Unseeing the Headshot

[Allan Fritzke]

And how many times have you heard conspiracy theorists say the "back and to the left" movement of JFK's head and body is clear evidence of a shot from the front.
As soon as the Z-film became public the "back and to the left" motion was jumped on by many as proof of conspiracy. If there was a shot from the front then there was more than one shooter. If there was more than one shooter there was a conspiracy.
I'm sure that anyone who sees the Z-film for the first time must be struck by JFK's movement after the headshot - "back and to the left".
This motion is. by far, the thing that indicates conspiracy so I ask you -

What is the point of altering anything in the Z-film if you leave in the most significant indicator of conspiracy?

Why not just destroy a film that contains such a clear indication of conspiracy?

Answer that.  What is the most significant indicator of conspiracy in your eyes? 

For me, if you really had a LNer, there is no point having him or letting him be killed.  (Nightclub owner Jack Ruby was a real patriot.)  LHO was guilty as charged unless he had a story to tell which we never got to hear.    He couldn't defend myself and so one less loose end.   Holding the film in secrecy for years benefits nobody except the perpetrators.    If you can prove film modification (in the case of Zapruder's),  it was done as a coup - evidence wasn't there to convict LHO as a LNer otherwise!   This modification was a very serious undertaking and took Hollywood experts.   JFK didn't belong in the Whitehouse and neither does/did Trump.   Not easy to prove 57 years later as evidence has been shredded.  They should have made this film just disappear after 10 years - very ironic that JFK's blood can still cry out for justice.

[Dan O'meara]

Answer that.  What is the most significant indicator of conspiracy in your eyes? 

For me, if you really had a LNer, there is no point having him or letting him be killed.  (Nightclub owner Jack Ruby was a real patriot.)  LHO was guilty as charged unless he had a story to tell which we never got to hear.    He couldn't defend myself and so one less loose end.   Holding the film in secrecy for years benefits nobody except the perpetrators.    If you can prove film modification (in the case of Zapruder's),  it was done as a coup - evidence wasn't there to convict LHO as a LNer otherwise!   This modification was a very serious undertaking and took Hollywood experts.   JFK didn't belong in the Whitehouse and neither does/did Trump.   Not easy to prove 57 years later as evidence has been shredded.  They should have made this film just disappear after 10 years - very ironic that JFK's blood can still cry out for justice.

hmmm...

Answer that.  What is the most significant indicator of conspiracy in your eyes?

I've already answered that Allan.
That was the point of my post.

IN THE Z-FILM, THE MOST SIGNIFICANT INDICATOR OF CONSPIRACY IS JFK'S "BACK AND TO THE LEFT" MOTION.

My question is this - if you can't alter the most significant indicator of conspiracy in the Z-film (the "back and to the left" motion of JFK after the headshot), then what is the point of altering anything else in the Z-film?

[Allan Fritzke]

hmmm...

I've already answered that Allan.
That was the point of my post.

IN THE Z-FILM, THE MOST SIGNIFICANT INDICATOR OF CONSPIRACY IS JFK'S "BACK AND TO THE LEFT" MOTION.

My question is this - if you can't alter the most significant indicator of conspiracy in the Z-film (the "back and to the left" motion of JFK after the headshot), then what is the point of altering anything else in the Z-film?

I didn't know you believed in a frontal shot anymore?!  They all came from LHO right - rear and behind not?   If that is not the case and it came from elsewhere, someone framed him and he was a patsy.  I didn't say he wasn't involved.  I believe he operated covertly and was used by his handlers.  He didn't understand the outcome!   Failure of an LNer means it was most definitely an overthrow in government and inside job.  Why else would you go to great lengths to have him killed and tidy loose ends?    The modifications I have seen are so obvious to me.  If I had digitized photos bigger than 200 KB, there would laughable evidence to present.    When you put Z313 into the mix, you are most definitely putting the explosion to the front.  Contrary to the "cloud" theory, Mrs. Kennedy was not blinded instantly!   If the rest of the sequence was showing more contrary evidence to this,  you would need to hide it.    Skulduggery at the highest level!

Again,  we are told some files were locked up (as a matter of national security) for more than 50 years.  What are people trying to hide or pretend to hide and why did they not  just convicted LHO in the first place by court of law?   I see very definite matches in those pictures I have posted.    I have spent countless hours looking at Zapruder film and know what I see.  You have to be blind not to see what I have shown with poor resolution photos.    There is perfect match in Z312 to Z337 on LHS with "scrubbing" present even on Jacqueline's face where it was blended in.

[Dan O'meara]

I didn't know you believed in a frontal shot anymore?!  They all came from LHO right - rear and behind not?   If that is not the case and it came from elsewhere, someone framed him and he was a patsy.  I didn't say he wasn't involved.  I believe he operated covertly and was used by his handlers.  He didn't understand the outcome!   Failure of an LNer means it was most definitely an overthrow in government and inside job.  Why else would you go to great lengths to have him killed and tidy loose ends?    The modifications I have seen are so obvious to me.  If I had digitized photos bigger than 200 KB, there would laughable evidence to present.    When you put Z313 into the mix, you are most definitely putting the explosion to the front.  Contrary to the "cloud" theory, Mrs. Kennedy was not blinded instantly!   If the rest of the sequence was showing more contrary evidence to this,  you would need to hide it.    Skulduggery at the highest level!

Again,  we are told some files were locked up (as a matter of national security) for more than 50 years.  What are people trying to hide or pretend to hide and why did they not  just convicted LHO in the first place by court of law?   I see very definite matches in those pictures I have posted.    I have spent countless hours looking at Zapruder film and know what I see.  You have to be blind not to see what I have shown with poor resolution photos.    There is perfect match in Z312 to Z337 on LHS with "scrubbing" present even on Jacqueline's face where it was blended in.

You're not answering the question Allan.
JFK's "back and to the left" movement clearly suggests to anyone who sees the Z-film that there is a shot from the front.
Why alter the Z-film if you can't alter that?
What's the point?

[Robin Unger]

This is how i see the damage to the skull .

[Robin Unger]

Nix headshot Zoomed

[Robin Unger]

Stabilized Zapruder GIF