On The Trail Of Delusion

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 160056 times)

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: On The Trail Of Delusion
« Reply #896 on: February 06, 2022, 03:24:21 PM »
From Jim DiEugenio on Twitter:

If you want to see the Kirchick/Weiner/Max HollandCIA story about the KGB influencing Jim Garrison demolished, just click here:

https://www.c-span.org/video/?183565-4/warren-report-garrison-investigation



Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
Jim Garrison Hoped Clay Shaw Would Commit Suicide
« Reply #897 on: February 07, 2022, 02:37:26 PM »
Jim Garrison Hoped Clay Shaw Would Commit Suicide
Shaw would not oblige.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jim-garrison-hoped-clay-shaw-would-commit-suicide

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
Re: On The Trail Of Delusion
« Reply #898 on: February 08, 2022, 02:22:31 PM »
Penn Jones' Phone Call with Sylvia Meagher
In July 1967, Penn Jones and Sylvia Meagher had a stormy phone call largely about Jim Garrison.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/penn-jones-phone-call-with-sylvia-meagher

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: On The Trail Of Delusion
« Reply #899 on: February 09, 2022, 05:09:00 AM »
Tim Weiner: “The CIA wasn’t involved with drug trafficking”

James Kirchick: “Bush didn’t lie about Iraq”

Gerald Posner: lied in his book “Case Closed” and has been caught multiple times for plagiarism

 :D


Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
Re: On The Trail Of Delusion
« Reply #900 on: February 09, 2022, 02:30:53 PM »
Hugh Aynesworth on the Garrison Investigation
Part one of a five party series of the farce in New Orleans. This series appeared in the Pittsburgh Press in February 1969.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/hugh-aynesworth-on-the-garrison-investigation

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1878
Re: On The Trail Of Delusion
« Reply #901 on: February 09, 2022, 07:42:55 PM »
Hugh Aynesworth on the Garrison Investigation
Part one of a five party series of the farce in New Orleans. This series appeared in the Pittsburgh Press in February 1969.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/hugh-aynesworth-on-the-garrison-investigation
Garrison's general view on the assassination - that the national security state of the US that emerged after WWII due to the actions by Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union killed JFK because he threatened their power and status - still holds sway among a group of people including Oliver Stone. Who, in case it's not known, made a famous, widely shown movie promoting Garrison's claims about the murder of JFK.

If none of this happened, if Stone et al. weren't still to this day promoting Garrison's nonsense, you likely wouldn't be writing about it. And we wouldn't be talking about it much if at all.

The problem is not with you; the problem is some people still believe and promote these falsehoods. And I find it both interesting and revealing that the people who are angry with you aren't angry with Garrison and Stone. They are the ones discrediting the conspiracy view not you.

If you're a conspiracy believer or think the lone assassin explanation is wrong (the two aren't the same) you should be furious with what Stone and DiEugenio are doing. They make your side look quite foolish.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2022, 08:49:32 PM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Online W. Tracy Parnell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
    • W. Tracy Parnell Debunking JFK Conspiracy Theories
Re: On The Trail Of Delusion
« Reply #902 on: February 09, 2022, 08:19:36 PM »
Garrison's general view on the assassination - that the national security state of the US that emerged after WWII due to the actions by Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union - killed JFK because he threatened their power and status - still holds sway among a group of people including Oliver Stone. Who, in case it's not known, made a famous, widely shown movie promoting Garrison's claims about the murder of JFK.

If none of this happened, if Stone et al. weren't still to this day promoting Garrison's nonsense, you likely wouldn't be writing about it. And we wouldn't be talking about it much if at all.

The problem is not with you; the problem is some people still believe and promote these falsehoods. And I find it both interesting and revealing that the people who are angry with you aren't angry with Garrison and Stone. They are the ones discrediting the conspiracy view not you.

If you're a conspiracy believer or think the lone assassin explanation is wrong (the two aren't the same) you should be furious with what Stone and DiEugenio are doing. The make your side look quite foolish.

Perfectly stated.