The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth  (Read 47724 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2021, 01:12:17 AM »
There's nothing 'zero' about the truth regarding the very low bandwidth
hits of my innovative, to-the-point method of communication

So as you pair of rats scurry off your stinking, sinking ship-of-fools,
I will remind others that my push-back re Freeman concerns his
charge that the images involved score Gigabyte levels of bandwidth usage

Watch this, and keep in mind that you can pull the original image off the forum
page onto your desktop and get the image size using your own 'Get info' app.

Here: Pull this off the forum page and yank it to your desktop


There's nothing 'zero' about the truth regarding the very low bandwidth

That may be, but there is everything zero about you.

And the next time you call forum members "rats", I will demand that admin enforces the rules of the forum.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2021, 01:27:50 AM »

 ...there is everything zero about you. And the next time you call forum members "rats", I will demand that admin enforces the rules of the forum.
You see Bill Chapman....nobody likes you.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth
« Reply #37 on: November 04, 2021, 01:45:32 AM »
There's nothing 'zero' about the truth regarding the very low bandwidth

That may be, but there is everything zero about you.

And the next time you call forum members "rats", I will demand that admin enforces the rules of the forum.

LOL. All of a sudden you're lilly white. 
 
The guy who insults every LN in every post. The guy who, when new rules were announced concerning paying a fine if rules were broken said 'nobody is going to tell me what to say'

You're a real piece of work, Slick..

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth
« Reply #38 on: November 04, 2021, 02:10:11 AM »
LOL. All of a sudden you're lilly white. 
 
The guy who insults every LN in every post. The guy who, when new rules were announced concerning paying a fine if rules were broken said 'nobody is going to tell me what to say'

You're a real piece of work, Slick..

You're a real piece of work, Slick..

It takes one to know one. But go ahead and try your luck...

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth
« Reply #39 on: November 04, 2021, 02:11:28 AM »
You see Bill Chapman....nobody likes you.

:'(
I'm all shook up


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth
« Reply #40 on: November 04, 2021, 02:13:21 AM »
:'(
I'm all shook up

Of course your not... you're used to people not liking you all your life, so why should you be shook up.

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth
« Reply #41 on: November 04, 2021, 02:14:23 AM »
To my knowledge, we are indeed talking about the same documents and they were all reviewed by Tunheim. He saw no smoking guns.

You guys love to use strawmen.

No JFK assassination researcher to my knowledge has the expectation that there’s a smoking gun in the government’s JFK files.



I couldn't agree more with the rest of your comments and the way you have expressed them. Morley can't be taken seriously as a journalist anymore-he is a far left conspiracy activist. I wish everyone would read Nalli's article. The case against Oswald is as ironclad in 2021 as it was in 1964. Perhaps even more so.

Thanks for reading my article.

Morley is a great journalist and JFK assassination researcher.

We may never find the truth about who killed JFK but I think Morley, John Newman and others are onto something with their research into how much James Angelton and others knew about Oswald prior to 11/22/63.