Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case

[Bill Chapman]

I was referring to Tippit, why not stick to main streets? I assume you did not see my original post questioning Tippit cruising east on 10th.

No problem... police would be (or at least should be) savvy to the fact that fugitives would most likely go off the beaten track; play hide 'n seek. Therefore placing 'sentinels' (if you will) in relatively off-the-grid areas seems a no-brainer to me.


----------
EDIT
BONUS
----------
> 'play hide
'n seek'

[Colin Crow]

No problem... police would be (or at least should be) savvy to the fact that fugitives would most likely go off the beaten track; play hide 'n seek. Therefore placing 'sentinels' (if you will) in relatively off-the-grid areas seems a no-brainer to me.


----------
EDIT
BONUS
----------
> 'play hide
'n seek'

But he was there to prevent crime and be of assistance for armed robbery or clear traffic jams. His predominant purpose in Oak Cliff was not seeking fugitives.

[Martin Weidmann]

You missed the part where Oswald wouldn't tell the cops where he bought the firearm in Fort Worth. So that claim remains, well, worthless..

Who says that Oswald wouldn't tell the cops where he bought the revolver?

And, if he did, what's wrong with a suspect saying "you are the cop, you figure it out"?

You don't conduct an investigation or interrogation without verifying if what the suspect said is true or not.

The FBI spend weeks checking some 400 dry cleaners to find out where Oswald's gray jacket came from
Nobody made any effort to check out the origin of the revolver. Go figure

[Richard Smith]

You are implying that the evidence was planted after the fact with no basis at all to reach that conclusion.

Wrong. The fact that Hill carried a piece of crucial evidence around leaves the door wide open for the possibility of manipulation. Evidence is to be submitted to the Identification Bureau as soon as possible. In this case several pieces of evidence, including the jacket, the revolver and the wallet were not submitted until hours after Oswald's arrest.

So again, here is Martin/Roger arguing that because Hill "carried a piece of crucial evidence around" that it "leaves the door wide open for the possibility of manipulation."  Something he now claims that no one has argued.  Martin/Roger has a very ambiguous relationship with the truth.  My point - once again - is that even if Hill carried the pistol around that is not evidence of "manipulation" of the evidence.  The evidence remains the evidence even if Hill did not follow the proper procedure (again something Martin/Roger has claimed but not demonstrated).

[Richard Smith]

Oh I understood what you were saying alright. It's BS as per usual.

And there is nothing about Hill allegedly maintaining control over the pistol for a couple of hours that leads to the conclusion that it was "manipulated" as you stupidly and without any basis whatsoever suggested.

Are you always this dumb or do you only act that way on this forum? Nobody has claimed that Hill walking around with a revolver would justify the conclusion that it was manipulated. That's just another one of your long list of strawman.


Your making up stuff again, as per usual

Who is making up stuff Roger?

"The fact that Hill carried a piece of crucial evidence around leaves the door wide open for the possibility of manipulation."

[Martin Weidmann]

So again, here is Martin/Roger arguing that because Hill "carried a piece of crucial evidence around" that it "leaves the door wide open for the possibility of manipulation."  Something he now claims that no one has argued.  Martin/Roger has a very ambiguous relationship with the truth.  My point - once again - is that even if Hill carried the pistol around that is not evidence of "manipulation" of the evidence.  The evidence remains the evidence even if Hill did not follow the proper procedure (again something Martin/Roger has claimed but not demonstrated).

Just how much more stupid can you get?

When I say; "because Hill carried a piece of crucial evidence around that it leaves the door wide open for the possibility of manipulation." I am not saying that it is evidence of manipulation.

All it means is that if Hill had handed in the revolver straight away, the possibility of a claim of manipulation would be a lot less.

I am amazed that I even have to explain something so simple and obvious to you.

Who is making up stuff Roger?

"The fact that Hill carried a piece of crucial evidence around leaves the door wide open for the possibility of manipulation."

You are, by linking a statement I made to a guy named Roger! Pathetic!

[Colin Crow]

Was he?

Mr. BELIN. All right. Will you please state then what happened, what you saw, what you did, what you heard?
Mr. SCOGGINS. Well, I first seen the police car cruising east.
Mr. BELIN. About how fast was it cruising?
Mr. SCOGGINS. Not more than 10 or 12 miles a hour, I would say.
Mr. BELIN. It was going east on what street?
Mr. SCOGGINS. On Tenth.