Lee Oswald--- The biggest "Red Herring" in American history!

[Sean Kneringer]

Where is the date on the photo?    Tress in full leaf in March?

March 16th, to be exact. And notice the "Carraway" sign above the entrance. That alone tells you it's well before the assassination.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth618976/m1/1/

[Walt Cakebread]

March 16th, to be exact. And notice the "Carraway" sign above the entrance. That alone tells you it's well before the assassination.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth618976/m1/1/

I don't doubt that the photo was taken prior to 1//22/63.....  ( the latticed brickwork has not yet been erected in front of the TSBD windows ) but that doesn't mean that the photo is authentic.  Photos are altered all of the time ....

[John Mytton]

I don't doubt that the photo was taken prior to 1//22/63.....  ( the latticed brickwork has not yet been erected in front of the TSBD windows ) but that doesn't mean that the photo is authentic.  Photos are altered all of the time ....

Photos are altered all of the time ....

In every topic this happens CT's demand evidence and when evidence is provided;
photos are altered all the time,
cops always lie, remember George Floyd,
Lineups are unreliable,
Eyewitness testimony can/can't be relied upon,
The FBI can't be trusted because of Hoover.
The FBI forensic experts can be trusted, just because,
Marina lied except when she didn't,
The Autopsy doctors lied except when they don't.
Yawn.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Not nearly as often as the “Oswald did it” faithful rattling off a list of claims based on speculation and calling it “evidence”.

[Richard Smith]

In every topic this happens CT's demand evidence and when evidence is provided;
photos are altered all the time,
cops always lie, remember George Floyd,
Lineups are unreliable,
Eyewitness testimony can/can't be relied upon,
The FBI can't be trusted because of Hoover.
The FBI forensic experts can be trusted, just because,
Marina lied except when she didn't,
The Autopsy doctors lied except when they don't.
Yawn.

JohnM

It is the endless Catch 22 of lunacy.  A CTer makes a baseless and absurd claim.  When this is pointed out to them, they request evidence to rebut their claim.  When that is provided, they reject the evidence as faked (without providing a scintilla of evidence that it is faked much less who and how it was faked).  Even if the evidence preexisted the assassination by years or even decades it is deemed suspect.  The baseless claim is then repeated impervious to facts, common sense, evidence, or logical inference.

[John Iacoletti]

Pot, kettle

The “Oswald did it” faithful also say that witnesses lied except when they didn’t, that a forensic pathology expert can’t be trusted, just because, and that eyewitness testimony can’t be relied on, etc, when it serves their purposes.

[Walt Cakebread]

It is the endless Catch 22 of lunacy.  A CTer makes a baseless and absurd claim.  When this is pointed out to them, they request evidence to rebut their claim.  When that is provided, they reject the evidence as faked (without providing a scintilla of evidence that it is faked much less who and how it was faked).  Even if the evidence preexisted the assassination by years or even decades it is deemed suspect.  The baseless claim is then repeated impervious to facts, common sense, evidence, or logical inference.

Common sense!.....  Something you lack.