Unseeing the Headshot

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Unseeing the Headshot  (Read 42032 times)

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Unseeing the Headshot
« Reply #77 on: January 13, 2021, 04:25:33 AM »
Thanks for sharing that Robin Unger! That is very plausible and a reasonable theory.  Is that why the head goes missing on Z337?   The entire scalp and face was removed and it flew back with momentum and all pieces fell into the compartment when the car braked and he fell back forward ?   In any of slides I have looked at,  I have only seen tissue falling in Z335 (or maybe throwing up?).    I know you have studied the films a lot.   Does anyone have a good quality picture of Z337?  Examining that image in the head area at front is critical to see if there was air brushing or just pixellation.  That is a region showing up on Lightbox frame 337 that should be scrutinized carefully.   If the whole entire front wasn't hanging from scalp down, it can not explain itself.  It appears damage gets worse and worse from Z313 on as if the head was disappearing in a slow phosphorus burn -especially region z330 on.

It is too bad the xrays had to be held in top secret so as not to confirm fractures you have shown (for 50+ years).  They likely don't even exist or substituted in.   We were given renditions by sketch artists instead!   So hard to prove anything without concrete evidence to look at.     Obviously it doesn't match what Orville Nix said!   The evidence gathered says that the shots came from the TSBD because there is proof that it did come from there!  It doesn't matter what you think or thought you saw!!!   Election fraud or not - there is no evidence to suggest otherwise!

« Last Edit: January 13, 2021, 05:23:14 AM by Allan Fritzke »

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Unseeing the Headshot
« Reply #78 on: January 13, 2021, 05:22:26 AM »
You're not answering the question Allan.
JFK's "back and to the left" movement clearly suggests to anyone who sees the Z-film that there is a shot from the front.
Why alter the Z-film if you can't alter that?
What's the point?

Sorry.  Maybe, I should clarify.  If there was even more proof of a frontal shot, you need to hide that evidence if there was even another shot.  (2 shots in quick succession stated by many witnesses).  If what you are saying is true, then why not investigate to prove - no contrary testimony presented at WC - case closed.  We had ample witnesses that said the shots came from the grassy knoll - why was there voices unheard?   Is any of that in the WC report?   The investigators went to great lengths to prove that it was a LNer and that alone.     "Expert" scientists said that the head moved slightly forward in Z313 and they ran with that as the ultimate explanation.    We could say the President was actually shot by autopsy.  No physical evidence presented such as x-rays.  They didn't use them in WC report.  We really don't need to see Z313 at all.  Why even present any photos?  They could have used all kinds of physical evidence at the scene (car, windshield etc.)  The only physical evidence was a gun, casings, pristine bullet on a stretcher and a dead LHO at the hands of a nightclub owner.

Besides, You also have to make sure there is congruency between all pictures and films.   You will note that there is not one film taken from or a clear view of the front of the car, all evidence presented was from one side only, far away.  No photographers captured the front scene of the car or even another perspective from the grassy knoll for that matter - only Zapruder.  If I brought a camera to the scene, I think I would have liked to be elevated on grassy knoll, facing the President's side and with elevation.  There was lots of room over there too!   Note the polaroid picture was snapped  just beyond Z315 and not seen in Zapruder images.  If I was taking a casual picture, I would have taken the picture a little closer to me like at Z300 where President and first lady would be facing me.  It would have been photogenic and something to remember.   Not one picture from that side!  The polaroid was a freak picture and highly unusual as to when it was snapped IMO.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2021, 05:28:02 AM by Allan Fritzke »

Online Robin Unger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: Unseeing the Headshot
« Reply #79 on: January 13, 2021, 05:40:38 AM »
Zapruder frame Crops.


Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Unseeing the Headshot
« Reply #80 on: January 13, 2021, 06:04:25 AM »
Zapruder frame Crops.



Really nicely done - amazing!  I can see on Z337 the blued area where I could fit a Z327 head into.  Look real close or blow up a bit and you can see a "round" hue change at the front.   It fits so perfectly. I also have a perfect fit on the other side of Z337 cut image  with Z312.  I  am not sure if you looked at my earlier posts.  I examined very closely with poor quality images and you can see blending on the Z337 face where they removed part of the top of a nearly like Z312 image!   Use my post below to examine closely!

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2755.msg104452.html#msg104452
« Last Edit: January 13, 2021, 08:55:49 AM by Allan Fritzke »

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: Unseeing the Headshot
« Reply #81 on: January 13, 2021, 07:03:04 AM »
This is how i see the damage to the skull .



Hi Rob,

Fantastic work with the Gifs.
Your graphic for damage to the skull gels with this John Mytton Gif:



I don't know if you've read the OP but I'm starting to get the impression the top of JFK's skull was blown upwards and outwards.
The massive flap of scalp was forced down by the side, and slightly to the front, of his head. The way the flap of scalp seems to hang forward indicates (to me, at least) that the shot came from behind - contrary to my previous stance on this issue.
Pat Speer has written a compelling piece on the subject at his website.

As someone who seems to have dealt extensively with the film materials relating to the assassination, I wonder what your opinion of "alteration" is?

Online Robin Unger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: Unseeing the Headshot
« Reply #82 on: January 13, 2021, 01:14:09 PM »
to answer your question, anyone who has followed me on this forum and others over the last 15 - years knows that i do NOT believe in Alterationist theories.

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: Unseeing the Headshot
« Reply #83 on: January 13, 2021, 04:59:17 PM »
to answer your question, anyone who has followed me on this forum and others over the last 15 - years knows that i do NOT believe in Alterationist theories.

Did you study your cropped Z335 photo and look at the area in front of his head?  Stare at a bit at your cropped image and you can see the outline /shade change in the region - different shade of blue. It can't be missed as I can see it even on my HD screen of what you posted and it is the same thing I see in zooming in on a Lightbox frame - think your copy makes it easier to distinguish.

Note: I just edited this as I realized your image was Z335 and has same spot in front of JFK's head showing a "blue hue".  Z337 actually shows more if you exam it closely.....
« Last Edit: January 14, 2021, 06:04:27 PM by Allan Fritzke »