One poster created 52 percent of our 208 threads. A concern? Do we have to beg?

[John Anderson]

Booth was a patsy and his mum was an imposter.

[Tom Scully]

Steve M. Galbraith you need to follow the thread. You seem to think I believe Brennan didn't see anything.

....vs. Brennan, September, 1964:

[John Anderson]

What's yout point?

[John Iacoletti]

Dallas Morning News reporter Hugh Aynesworth was watching the motorcade on Houston Street as he heard shots fired. He immediately ran to the TSBD building - he said he was there within a minute of the shooting - and started to interview the people there. Here is his account of seeing Brennan:

It doesn't really matter how Aynesworth interpreted it, Brennan himself said that he didn't see a rifle discharge.  And Brennan didn't identify anyone in the lineup he attended either.  Everything else is just revisionist excuses.

[John Iacoletti]

Using John I's nutty standard, no one saw John Wilkes Booth shoot Lincoln.  They just heard a shot and turned at that instant to see Booth pointing a smoking gun at Lincoln's head.

This false equivalence again.  Nobody just heard a shot and turned at that instant to see Oswald pointing a smoking gun at anyone's head.

[Tom Scully]

Unfortunately, 86 threads (of 202 total) have been created by one poster with a penchant for never correcting an
inaccuracy or conceding, even in the face of overwhelming posted evidence, that he is mistaken.

......

Slow down,,,,,keep your thread creation proportional....do we have to beg you?

The total percentage of his threads vs the entirety of existing threads of this forum is 42 percent.
(177 threads in this forum section, 13 threads in photograph forum, and 12 threads in video forum)
.....Is there some higher percentage that this thread author would have to
reach before readers would regard this forum as his forum....or that he is actually vandalizing this forum as a consequence
of his disproportional thread creation?

Slow it down....do we have to beg you? is not one poster's 86 threads of 177 total threads in this section of the forum a
spam attack on this forum? Two more threads puts his total in this forum section above 50 percent of all threads here.

[Tim Nickerson]

Slow down,,,,,keep your thread creation proportional....do we have to beg you?

The total percentage of his threads vs the entirety of existing threads of this forum is 42 percent.
(177 threads in this forum section, 13 threads in photograph forum, and 12 threads in video forum)
.....Is there some higher percentage that this thread author would have to
reach before readers would regard this forum as his forum....or that he is actually vandalizing this forum as a consequence
of his disproportional thread creation?

Slow it down....do we have to beg you? is not one poster's 86 threads of 177 total threads in this section of the forum a
spam attack on this forum? Two more threads puts his total in this forum section above 50 percent of all threads here.

Tom, if Duncan doesn't mind him posting his screeds here why do you? They quickly drop down the tier, unresponded to, and disappear from view. Nobody here pays attention to him. LNs or CTs.