On The Trail Of Delusion

[Jerry Freeman]

But if they didn't use the Imperial Reflex....

They did...that is why the film marks match the negatives that were found. The Imperial Reflex was used to copy the high quality prints created in a lab. That is why the released photos are so crappy.
Jack White demonstrated this in his video lecture [which the nutheads choose to ignore]
 The cops searched the Paine garage several times but didn't locate that Imperial.

Weeks later...Robert Oswald produced the camera.
Oswald's brother said that he found the camera at the Paine home even though the Dallas police had searched the home several times for the camera. Robert said that the camera belonged to his brother Lee Oswald. This reflex camera was a very poor quality camera and Oswald was highly interested in photography. He owned several very expensive cameras and no one ever explained why he would use such a cheap camera for these photographs.

https://www.pimall.com/nais/news/backyard.html
How did that camera manage to sneak back to the Paine house?

[Jerry Freeman]

How did that camera manage to sneak back to the Paine house?

Of course there is a perfectly logical explanation ...the nutters just haven't invented one yet.

[W. Tracy Parnell]

David Von Pein

ROFL

Let me say this. When David Von Pein was still on the Education Forum he was thanked by CTs for the resources at his site. Say what you want, his site is an amazing resource.

[Jerry Freeman]

David Von Pein

ROFL

I can't quite fully understand why most conspiracy theorists just don't
look upon the Backyard Photos as being genuine (which, of course, they
are), and then utilize the "CT" philosophy that these "real" photos
have aided the "Patsy" plan after the fact (i.e., after the shots were
fired by their "look-alike Oswald" on the 6th Floor of the Book
Depository on November 22, 1963).

David Von Pein
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/backyard-photos.html
Try and understand...maybe someday 

Let me say this. When David Von Pein was still on the Education Forum he was thanked by CTs for the resources at his site.
 Say what you want, his site is an amazing resource.

Full of tacky criticism and verbose insults...I understand that is why he was removed from the ED.

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Full of tacky criticism and verbose insults...I understand that is why he was removed from the ED.

Jerry,

Your "understanding" is not correct. He was removed because the "powers that be" decided that his archiving of debates on his website that he had at EF with DiEugenio and others violated forum policy even though he had been doing it for some time before anyone complained.

[Bill Brown]

Yes it would. And the same goes for you.

You would be making a complete fool of yourself with BS like your claim of Callaway putting Tippit in the ambulance before making his radio call.

Too bad you will always find a way to weasel out of a face to face meeting. Your recent videos show that you love to hear yourself talk and your need to be in control of the discussion which is most likely why you want to hide behind a zoom meeting with the possibility of "technical difficulties" whenever something comes up you don't like.

Yes it would. And the same goes for you.

The difference is I'm serious about debating you while you're doing nothing more than putting up a false front with unreasonable travel demands, etc...

You would be making a complete fool of yourself with BS like your claim of Callaway putting Tippit in the ambulance before making his radio call.

Nah.

You just don't know how to read and correctly decipher the testimonial record combined with the police tapes; an obvious characteristic (and fault) of yours.

Too bad you will always find a way to weasel out of a face to face meeting. Your recent videos show that you love to hear yourself talk and your need to be in control of the discussion which is most likely why you want to hide behind a zoom meeting with the possibility of "technical difficulties" whenever something comes up you don't like.

More false fronts.

I have never "weaseled out of a face to face meeting with you".  I've said close to a half dozen times now to let me know the next time you're in the States.  You know how impractical this "face to face" scenario is and therefore you count on it to make it seem like you're game, which you clearly are not.  If you were game, you'd agree to doing some sort of a debate on a podcast THIS WEEK (but everyone here knows you will not do this).

The sad part is that (for some unknown reason) you believe you're smarter than everyone else and you believe that no one else can see the false bravado you're putting up (with the "just tell me when and where" bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns).  The reality is that everyone reading this can see through you.

The only person falling back on "technical difficulties" is you.

This is real simple.  Debate me THIS WEEK.  A host can be easily found.  You won't, though.

[Bill Brown]

Fred, apologies for the hi-jacking of your thread.

[Jerry Freeman]

From the Litwin article..

Gochenaur was not a direct witness to anything....

So?
Neither was Jesse Curry, Henry Wade, Ruth Paine, George or Jeanne De Mohrenschildt, Eva Grant, Robert or Marguerite Oswald or even Marina Oswald who... without her forced testimony against Lee----the Warren Commissioners would have had quite the feeble case.
  Among direct witnesses who should have been called--Hugh Aynesworth and William Alexander.