Was Hickey's AR15 in burst mode?

[Royell Storing]

Is this supposed to be a credible explanation?
Both men were incredibly close friends of JFK. Why would they choose to "go deaf, dumb, and blind"?
Why did none of the witnesses on either side of the limo see or hear the AR-15 firing?
Why did no-one see it?
Why did no-one hear it?

 Again, it depends on when the AR-15 was fired. I continue stressing that the discharge missed JFK. Gordon Arnold detailed "report" going over his head AFTER he dove to the ground. Connect the dots

[Mitch Todd]

The muzzle of the AR15 was ahead of Powers & O'Donnell. Just behind & to the right of the right ear of driver Kinney.

Neither of which actually address what I pointed out.

[Jack Nessan]

    Like I said before, the SS is a brotherhood. They stick together. This includes their hitting the hard stuff the night before at "beat nick joint" in Ft Worth.
    An idling car and/or a backfiring motorcycle smells Nothing like gun powder.
    If you are referring to the Chaney interview that has been on You Tube for a long while, yes I have seen it.

So, you have seen Chaney’s video with Jim Lord and you do not think the man closest to JFK and a WWII combat veteran stating that there were only two shots is important? Instead, you decide to push this tripe about Hickey, which is completely unsupported by all the people who were around the rifle itself? Actually, it makes sense in the context of what you are always posting here.

[Jack Nessan]

Its strange that Hill did not hear (or see) the headshot.
Muchmore shows that Hill is looking straight at jfk or at least at the back of the jfklimo at Z313, ie when level with the left front wheel of Queen Mary.
And, it was Kellerman that told us that Oswald's shot-1 hit jfk at say pseudo Z105, koz Kellerman heard jfk say my god i am hit (bits of lead from the ricochet off the overhead  signals hit jfk in the top right of his head)(seen in xray in galea).
Also, strange that Kellerman admitted that there had been a flurry of shots -- but a day or 2 after the shooting Kellerman & Co were not sure what info would surface, so, they hedged their testimonys, just in case Hickey's firing surfaced, they did not want to obviously look like complete liars.

I am sure Hill was looking at the back of the car. Hill was focused on getting on the car and not slipping off and being run over by the SS car. Hill did hear the headshot. It was the second shot he referred to.

A shot hitting the signal light pole is fantasy. Purely made up crap in an attempt to length the shooting time span. All the eyewitnesses in Dealey Plaza state JFK reacted to having been hit by the first shot. Kellerman referring to the second shot being the headshot only can be interpreted as the first shot was the shot wounding JFK and Connally.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

I am sure Hill was looking at the back of the car. Hill was focused on getting on the car and not slipping off and being run over by the SS car. Hill did hear the headshot. It was the second shot he referred to.

A shot hitting the signal light pole is fantasy. Purely made up crap in an attempt to length the shooting time span. All the eyewitnesses in Dealey Plaza state JFK reacted to having been hit by the first shot. Kellerman referring to the second shot being the headshot only can be interpreted as the first shot was the shot wounding JFK and Connally.

Below is a link to my thread re Oswald's shot-1 being a ricochet offa the signals.
My estimate of pseudo Z123 or Z113 etc varies over time, but in the end i think i tended to go with Holland's Z103 (or Z105 praps).
But all of thems estimates are identical re pozzy, the pozzy was just past the signals.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2862.0.html
Many witnesses said that the first shot was just as the jfklimo straightened in Elm St or words to that effect.
I found a new witness (Whatley) that said so too.

[Jack Nessan]

Below is a link to my thread re Oswald's shot-1 being a ricochet offa the signals.
My estimate of pseudo Z123 or Z113 etc varies over time, but in the end i think i tended to go with Holland's Z103 (or Z105 praps).
But all of thems estimates are identical re pozzy, the pozzy was just past the signals.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2862.0.html
Many witnesses said that the first shot was just as the jfklimo straightened in Elm St or words to that effect.
I found a new witness (Whatley) that said so too.

The first shot occurred around Z218 or a few frames earlier. The witnesses tell you JFK’s location by referencing their own location.

The light pole thing is just laughable. Holland went off the rails with that theory. Holland and ABC made fools of themselves with the TV special based on that brilliant line of thinking. A simple study of the eyewitnesses would be all that is needed to abandon the theory. Apparently, they decided to dismiss the statements of the people who actually knew what did happen.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

The first shot occurred around Z218 or a few frames earlier. The witnesses tell you JFK’s location by referencing their own location.

The light pole thing is just laughable. Holland went off the rails with that theory. Holland and ABC made fools of themselves with the TV special based on that brilliant line of thinking. A simple study of the eyewitnesses would be all that is needed to abandon the theory. Apparently, they decided to dismiss the statements of the people who actually knew what did happen.

Holland did well to realize that shot-1 hit the signals. 
But was nuts to think that that ricochet wounded Tague.
Others are nuts to think that shot-1 or any other shot ricocheted off the tarmac & that fragments ended up in the jfklimo.
Lots of witnesses reckoned that shot-1 was just as the jfklimo straightened up.