On The Trail Of Delusion

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 155303 times)

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #658 on: December 05, 2021, 12:29:24 PM »
See the comparisons below:







The backyard photos aren’t great quality so one can’t be 100% certain but it doesn’t look identical to the Book Depository rifle in my opinion. You can clearly see the front strap is on the bottom in the BYP, not on the side of the barrel…

I like the way you start off saying the "backyard photos aren’t great quality so one can’t be 100% certain", before then pronouncing you "can clearly see".
Just to clarify - you can't clearly see where the strap is connected to the rifle. The quality of the photo is too poor to discern that. In my view, the way to determine where the strap is connected to the barrel of the rifle is to follow how the strap is hanging from the rifle. Gravity will pull the strap down from the point it is connected to the rifle (IMO).
In the pic below I have highlighted (with a red arrow) where the strap appears to be connected to the rifle.



"As we can clearly see", the strap is connected to the bottom of the barrel of the rifle and not the side. I believe there is a bit of excess strap material that bends off to the right after the connection and it is this you are using for your determination as to where the strap is connected to the rifle.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #659 on: December 05, 2021, 01:21:07 PM »
Yep.  If he was actually serious about it, wouldn't that be something?

Yes it would. And the same goes for you.

You would be making a complete fool of yourself with BS like your claim of Callaway putting Tippit in the ambulance before making his radio call.

Too bad you will always find a way to weasel out of a face to face meeting. Your recent videos show that you love to hear yourself talk and your need to be in control of the discussion which is most likely why you want to hide behind a zoom meeting with the possibility of "technical difficulties" whenever something comes up you don't like.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2021, 03:54:37 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #660 on: December 05, 2021, 03:58:14 PM »
You ran scared on that one.  And the delusional nonsense about sending a "private plane" was hilarious.  Comedy gold.  Hiding in your mom's basement while claiming to be in Europe etc.    BS:

More likely Rog would be ducking , dodging or deflecting into mom's basement

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
Was James Gochenaur a Credible Witness in "JFK Revisited"?
« Reply #661 on: December 05, 2021, 04:23:53 PM »
Was James Gochenaur a Credible Witness in "JFK Revisited"?
Oliver Stones so-called documentary, JFK Revisited, uses James Gochenaur, a former student at the University of Washington at Seattle, to buttress two of its claims. But is he a credible witness? You'll be surprised at some of his writings in the early 1970s.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/was-james-gochenaur-a-credible-witness-in-jfk-revisited

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #662 on: December 05, 2021, 04:40:55 PM »
More likely Rog would be ducking , dodging or deflecting into mom's basement

What's it like to have no life?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #663 on: December 05, 2021, 05:03:53 PM »

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #664 on: December 05, 2021, 05:05:21 PM »
I like the way you start off saying the "backyard photos aren’t great quality so one can’t be 100% certain", before then pronouncing you "can clearly see".
Just to clarify - you can't clearly see where the strap is connected to the rifle. The quality of the photo is too poor to discern that. In my view, the way to determine where the strap is connected to the barrel of the rifle is to follow how the strap is hanging from the rifle. Gravity will pull the strap down from the point it is connected to the rifle (IMO).
In the pic below I have highlighted (with a red arrow) where the strap appears to be connected to the rifle.



"As we can clearly see", the strap is connected to the bottom of the barrel of the rifle and not the side. I believe there is a bit of excess strap material that bends off to the right after the connection and it is this you are using for your determination as to where the strap is connected to the rifle.

Researcher, Gil Jesus, has written extensively on the possibility that the Book Depository rifle isn’t the same as the rifle Oswald or “Hidell” ordered. See below