There is more than enough reasoning to come to the conclusion that Oswald was guilty.
You base your conclusion on feeling and not facts based on logic and research.
You don't need physical hard evidence to see that.
How would you like to be imprisoned or hung based on lack of evidence?
Going a bit off subject but Charles Manson was convicted (and rightly so I believe) of the Tate and LaBianca murders without even being at the murder scene or committing the murders himself. But with the amount circumstantial evidence and testimony against him he was convicted.
Not too far off subject it would seem as none other than Vincent Bugliosi [
Reclaiming History] was the prosecuting DA.
The Manson murder trial was the longest murder trial in American history when it occurred, lasting nine and a half months. The trial was among the most publicized American criminal cases of the twentieth century and was dubbed the "trial of the century". The jury had been sequestered for 225 days, longer than any jury before it. The trial transcript alone ran to 209 volumes or 31,716 pages.[88]
Wiki
Manson is dead and undoubtedly will rot in hell. Oswald was denied his right to a defense.
