The JFK Files: Rhetoric vs. Truth

[Steve M. Galbraith]

From the article quoting Mark Zaid:

"there is the possibility there's some information within these files that still needs to be protected … I'll give you one example. Lee Harvey Oswald, the expected assassin, went to Mexico City in September of 1963. We know he visited the Soviet and the Cuban embassies. We might have had, probably did, sources in those embassies, both human and technical, and protecting those sources, especially human, they could still be alive 58 years later. They could be in their 80s right now."

In Jefferson Morley's book on Win Scott he shows pretty convincingly that the US government, through the CIA, had essentially bribed much of the Mexican government to follow US policy.

I'll guess that some of those officials are still alive and were promised anonymity in return for, er, let's say "cooperation".

As to sources in the embassies: the CIA was pretty adamant that Oswald never met Cuban officials or had any dealings with Cuban connected people outside of the incidents in the embassies and consulates. This included the so-called "twist party" that Oswald allegedly went to where he was seen with some Cuban embassy officials including the consul Azcue. The CIA said it never happened. I'll guess that sources - Duran? - who did attend the party said Oswald never was there. Would they still be alive?

[Jon Banks]

In Jefferson Morley's book on Win Scott he shows pretty convincingly that the US government, through the CIA, had essentially bribed much of the Mexican government to follow US policy.

I'll guess that some of those officials are still alive and were promised anonymity in return for cooperation.

As to sources in the embassies: the CIA was pretty adamant that Oswald never met Cuban officials or had any dealings with Cuban connected people outside of the incidents in the embassies and consulates. This included the so-called "twist party" that Oswald allegedly went to where he was seen with some Cuban embassy officials including the consul Azcue. The CIA said it never happened. I'll guess that sources - Duran? - who did attend the party said Oswald never was there. Would they still be alive?

Who in the Mexican government from back in 1963 is still serving in their government today? 

They’ve gone through several changes in government since the 1960s and the current regime doesn’t have a cozy relationship with the US.

Names of sensitive government assets usually can be redacted.

Does it violate the JFK Records Act to release the records with redactions?

[Steve M. Galbraith]

You could say the same thing about the cult that believes the WC got it right.

And the HSCA cult? And the Washington Post cult? And the PBS cult?

We've had numerous investigations by the government and by the media and by private reporters/historians directly and indirectly into this event. They found nothing (yes, I'm including the HSCA).

You just dismiss all of this. Everybody lied, everybody was corrupted, everybody was fooled.

Right, who really has a faith based view on Oswald's innocence here?

[Bill Chapman]

I believe everyone has seen Chapman's position here. Now if he will do the board a favor and go back and delete all of those idiotic images that have been posted and recover untold gigabytes of valuable web space

'untold gigabytes'
_the average image bandwidth hit is as seen below, Giggles

'valuable web space'
_I have yet to see you contribute money to the forum

--------------
INFO for
'THE UNTOLD'
(AKA CTers)
--------------




billchapman



One thousand KB = One MB
One thousand MB = One GB
The posted samples are each a mere 714Kb
Not even ONE Mb

Do the math, GIGgles
And consider yourself TOLD

[Martin Weidmann]

'untold gigabytes'
_the average image bandwidth hit is as seen below, Giggles

'valuable web space'
_I have yet to see you contribute money to the forum

--------------
INFO for
'THE UNTOLD'
(AKA CTers)
--------------

One thousand KB = One MB
One thousand MB = One GB
The posted sample is a mere 714Kb
Not even ONE Mb

Do the math, GIGgles
And consider yourself TOLD

O idiotic pictures = O MB bandwith

[Bill Chapman]

And the HSCA cult? And the Washington Post cult? And the PBS cult?

We've had numerous investigations by the government and by the media and by private reporters/historians directly and indirectly into this event. They found nothing (yes, I'm including the HSCA).

You just dismiss all of this. Everybody lied, everybody was corrupted, everybody was fooled.

Right, who really has a faith based view on Oswald's innocence here?

The 10th & Patton sightings of the 'Gang of 4' doing his/their thing by the 'Gang of 12+' requires no cultish behaviour on anybody's part except the gang of 'AnybodyButOswald'.


   billchapman
   Gang of 4_Oswald/Hidell/OH Lee/Dirty Harvey


    billchapman
    Gang of 12+_Rosetta-stone environs

[Bill Chapman]

O idiotic pictures = O MB bandwith

Says the zero who doesn't know the difference between ''0" and "O" on the keyboard