So is it reasonably to conclude that it was NOT probable that Weitzman could have seen even a portion of the rifle while looking under the flat (pallet)?
If so then Weitzman is exaggerating similar to Roger Craig or Weitzman saw the rifle originally in a different place than where Boone claims to have first seen it.
Seems to be a choice as to whom
Is the more credible witness, Weitzman or Boone?
Since Weitzman seems to have had some problem with depression later in his life, should this be considered as a sign he saw the rifle moved and remained silent about it? Or is it because he had exaggerated about actually seeing the rifle at the DAME time as Boone did?
This is just one example why I’m still having trouble deciding what is true and what is not after 20 years of following the discussions about the JFK assassination.