The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth

[Jon Banks]

And the HSCA cult? And the Washington Post cult? And the PBS cult?

We've had numerous investigations by the government and by the media and by private reporters/historians directly and indirectly into this event. They found nothing (yes, I'm including the HSCA).

You just dismiss all of this. Everybody lied, everybody was corrupted, everybody was fooled.

Right, who really has a faith based view on Oswald's innocence here?

There’s lots of room for speculation and not everyone who believes there was a conspiracy assumes Oswald was framed.

Some people involved with all the investigations that you mentioned suspected or believed there was a conspiracy. It just can’t be proven that there was a conspiracy at this point and may never be proven.

The biggest Tell for me is that both Lyndon Johnson and Robert Kennedy privately suspected that there was a conspiracy while publicly supporting the Warren report (Johnson publicly admitted so suspecting a conspiracy shortly before he died). Why did they feel the need to support the Warren Report? We’ll never know but we can speculate.

I’m afraid the complete declassification of JFK assassination related files will never happen as they will keep using the same excuses for delaying compliance with the Law…

[Martin Weidmann]

Says the zero who doesn't know the difference between ''0" and "O" on the keyboard

Well, you would know more than anybody about zero! After all it takes one to know one.

[Jerry Freeman]

So far I have contributed US$150.00 to the forum. I haven't noticed any contributions from you.

This is a research forum? = None, no, nada, ziltch that is--"0"  gainful knowledge from you here.
 So keep posting your silly cartoons, gifs, and bogus youtube clips if you really think you've earned it
I have contributed thoughtful scrutiny here...judge lest you be judged---pitiful one.

[John Iacoletti]

We've had numerous investigations by the government and by the media and by private reporters/historians directly and indirectly into this event. They found nothing (yes, I'm including the HSCA).

These "investigations" relied on all of the same conjectures, assumptions, and flawed source material as the WC.  Don't pretend that they were somehow independent.  Or actual investigations.

[Bill Chapman]

Well, you would know more than anybody about zero! After all it takes one to know one.

There's nothing 'zero' about the truth regarding the very low bandwidth
hits of my innovative, to-the-point method of communication

So as you pair of rats scurry off your stinking, sinking ship-of-fools,
I will remind others that my push-back re Freeman concerns his
charge that the images involved score Gigabyte levels of bandwidth usage

Watch this, and keep in mind that you can pull the original image off the forum
page onto your desktop and get the image size using your own 'Get info' app.

Here: Pull this off the forum page and yank it to your desktop

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Tracy: Aren't these documents the same ones that were found and reviewed by the AARB ARRB and then withheld on national security concerns? These are the ones that Judge Tunheim said he saw and that, in his opinion, contained sources and methods and nothing indicating a conspiracy?

Or is this a different batch?

To my knowledge, we are indeed talking about the same documents and they were all reviewed by Tunheim. He saw no smoking guns.

I couldn't agree more with the rest of your comments and the way you have expressed them. Morley can't be taken seriously as a journalist anymore-he is a far left conspiracy activist. I wish everyone would read Nalli's article. The case against Oswald is as ironclad in 2021 as it was in 1964. Perhaps even more so.

Thanks for reading my article.

[Bill Chapman]

This is a research forum? = None, no, nada, ziltch that is--"0"  gainful knowledge from you here.
 So keep posting your silly cartoons, gifs, and bogus youtube clips if you really think you've earned it
I have contributed thoughtful scrutiny here...judge lest you be judged---pitiful one.

Your 'thoughtful scrutiny' has only revealed your ridiculous, adolescent 'asks'. The worst, most useless I've seen on this forum. That, amid six decades of nameless 'conspirators', and shooter(s) not named Oswald. What... too soon?

Now, be a man.. answer your charges and tell us how you came with any GB-sized bandwidth hits. What, too soon?

UPDATED 7:38PM  EST