The problem remains that it’s still unlikely that Ukraine wins the war despite all the help they’ve been given.
If a year from now, Russia still occupies 1/5 of Ukraine, what should Ukraine’s backers like the US do? Double-down, escalate, or de-escalate?
The problem remains that it’s still unlikely that Ukraine wins the war despite all the help they’ve been given.When they force the Russians out of their country, they'll have won the war. With all the new equipment they have been getting and the desperate state of the Russia army it is most certainly possible to send Putin packing.
If a year from now, Russia still occupies 1/5 of Ukraine, what should Ukraine’s backers like the US do? Double-down, escalate, or de-escalate?Russia won't occupy 1/5 of Ukraine, but just in case they somehow manage to do so, what would you prefer Ukraine's backers do; continue to support their efforts or withdraw all funding and leave Ukraine to it's own devices so that Putin can kill even more civilians than he has already done?
You seem to be arguing that Ukraine should just give up a part of their country and award Putin for his aggression and many war crimes. Do you think rewarding aggressors is a good thing?