skull--it was laying right in the middle.

Secret Service agent Sam Kinney, who rode in the follow-up car, stated in a recorded interview with Vincent Palamara that brain matter splattered "all over" his windshield and arm:
         
The back of that Lincoln would be directly in front of me. Well, I had brain matter all over my windshield and arm. That's how close we were.

In 2003, Dr. Robert Grossman, one of the Parkland Hospital doctors, wrote that Jackie's dress was splattered with brain tissue and blood:
         
Her face was very white and she appeared to have been crying. She was wearing a light-colored dress. The lap of her dress was covered with blood and brain tissue.

Jackie Kennedy scooped up as much brain tissue as she could gather off the rear hood of the limo, brought it into the Parkland ER, and handed it to one of the medical staff in the room.

Dr. Marion T. Jenkins, one of the doctors who treated Kennedy at Parkland Hospital, reported that there were “fragmented sections of brain on the drapes of the emergency room cart.”

JFK's brain matter was splattered on 16 surfaces:

The back seat of JFK’s limousine.   
The right-rear passenger door of the limo.   
The trunk/rear hood of the limo.   
The front seat of the limo (per Roy Kellerman).   
Roy Kellerman's coat ("it was all over my coat").   
The back of William Greer's coat (per Greer himself, and per Kellerman).   
Governor Connally's clothes.   
Nellie Connally's clothes.   
Officer Martin's clothes.   
Officer Hargis's clothes.   
Officer Martin's motorcycle.   
Officer Hargis's motorcycle.   
Sam Kinney's clothes (riding in the follow-up car).   
The windshield of the follow-up car.   
The drapes of JFK’s emergency room cart.   
Jackie's dress (she said JFK's brains were "all over me").

You guys would have us believe that all this brain matter amounted to no more than 2 ounces, because that's what the autopsy brain photos show. But, clearly, the autopsy brain photos do not show JFK's brain.

Similarly, the claim that JFK's post-assassination brain weighed 1,500 grams is impossible. Even if we assume the brain was weighed after it had been fixed in formalin, the weight of 1,500 grams is still impossible. Fixing a brain in formalin may add about 100 grams of weight, but it may also reduce the weight by that amount. The average male human brain weighs about 1,350 grams. At the very least, giving every benefit of the doubt to the lone-gunman theory, one-fourth of JFK’s brain was blown out of the skull, but even that is far more than the amount of missing brain tissue seen in the alleged autopsy brain photos.

[Jack Nessan]

Is this supposed to be your answer to the fact that the JFK autopsy skull x-rays show at least 2/3 of the right side of the brain to be missing but that the autopsy brain photos show, by Dr. Michael Baden's own admission, only 1-2 ounces of brain tissue missing? That's what you can charitably call a massive contradiction.

Again, how do you square the alleged brain photos with the fact that we know that pieces of JFK's brain were blown onto 16 surfaces?

As reminder: In 1975, Dr. Fred Hodges, then the chief of neuroradiology at the John Hopkins medical school, was asked to examine the JFK autopsy materials for the Rockefeller Commission. Among other things, he noted in his report that a "goodly portion" of the right brain was "missing":

AP and two lateral views show. . . . A goodly portion of the right brain is apparently missing
and the anterior part of the right cranial cavity contains air.
(https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=32027#relPageId=3, p. 2)

Dr. Hodges’ observation that in the skull x-rays “a goodly portion of the right brain is apparently missing” has been confirmed by Dr. Mantik, Dr. Chesser, and Dr. Aguilar. Dr. Mantik confirmed this both with direct analysis and with optical density measurements, determining that at least 2/3 of the right side of the brain is missing in the skull x-rays.

Further confirmation of a large amount of missing brain comes from a surprising source: Dr. James Humes. Humes admitted to JAMA that "two thirds of the right cerebrum had been blown away" (Journal of the American Medical Association, May 27, 1992, p. 2798).

Shall we talk about all the witnesses who saw JFK's brain before the autopsy and who said that 1/4 to 1/2 to 2/3 of it was gone, and about all the surfaces onto which bits of JFK's brain were blown? Let's do:

Francis O'Neill, one of the two FBI agents who attended the autopsy:

Parts of the brain were still within the cavity, but not much. The head wound was massive. It would seem that no one could survive such an injury. . . .
         
Humes pointed out a tracheostomy had been performed. He also pointed out to Sibert and myself the grave wound at the right rear of the President's head and the tremendous damage done to the brain therein.

From O'Neill's ARRB interview:
         
Mr. Gunn: Earlier in the deposition we referred to your observation of the brain being removed during the course of the autopsy. Do you recall that?         
Mr. O'Neill: Yes.         
Mr. O'Neill: [After some discussion about removal procedures] "... Now once again too this is just a portion of it [the brain] because the rest of it was--you know, really gone. And it was a very, very large portion of it. . . .           
Mr. Gunn: "Do you have any sense of what percentage of the brain was missing at the time it was removed from the cranium?         
Mr. O'Neill: . . . It was--Oh well, more than half of the brain was missing.

James Sibert, the other FBI agent who attended the autopsy:
         
A: I think part of the brain was missing, as I recall, or a statement to that effect was made--due to this explosion caused by the gunshot wound in the head.         
Q: Do you recall seeing. . . .?         
A: I certainly don’t recall seeing an intact brain, you know, like you see on a color photograph in med school or something like that.

Dr. Robert McClelland, one of the Parkland doctors, told the WC that at least a third of the brain had been blasted out:

You could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that probably a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar tissue, had been blasted out. There was a large amount of bleeding, which was occurring mainly from the large venous channel in the skull which had been blasted open.

According to the autopsy records, JFK's post-mortem brain weighed 1500 grams, about 150 grams more than the average male brain weighs. As mentioned, Baden told Bugliosi that JFK's brain was missing no more than 56 grams of tissue ("an ounce or two"). Baden did not explain how this could be when it is a matter of record that brain matter was splattered inside the limousine, on the back of the limousine, on Jackie's dress, on the follow-up car, and on two of the trailing patrolmen.

Below are additional eyewitnesses regarding the large amount of missing brain. Either these people were all amazingly "mistaken" or the autopsy brain photos are fraudulent. Note that their accounts consist of observations made at close range in the back seat of the limo, at Parkland Hospital, at the autopsy, and after the autopsy.

Floyd Riebe, who assisted John Stringer with taking photos at the autopsy, said that less than half the brain was present:

Q: Did you see the brain removed from President Kennedy?    
A: What little bit there was left, yes.            
Q: Were any photographs taken of the brain?            
A: I think I did some when they were putting it in that stainless steel pail.            
Q: When you say that there was not much left, what do you mean by that?            
A: Well, it was less than half of a brain there.

Secret Service agent Clint Hill repeatedly said part of the brain was gone and said there was a large wound in the right-rear part of the head. The following comes from Hill's 11/30/1963 report, in which he described what he saw at very close range for several minutes as he rode on top of the limousine’s back seat on the way to Parkland Hospital:

As I lay over the top of the back seat I noticed a portion of the President's head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely. Part of his brain was gone.

From Clint Hill's WC testimony:
         
Mr. SPECTER: What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
         
Mr. HILL: The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

When interviewed by CBS News in 2013, Hill repeated his account of seeing a large amount of missing brain:
         
Scott Pelley: What did you see?
         
Clint Hill: Brain matter, blood, bone fragments all come out of the wound.… Then Mrs. Kennedy came up on the trunk. She was trying to grab some of that material and pull it back with her.… I got a hold of her and I put her in the backseat. … And when I did that, his body fell to its left into her lap. His face--is head was in her lap.

The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see an area through the skull that there was no brain matter in that area at all. So I assumed it was a fatal wound.

Mortician Tom Robinson, who witnessed the autopsy and helped to reassemble JFK's skull after the autopsy, said that the amount of brain missing in the back of the head was about the size of a closed fist. A closed fist would be equal in size to at least one third of an average male brain. (The male brain is typically about 5.5 inches wide, 6.5 inches long, and 3.6 inches high.) From the ARRB meeting report on the interview with Robinson. From ARRB interview summary of Robinson's interview:

Robinson said that he saw the brain removed from President Kennedy's body and that a large percentage of it was gone "in the back," from the "medulla," and that the portion of the brain that was missing was about the size of a closed fist. He described the condition of the brain in this area as the consistency of "soup."

Gloria Knudsen, wife of White House photographer Robert Knudsen, who processed some of the autopsy photos, told the ARRB that her husband told her that JFK's brains were largely missing. From her ARRB interview summary:
         
Mrs. Gloria Knudsen said that her husband Robert had told her that . . . the President's brains were largely missing (blown out).

Now let's talk about all the surfaces that had brain matter splattered on them during the shooting:

Patrolman Bobby Hargis, who was riding closely behind and to the left of JFK’s limousine, said that when the explosive head shot occurred, he was "splattered with blood and brain":

Mr. HARGIS. Yes; when President Kennedy straightened back up in the car, the bullet hit him in the head, the one that killed him, and it seemed like his head exploded, and I was splattered with blood and brain, and kind of a bloody water.

Patrolman B. J. Martin, who was riding beside Hargis, said blood and "other matter" were splattered on his uniform, windshield, and motor:
         
Mr. BALL. What about your uniform?         
Mr. MARTIN. There was blood and matter on my left shoulder of my uniform.   
Mr. BALL. You pointed to a place in front of your shoulder, about the clavicle region?   
Mr. MARTIN. Yes, sir.   
Mr. BALL. Is that about where it was?   
Mr. MARTIN. Yes.   
Mr. BALL. On the front of your uniform and not on the side?   
Mr. MARTIN. No, sir.   
Mr. BALL. That would be left, was it?
Mr. MARTIN. Yes; on the left side.   
Mr. BALL. And just below the level of the shoulder?   
Mr. MARTIN. Yes, sir.   
Mr. BALL. And what spots were there?   
Mr. MARTIN. They were blood spots and other matter.
Mr. BALL. And what did you notice on your windshield?          
Mr. MARTIN. There was blood and other matter on my windshield and also on the motor.

Jack McNairy, who saw the limousine up-close at Parkland Hospital, said in a video-taped interview that there was "gray matter" splattered over a large part of the back seat:
         
As I looked around, I saw that there was gray matter splattered here [pointing to the inside of the rear passenger door to the right of JFK's seat] and along the back of the front seat.

Patrolman H. B. McClain, who helped Jackie get out of the limousine at Parkland Hospital, said in a video-taped interview that there was "matter" splattered all over the inside of the right-hand side of the car:

I could see what looked like a piece of skull, some hair, and matter splattered all over inside the car. It was all on the right-hand side of the car, except the part of the skull--it was laying right in the middle.

Secret Service agent Sam Kinney, who rode in the follow-up car, stated in a recorded interview with Vincent Palamara that brain matter splattered "all over" his windshield and arm:
         
The back of that Lincoln would be directly in front of me. Well, I had brain matter all over my windshield and arm. That's how close we were.

In 2003, Dr. Robert Grossman, one of the Parkland Hospital doctors, wrote that Jackie's dress was splattered with brain tissue and blood:
         
Her face was very white and she appeared to have been crying. She was wearing a light-colored dress. The lap of her dress was covered with blood and brain tissue.

Jackie Kennedy scooped up as much brain tissue as she could gather off the rear hood of the limo, brought it into the Parkland ER, and handed it to one of the medical staff in the room.

Dr. Marion T. Jenkins, one of the doctors who treated Kennedy at Parkland Hospital, reported that there were “fragmented sections of brain on the drapes of the emergency room cart.”

JFK's brain matter was splattered on 16 surfaces:

The back seat of JFK’s limousine.   
The right-rear passenger door of the limo.   
The trunk/rear hood of the limo.   
The front seat of the limo (per Roy Kellerman).   
Roy Kellerman's coat ("it was all over my coat").   
The back of William Greer's coat (per Greer himself, and per Kellerman).   
Governor Connally's clothes.   
Nellie Connally's clothes.   
Officer Martin's clothes.   
Officer Hargis's clothes.   
Officer Martin's motorcycle.   
Officer Hargis's motorcycle.   
Sam Kinney's clothes (riding in the follow-up car).   
The windshield of the follow-up car.   
The drapes of JFK’s emergency room cart.   
Jackie's dress (she said JFK's brains were "all over me").

You guys would have us believe that all this brain matter amounted to no more than 2 ounces, because that's what the autopsy brain photos show. But, clearly, the autopsy brain photos do not show JFK's brain.

Similarly, the claim that JFK's post-assassination brain weighed 1,500 grams is impossible. Even if we assume the brain was weighed after it had been fixed in formalin, the weight of 1,500 grams is still impossible. Fixing a brain in formalin may add about 100 grams of weight, but it may also reduce the weight by that amount. The average male human brain weighs about 1,350 grams. At the very least, giving every benefit of the doubt to the lone-gunman theory, one-fourth of JFK’s brain was blown out of the skull, but even that is far more than the amount of missing brain tissue seen in the alleged autopsy brain photos.

Wow, what an impressive post. Really lengthy but full of nothing but opinion. Not a fact anywhere to be found.

The only thing people see is the top of the right hand side of his brain and that is enough to make wild unfounded claims? Seems about right, the unfounded part anyway.

[Michael T. Griffith]

Wow, what an impressive post. Really lengthy but full of nothing but opinion. Not a fact anywhere to be found.

The only thing people see is the top of the right hand side of his brain and that is enough to make wild unfounded claims? Seems about right, the unfounded part anyway.

What a joke. The OD measurements are not "opinion." Humes himself admitted that 2/3 of the right cerebrum were blown away, which agrees with the OD measurements of the skull x-rays.

Mortician Tom Robinson handled the skull and saw the brain and said that a fist-sized chunk of brain matter was missing from the brain. He wasn't giving his "opinion" but was describing what he saw and experienced. I guess he was just hallucinating, hey?

The people who saw and described brain matter being splattered onto numerous surfaces were not giving "opinion" but were relating what they saw and experienced--unless you're going to argue they were all hallucinating or fabricating.

And, FYI, the witnesses did not just see the top of the right-hand side of the brain. Robinson saw no large wound on the top of the head, only in the back of the head, and he helped fill the wound with a rubber covering. The other morticians also saw a large back-of-head wound. The Parkland nurses who cleaned the head wound, packed it with gauze, and wrapped the head in a sheet said the large wound was in the back of the head, not on top of the head. Clint Hill got a prolonged look at the head wound from 3 feet away on the way to Parkland, and then saw the wound again at Bethesda, and he wrote in his report that the wound was in the right-rear part of the head, just as dozens of other witnesses said.

And, again, Humes himself said that 2/3 of the right cerebrum was blown away, and multiple OD measurements confirm that the x-rays show at least 2/3 of the right brain to be missing.

What do you have against science and hard evidence? Why do you keep repeating claims that have been debunked for decades now?

[Jack Nessan]

What a joke. The OD measurements are not "opinion." Humes himself admitted that 2/3 of the right cerebrum were blown away, which agrees with the OD measurements of the skull x-rays.

Mortician Tom Robinson handled the skull and saw the brain and said that a fist-sized chunk of brain matter was missing from the brain. He wasn't giving his "opinion" but was describing what he saw and experienced. I guess he was just hallucinating, hey?

The people who saw and described brain matter being splattered onto numerous surfaces were not giving "opinion" but were relating what they saw and experienced--unless you're going to argue they were all hallucinating or fabricating.

And, FYI, the witnesses did not just see the top of the right-hand side of the brain. Robinson saw no large wound on the top of the head, only in the back of the head, and he helped fill the wound with a rubber covering. The other morticians also saw a large back-of-head wound. The Parkland nurses who cleaned the head wound, packed it with gauze, and wrapped the head in a sheet said the large wound was in the back of the head, not on top of the head. Clint Hill got a prolonged look at the head wound from 3 feet away on the way to Parkland, and then saw the wound again at Bethesda, and he wrote in his report that the wound was in the right-rear part of the head, just as dozens of other witnesses said.

And, again, Humes himself said that 2/3 of the right cerebrum was blown away, and multiple OD measurements confirm that the x-rays show at least 2/3 of the right brain to be missing.

What do you have against science and hard evidence? Why do you keep repeating claims that have been debunked for decades now?

You have gone off the rails this time. Nothing but wild unfounded Michael statements:

MG “And, FYI, the witnesses did not just see the top of the right-hand side of the brain. Robinson saw no large wound on the top of the head, only in the back of the head,”

MG “Humes himself admitted that 2/3 of the right cerebrum were blown away,”

Humes did not make this claim to the WC. He did talk about the damage to the parietal lobe.

Humes.... “The area in which the greatest loss of brain substance was particularly in the parietal lobe, which is the major portion of the right cerebral hemisphere.”

That is a long way from a claim of 2/3rd of the brain. The parietal lobe he is talking about is not the right cerebral hemisphere but a portion of a section of it.

-------------------

The Autopsy photos themselves show an almost intact brain. At least according to you in a 12/21/23 post

MGrififith 12/21/23

MG--“Yet, the autopsy brain photos show a virtually intact brain with no more than 1-2 ounces of tissue missing, as even Vince Bugliosi and Michael Baden gladly acknowledged and insisted. “

MG--"Even the ARRB's forensic radiologist, Dr. John Fitzpatrick, who was loathe to see any evidence of fraud in the autopsy materials, said that the upper-right dark region on the AP x-ray indicates "some absence of brain" (Meeting Report: Independent Review of JFK Autopsy X-Rays and Photographs By Outside Consultant, 2/9/96, ARRB, p. 1)."

“Some absence of brain.”[/b] --That statement means 2/3 of the right side of his brain to you?

MG “The people who saw and described brain matter being splattered onto numerous surfaces were not giving "opinion" but were relating what they saw and experienced--unless you're going to argue they were all hallucinating or fabricating.”

We all have seen it. It is called the Zapruder Film or Muchmore Film


MG “the large wound was in the back of the head,”

You are the only one making that claim. The wound was in the right side of the head.

Commander HUMES ....The third obvious wound at the time of the examination was a huge defect over the right side of the skull. This defect involved both the scalp and the underlying skull, and from the brain substance was protruding.

-----------------------

They did look at the brain from the top of the head.

Humes.... We had to do virtually no work with a saw to remove these Portions of the skull, they came apart in our hands very easily, and we attempted to further examine the brain

Humes...... When viewed from above the left cerebral hemisphere was intact. 

[Michael T. Griffith]

You have gone off the rails this time. Nothing but wild unfounded Michael statements:

Read: I presented powerful evidence that you can't explain but must lamely dismiss as either fabricated or hallucinated.

Your post is another amazing example of your impressive ability to ignore contrary evidence and to seemingly pretend not not grasp the implication and importance of key evidence.

Let's begin.

MG “And, FYI, the witnesses did not just see the top of the right-hand side of the brain. Robinson saw no large wound on the top of the head, only in the back of the head,”

MG “Humes himself admitted that 2/3 of the right cerebrum were blown away,”

Humes did not make this claim to the WC. He did talk about the damage to the parietal lobe. “The area in which the greatest loss of brain substance was particularly in the parietal lobe, which is the major portion of the right cerebral hemisphere.” That is a long way from a claim of 2/3rd of the brain. The parietal lobe he is talking about is not the right cerebral hemisphere but a portion of a section of it.

Oh, so you'll only trust Humes when he was in full cover-up mode in 1964?

What about the fact that Dr. Fred Hodges corroborated Humes' JAMA admission? In 1975, Hodges, then the chief of neuroradiology at the John Hopkins medical school, was asked to examine the JFK autopsy materials for the Rockefeller Commission. Among other things, he noted in his report that a "goodly portion" of the right brain was "missing":

AP and two lateral views show. . . . A goodly portion of the right brain is apparently missing
and the anterior part of the right cranial cavity contains air.
(https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=32027#relPageId=3, p. 2)

What about the fact that OD measurements confirm Humes' JAMA admission? 

The Autopsy photos themselves show an almost intact brain. At least according to you in a 12/21/23 post.

LOL! Umm, yes, I've repeatedly said that the autopsy brain photos show a virtually intact brain, a brain with virtually no tissue missing. That's why we know their fake, because we know from multiple OD measurements of the skull x-rays that those x-rays prove that about 2/3 of the right side of the brain was missing, because we have numerous eyewitness accounts that a substantial part of the brain (1/4 to 3/4) was missing, and because we know that a huge amount of brain matter was blown out of the skull and splattered onto at least 16 surfaces.

MGrififith 12/21/23

MG--“Yet, the autopsy brain photos show a virtually intact brain with no more than 1-2 ounces of tissue missing, as even Vince Bugliosi and Michael Baden gladly acknowledged and insisted.“

Yup! See above. Do you really not grasp the point about why the autopsy brain photos abjectly cannot be photos of JFK's brain?

MG--"Even the ARRB's forensic radiologist, Dr. John Fitzpatrick, who was loathe to see any evidence of fraud in the autopsy materials, said that the upper-right dark region on the AP x-ray indicates "some absence of brain" (Meeting Report: Independent Review of JFK Autopsy X-Rays and Photographs By Outside Consultant, 2/9/96, ARRB, p. 1)."[/b]

“Some absence of brain.”[/b] --That statement means 2/3 of the right side of his brain to you?

Humm, does "some" mean only 1-2 ounces of missing brain to you?

Did you notice that Fitzpatrick was only talking about the dark region in the upper-right part of the AP x-ray, not the entire x-ray, and not the entire brain?  The fact that he acknowledged that some of the brain in the dark area is missing is further proof that more than 1-2 ounces of brain were blown from JFK's skull--again, unless you interpret some to mean only 1-2 ounces.

MG “The people who saw and described brain matter being splattered onto numerous surfaces were not giving "opinion" but were relating what they saw and experienced--unless you're going to argue they were all hallucinating or fabricating.”

We all have seen it. It is called the Zapruder Film or Muchmore Film.

Oh, you nailed it! Okay, then how can you argue with a straight face that the brain photos are genuine, since we all agree they only show 1-2 ounces of brain tissue missing? I sometimes get the impression that you lose track of your own arguments.

MG “the large wound was in the back of the head,”

You are the only one making that claim. The wound was in the right side of the head.

I'm the only one "making that claim"?! Umm, no, here are some of the witnesses who said they saw a large wound in the back of the head: Tom Robinson, Clint Hill, Nurse Diana Bowron, Nurse Margaret Henchliffe, Francis O'Neill, James Sibert, Dr. Robert Karnei, Dr. Kemp Clark, Dr. Charles Baxter, Dr. Marion Jenkins, Edward Reed, Jan Gail Rudnicki, Dr. Ronald Jones, Dr. Gene Akin, Dr. Paul Peters, Nurse Patricia Hutton, Dr. Charles Carrico, Aubrey Rike, Dr. Robert Grossman, Dr. Richard Dulaney, Dr. Fouad Bashour, and Nurse Doris Nelson. Again, these are just some of the witnesses who saw a large back-of-head wound.

And your argument is that all of these people, and many others, just could not tell the difference between a large wound above the right ear and a large wound in the back of the head.

Commander HUMES ....The third obvious wound at the time of the examination was a huge defect over the right side of the skull. This defect involved both the scalp and the underlying skull, and from the brain substance was protruding.

Ah, yes, you're quoting Humes when he was in full cover-up mode. Now, how do you suppose that dozens of other witnesses missed seeing a large wound above the right ear? How did the morticians miss it? How did the nurses who cleaned the large head wound and packed it with gauze miss it? How could those nurses have confused a large wound above the right ear for a wound in the back of the head, for a wound that included part of the right occipital bone? 

They did look at the brain from the top of the head.

Humes.... We had to do virtually no work with a saw to remove these Portions of the skull, they came apart in our hands very easily, and we attempted to further examine the brain. . . . When viewed from above the left cerebral hemisphere was intact.

Are you perhaps living in the 1970s and are somehow able to post in this forum from your alternate reality? Tom Robinson explained that the top-of-head damage was not there originally but was done by the autopsy doctors. Have you not read any of the ARRB-released documents and interviews?

Before the autopsy, before the autopsy doctors made an opening in the top of the head, the witnesses who saw the head would have seen it through the large right-rear head wound. AGAIN:

Secret Service agent Clint Hill repeatedly said part of the brain was gone and said there was a large wound in the right-rear part of the head. The following comes from Hill's 11/30/1963 report, in which he described what he saw at very close range for several minutes as he rode on top of the limousine’s back seat on the way to Parkland Hospital:

As I lay over the top of the back seat I noticed a portion of the President's head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely. Part of his brain was gone.

From Clint Hill's WC testimony:
         
Mr. SPECTER: What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
         
Mr. HILL: The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

When interviewed by CBS News in 2013, Hill repeated his account of seeing a large amount of missing brain:
         
Scott Pelley: What did you see?
         
Clint Hill: Brain matter, blood, bone fragments all come out of the wound.… Then Mrs. Kennedy came up on the trunk. She was trying to grab some of that material and pull it back with her.… I got a hold of her and I put her in the backseat. … And when I did that, his body fell to its left into her lap. His face--is head was in her lap.

The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see an area through the skull that there was no brain matter in that area at all. So I assumed it was a fatal wound.

[Jack Nessan]

Read: I presented powerful evidence that you can't explain but must lamely dismiss as either fabricated or hallucinated.

Your post is another amazing example of your impressive ability to ignore contrary evidence and to seemingly pretend not not grasp the implication and importance of key evidence.

Let's begin.

Oh, so you'll only trust Humes when he was in full cover-up mode in 1964?

What about the fact that Dr. Fred Hodges corroborated Humes' JAMA admission? In 1975, Hodges, then the chief of neuroradiology at the John Hopkins medical school, was asked to examine the JFK autopsy materials for the Rockefeller Commission. Among other things, he noted in his report that a "goodly portion" of the right brain was "missing":

AP and two lateral views show. . . . A goodly portion of the right brain is apparently missing
and the anterior part of the right cranial cavity contains air.
(https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=32027#relPageId=3, p. 2)

What about the fact that OD measurements confirm Humes' JAMA admission? 

LOL! Umm, yes, I've repeatedly said that the autopsy brain photos show a virtually intact brain, a brain with virtually no tissue missing. That's why we know their fake, because we know from multiple OD measurements of the skull x-rays that those x-rays prove that about 2/3 of the right side of the brain was missing, because we have numerous eyewitness accounts that a substantial part of the brain (1/4 to 3/4) was missing, and because we know that a huge amount of brain matter was blown out of the skull and splattered onto at least 16 surfaces.

Yup! See above. Do you really not grasp the point about why the autopsy brain photos abjectly cannot be photos of JFK's brain?

Humm, does "some" mean only 1-2 ounces of missing brain to you?

Did you notice that Fitzpatrick was only talking about the dark region in the upper-right part of the AP x-ray, not the entire x-ray, and not the entire brain?  The fact that he acknowledged that some of the brain in the dark area is missing is further proof that more than 1-2 ounces of brain were blown from JFK's skull--again, unless you interpret some to mean only 1-2 ounces.

Oh, you nailed it! Okay, then how can you argue with a straight face that the brain photos are genuine, since we all agree they only show 1-2 ounces of brain tissue missing? I sometimes get the impression that you lose track of your own arguments.

I'm the only one "making that claim"?! Umm, no, here are some of the witnesses who said they saw a large wound in the back of the head: Tom Robinson, Clint Hill, Nurse Diana Bowron, Nurse Margaret Henchliffe, Francis O'Neill, James Sibert, Dr. Robert Karnei, Dr. Kemp Clark, Dr. Charles Baxter, Dr. Marion Jenkins, Edward Reed, Jan Gail Rudnicki, Dr. Ronald Jones, Dr. Gene Akin, Dr. Paul Peters, Nurse Patricia Hutton, Dr. Charles Carrico, Aubrey Rike, Dr. Robert Grossman, Dr. Richard Dulaney, Dr. Fouad Bashour, and Nurse Doris Nelson. Again, these are just some of the witnesses who saw a large back-of-head wound.

And your argument is that all of these people, and many others, just could not tell the difference between a large wound above the right ear and a large wound in the back of the head.

Ah, yes, you're quoting Humes when he was in full cover-up mode. Now, how do you suppose that dozens of other witnesses missed seeing a large wound above the right ear? How did the morticians miss it? How did the nurses who cleaned the large head wound and packed it with gauze miss it? How could those nurses have confused a large wound above the right ear for a wound in the back of the head, for a wound that included part of the right occipital bone? 

Are you perhaps living in the 1970s and are somehow able to post in this forum from your alternate reality? Tom Robinson explained that the top-of-head damage was not there originally but was done by the autopsy doctors. Have you not read any of the ARRB-released documents and interviews?

Before the autopsy, before the autopsy doctors made an opening in the top of the head, the witnesses who saw the head would have seen it through the large right-rear head wound. AGAIN:

Secret Service agent Clint Hill repeatedly said part of the brain was gone and said there was a large wound in the right-rear part of the head. The following comes from Hill's 11/30/1963 report, in which he described what he saw at very close range for several minutes as he rode on top of the limousine’s back seat on the way to Parkland Hospital:

As I lay over the top of the back seat I noticed a portion of the President's head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely. Part of his brain was gone.

From Clint Hill's WC testimony:
         
Mr. SPECTER: What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
         
Mr. HILL: The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

When interviewed by CBS News in 2013, Hill repeated his account of seeing a large amount of missing brain:
         
Scott Pelley: What did you see?
         
Clint Hill: Brain matter, blood, bone fragments all come out of the wound.… Then Mrs. Kennedy came up on the trunk. She was trying to grab some of that material and pull it back with her.… I got a hold of her and I put her in the backseat. … And when I did that, his body fell to its left into her lap. His face--is head was in her lap.

The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see an area through the skull that there was no brain matter in that area at all. So I assumed it was a fatal wound.

Were you not aware there are autopsy photos of JFK? They clearly show everything you have posted is wrong. Everything. Not one thing you have posted is correct.