Simple proof that the Zapruder film is 100% Authentic!

[Ray Mitcham]

I wish there was an appropriate pareidolia thread in the audiovisual forum for Maxwell to post in.

\

F.G.S don't mention pareidoyleia on here again.

[Jake Maxwell]

You really need to have a break.

I know… On my phone it cannot be seen… On my computer… it is there… I almost didn’t post this one… I will remove it.. I know this can be frustrating…
But the image in Geraldo’s Vault HD Zapruder (gif below) is clear enough… the faint image in NIX… is likely a Stetson… but needs a good set-up to see it… All good…

Below is what everyone needs to see...

[Jake Maxwell]

Anthony Davison’s work is good... but it does not address anomalies in the background... that cannot be explained by Zapruder getting the jitters, etc...
This is what I think demands an explanation...
Look at the two frames from an 1) HD slo-mo version... and from 2) Geraldo’s 1975 first public showing of Zapruder...
NOTE: How little the limo moves forward... and how FAST the background shifts...
How is this best explained?

[John Mytton]

Anthony Davison’s work is good... but it does not address anomalies in the background... that cannot be explained by Zapruder getting the jitters, etc...
This is what I think demands an explanation...
Look at the two frames from an 1) HD slo-mo version... and from 2) Geraldo’s 1975 first public showing of Zapruder...
NOTE: How little the limo moves forward... and how FAST the background shifts...
How is this best explained?

JohnM

[Jake Maxwell]

Yes...
Does this mean that several frames of the wall across the street are missing, never seen?

[John Mytton]

Yes...
Does this mean that several frames of the wall across the street are missing, never seen?

Life Magazine damaged their copy of the film which is probably the original source of of the two clips you posted. But the original Zapruder in camera version has been transferred and that's why we don't see the big jump as in your version and the unedited Zapruder film is what seen in Anthony's video.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Life Magazine damaged their copy of the film which is probably the original source of of the two clips you posted. But the original Zapruder in camera version has been transferred and that's why we don't see the big jump as in your version and the unedited Zapruder film is what seen in Anthony's video.

JohnM

Life Magazine damaged their copy of the film which is probably the original source of of the two clips you posted.

Sure they did. And the FBI accidentally damaged a photo of a man in the 6th floor window and the original Nix film was lost as was Mary Moorman's photo of the TSBD, taken just before the first shot, and, for some unknown reason the FBI "lost" the original Klein's' microfilm. It's all a coincidence, I'm sure....