Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case

[Martin Weidmann]

Incredible.  You still don't follow the point.  Again, it is not whether some rube jury might deliver a not guilty verdict in a hypothetical criminal trial based on some procedural point of law (which you haven't demonstrated).  No one cares in 2021 whether Oswald might have got off on some technicality or defense attorney tactic per OJ (who was guilty).  The issue is whether the evidence confirms that Oswald murdered JFK and Tippit.  And there is nothing about Hill allegedly maintaining control over the pistol for a couple of hours that leads to the conclusion that it was "manipulated" as you stupidly and without any basis whatsoever suggested.  Just because it is always "possible" for evidence to be planted is not a sufficient basis to rebut the evidence.  The evidence is still the evidence.  There is absolutely nothing in the record to suggest that the pistol or ammo was planted on Oswald.  In fact, Oswald himself admitted ownership of the pistol.  Even Oswald was not as dishonest as you.

Oh I understood what you were saying alright. It's BS as per usual.

And there is nothing about Hill allegedly maintaining control over the pistol for a couple of hours that leads to the conclusion that it was "manipulated" as you stupidly and without any basis whatsoever suggested.

Are you always this dumb or do you only act that way on this forum? Nobody has claimed that Hill walking around with a revolver would justify the conclusion that it was manipulated. That's just another one of your long list of strawman. What needs to be proven is that the revolver Hill walked around with is the one they took of Oswald. What doesn't help (and what you conveniently forget) is that Hill took that revolver to the DPD lunchroom (if I remember correctly), told some of the guys there that it was Oswald's revolver and had them (some were not even present at the arrest) initial the weapon for a fictitious chain of custody, in much the same way it was done with the jacket. And that does suggest manipulation of evidence whether you like it or not.

Just because it is always "possible" for evidence to be planted is not a sufficient basis to rebut the evidence. 

Says who? Evidence and proof are two very different things. Evidence needs to be authenticated and scrutinized for it's veracity. Evidence isn't automatically valid to the extent that it's invalidity needs to be proven.

There is absolutely nothing in the record to suggest that the pistol or ammo was planted on Oswald. 

Nobody said a word about a revolver being planted on Oswald.

In fact, Oswald himself admitted ownership of the pistol.

No he didn't. If the reports are to believed he merely admitted having a revolver, which he said he had bought in Fort Worth. They never showed him the Smith & Wesson for identifcation.

Your making up stuff again, as per usual

[Colin Crow]

Completely agree with Bill Brown --- Not Colin.

Thank you to Jack and Bill B.

My not knowing the area and given the circumstances I would have thought he might have stayed on say, Beckley or Jefferson.

[Bill Chapman]

OJ had a trial.

Oswald didn't.

Fixed it for you... 

OJ was a somebody
Oswald was a nobody

----------
EDIT
BONUS
----------
> Oswald was seen killing Tippit while looking exactly like himself.
Oswald would fry.

There: Fixed your wagon.

[Colin Crow]

With the exception of the chicken sandwich discussions, I agree.  Colin is a cut above the average CTer.  Even when I disagree with his conclusions, I acknowledge that he has made the effort to provide the supporting evidence.  Something that few others bother to do while playing defense attorney for Oswald.

Thank you Richard.

[Bill Chapman]

Thank you to Jack and Bill B.

My not knowing the area and given the circumstances I would have thought he might have stayed on say, Beckley or Jefferson.

The (presumably) heavier traffic on those routes (well, at least as compared to the, apparently, 'go-nowhere street' claimed here recently)  would potentially lead to more 'eyes on' from motorists listening to a description of events. Not to mention potentially more pedestrians as well. Especially those who want to go somewhere 

And as far as Oswald knew, the cops might already have his address, and in that case one would be more than a little foolhardy to remain on streets that would lead them directly to the Lee safe-house. In fact, weren't the cop cars that the alert citizen Brewer noticed (while seeing the nobody duck out of sight to look at tennis shoes) heading up Jefferson at some point?

[Bill Chapman]

No he didn't. If the reports are to believed he merely admitted having a revolver, which he said he had bought in Fort  With

You missed the part where Oswald wouldn't tell the cops where he bought the firearm in Fort Worth. So that claim remains, well, worthless..

[Colin Crow]

The (presumably) heavier traffic on those routes (well, at least as compared to the, apparently, 'go-nowhere street' claimed here recently)  would potentially lead to more 'eyes on' from motorists listening to a description of events. Not to mention potentially more pedestrians as well. Especially those who want to go somewhere 

I was referring to Tippit, why not stick to main streets? I assume you did not see my original post questioning Tippit cruising east on 10th.