Don't expect an answer anytime this century, this is the very meat and potatoes of my thread question, the reason they are so obsessed with disproving the bus and cab rides is that they can't move forward because they are stuck in a classic "KookLoop", they lack the deductive reasoning skills to formulate an alternative so they just keep repeating the same nonsense again and again and again, since their very first posts they ignore all the powerful evidence presented as refutation and still haven't moved forward one iota.
This discussion will never get off first base and for some reason these ignorant "researchers" are happy to just stay there and pretend that they are Defence Lawyers so as to continually create chaos and achieve nothing.
JohnM
This case is rife with discrepancy, inconsistency and contradiction. Witnesses can be unreliable, forgetful, plain stupid, fearful of authority and any other number of human fallibilities. The investigation and subsequent enquiry are fraught with unbelievable incompetence and no little corruption leading to an almost impenetrable maze of misdirection.
It is the simplest of tasks to point out this discrepancy and that contradiction and cry "conspiracy" but where all CTers fail is their inability to provide an overarching narrative that makes more sense than that of the LNers.
That is the strength of the LN position - a narrative.
Until CTers can provide an alternative narrative they are just a bunch of children whining about the details and inventing hoaxes they never have to explain.