Conclusions or assumptions

[John Iacoletti]

When the Report has no real proof of anything, the word 'probably' is used.

a-yup.

[Jerry Freeman]

There is more than enough reasoning to come to the conclusion that Oswald was guilty.

You base your conclusion on feeling and not facts based on logic and research.

You don't need physical hard evidence to see that.

How would you like to be imprisoned or hung based on lack of evidence?

Going a bit off subject but Charles Manson was convicted (and rightly so I believe) of the Tate and LaBianca murders without even being at the murder scene or committing the murders himself. But with the amount circumstantial evidence and testimony against him he was convicted.

Not too far off subject it would seem as none other than Vincent Bugliosi [Reclaiming History] was the prosecuting DA. 
 

The Manson murder trial was the longest murder trial in American history when it occurred, lasting nine and a half months. The trial was among the most publicized American criminal cases of the twentieth century and was dubbed the "trial of the century". The jury had been sequestered for 225 days, longer than any jury before it. The trial transcript alone ran to 209 volumes or 31,716 pages.[88]

Wiki

Manson is dead and undoubtedly will rot in hell. Oswald was denied his right to a defense.

[Jerry Freeman]

Says the guy who forgot his helmet

Says the guy who can't stop polishing his

[Jerry Freeman]

This past weekend...a terrorist named Akram invaded a synagogue in a Dallas suburb and held four worshipers hostage with a gun.
Some 200 federal, state and local agents arrived on the *scene.
Where this gun came from still remains a mystery unlike the supposed rifle mentioned above that was allegedly located with prompt expedience the very same day of a murder some nearly 60 years ago.
* https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/17/us/colleyville-texas-synagogue-hostage-situation-monday/index.html