One poster created 52 percent of our 208 threads. A concern? Do we have to beg?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: One poster created 52 percent of our 208 threads. A concern? Do we have to beg?  (Read 59803 times)

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1214
📬

?Whether you agree with him or not, researchers such as Rob Caprio for example, took the sensible initiative and saved his own research, and he is now reposting them back on the Forum.

All other members are free to do the same.? ?Duncan MacRae
You did not post a link back to your quote because there is no available post including that quote. Just use the forum search with the word,
example to confirm that you cannot come up with a link to that quote.

If it was posted at one time, maybe it was deleted because of buyers remorse. Even if it was an ethical, honest poster who authored 42 percent
of the 203 threads in this section of this forum, it would still be too many, too soon. But, that is not even the case, here....
Is it?

It appears that Caprio no longer wishes to hang his hat on the Zangretti story.  Nice work Tom.

Our asset to the forum posted this "gem" a few hours ago on another thread.

Quote from: Rob Caprio on February 23, 2018
Incorrect. I have never seen you cite the evidence. You can't because you either don't know it or you realize that it doesn't support your claims. There is no reason not to cite evidence IF you have it. This is simply a cop out because you don't want to admit that you have none.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2018, 12:07:08 AM by Tom Scully »

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1214
Then ask Duncan. It was in the thread started by Mary Jo Wong in which she was asking why the forum was not backed up. You are more than welcomed to repost your stuff, but why bother?

Why don't you show me one post that actually supports anything regarding the JFK assassination. Go ahead. I don't recall one post of yours that taught me anything about the case or the evidence.

You are like Paul May in your obsession with me. It is all about nonsense too. Nothing groundbreaking. Why don't you focus more time on learning the evidence?

Your opinion is worthless to me in case you have not noticed. I wouldn't have to do all this work if the board wasn't hacked, and the chances of that being done by a LNer are much higher. So blame them.

You owe it to yourself to research your claims before posting them.....unless you are incapable of doing it.
According to records of this forum.....or should we rely on your linkless claims, Mary Jo has authored no threads and has posted only
in one thread. Do not be so confident anyone is all that thrilled with you authoring nearly half of all of the threads in this, the most
popular section of this forum. Have some consideration, it is not all about you....slow down....do we have to beg you?

I'm not saying your "permission" to overwhelm this section of the forum with rehashes of your old threads was never posted. I am
pointing out that it is not currently available and there is objection to your indifference about the freakishly disproportional imprint you
are currently afflicting this forum with, aggravated by your record of refusing to admit you are wrong and attacking those who proved you were
wrong.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=91
« Last Edit: February 27, 2018, 04:48:28 AM by Tom Scully »

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Then ask Duncan. It was in the thread started by Mary Jo Wong in which she was asking why the forum was not backed up. You are more than welcomed to repost your stuff, but why bother?

Why don't you show me one post that actually supports anything regarding the JFK assassination. Go ahead. I don't recall one post of yours that taught me anything about the case or the evidence.

You are like Paul May in your obsession with me. It is all about nonsense too. Nothing groundbreaking. Why don't you focus more time on learning the evidence?

Your opinion is worthless to me in case you have not noticed. I wouldn't have to do all this work if the board wasn't hacked, and the chances of that being done by a LNer are much higher. So blame them.

I actually read that post by Duncan you're quoting Rob. There's no denying it's true. But to accuse the LNs of hacking the forum is an utter disgrace. You should withdraw and apologise for that disgusting and groundless allegation.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8171
I actually read that post by Duncan you're quoting Rob. There's no denying it's true. But to accuse the LNs of hacking the forum is an utter disgrace. You should withdraw and apologise for that disgusting and groundless allegation.

You should withdraw and apologise for that disgusting and groundless allegation.

Dennis,

I take it you agree then, that John Mytton also should apologize to Colin Crow for making a similar claim



Yeah, it's people like you who hack Forums because they can't stand any evidence that contradicts their limited shaky viewpoint.

Colin if you can't handle the heat get out of the kitchen.

JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
You should withdraw and apologise for that disgusting and groundless allegation.

Dennis,

I take it you agree then, that John Mytton also should apologize to Colin Crow for making a similar claim



If they were perhaps equivalent you may have a point but both posts are a world apart.

Btw thanks for showing us exactly how obsessed you are with me, I should be honored but actually I'm a little creeped out.



JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8171

If they were perhaps equivalent you may have a point but both posts are a world apart.

Btw thanks for showing us exactly how obsessed you are with me, I should be honored but actually I'm a little creeped out.

JohnM

If they were perhaps equivalent you may have a point but both posts are a world apart.

BS.. but I expected the reply. You (and the content of the reply) are so predictable.

What really is worlds apart though is the planet where you live and earth.

« Last Edit: February 28, 2018, 12:42:43 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
They are "worlds apart" as it is ridiculous to think that Colin would hack this forum and not back up his work, but not to think people who support the official falsehood would want to get rid of a lot of research showing that it is a falsehood.



For a start my post has been taken entirely out of context but you Kooks are famous for your cherry picking so I guess it's just par for the course.
And secondly I said people like Colin, not actually Colin himself whereas your comment was a total affront to our society and the core values which separates us from the animals and was a deliberate and misleading punch to the face for all of us that fight for democracy and freedom!



JohnM