On The Trail Of Delusion

[Vincent Baxter]

However, over the years that pass, Marina frequently tells a different story about the number of photos that she took and when asked for a demonstration, it turns out she doesn't even know how the work the camera.

Hahaha! So, we can't believe Marina's original statement of admitting to taking the BY photos, but when she claimed she didn't even know how to use the camera, that was clearly her telling the God's honest truth and proves she couldn't possibly have taken them?

Do you believe O.J. Simpson was completely innocent too because the gloves wouldn't fit his hands properly when he was asked to demonstrate putting them on in court?

[Martin Weidmann]

Hahaha! So, we can't believe Marina's original statement of admitting to taking the BY photos, but when she claimed she didn't even know how to use the camera, that was clearly her telling the God's honest truth and proves she couldn't possibly have taken them?

Do you believe O.J. Simpson was completely innocent too because the gloves wouldn't fit his hands properly when he was asked to demonstrate putting them on in court?

Hahaha! So, we can't believe Marina's original statement of admitting to taking the BY photos, but when she claimed she didn't even know how to use the camera, that was clearly her telling the God's honest truth and proves she couldn't possibly have taken them?

Next time, please try at least to make some sense. Your paranoid imagination seems to be working overtime. First of all, I believe that the BY photos are most likely genuine, but I am not so sure about the narrative behind it.

In her original statement Marina did not admit taking the BY photos. She admitted to taking only one. Marina also never claimed she did not know how to use the camera. She was in fact asked to show how she worked the camera and she held it completely wrong which indicated that she did not know how to work it.

And nobody claimed that Marina couldn't possibly have taken the photos. You are making up stuff out of thin air.

Do you believe O.J. Simpson was completely innocent too because the gloves wouldn't fit his hands properly when he was asked to demonstrate putting them on in court?

Irrelevant, but let me confuse you with my answer; I believe that O.J. Simpson committed the two murders but he was correctly acquitted by the jury.

[Martin Weidmann]

This is rich considering the source.  Is anyone agreeing with you in those thousands of endless rambling political posts that you have cluttered up this forum with over the years?  In fact, no one even bothers to respond at all.  Are you really suggesting that someone must "hang out" with an historical figure to form any opinion about them?  Do you hang out with President Trump?  That hasn't deterred you from posting thousands of rambling posts about him. 

Again, instead of your silly personal commentary, how about directing us to a single example of Oswald displaying any self-deprecating humor?  And what is the point that you are trying to make here?  That you think Oswald did write "Hunter of Fascists.  HA HA HA" on the BY photos?  You think it's possible that he was making fun of himself by holding a rifle and Commie literature just before trying to kill someone.  Old Ozzie was a barrel of laughs?

Are you really suggesting that someone must "hang out" with an historical figure to form any opinion about them?  Do you hang out with President Trump?  That hasn't deterred you from posting thousands of rambling posts about him. 

What a pathetic comparison. Oswald was a private individual who was not the center of attention on a 24/7 basis. Trump, on the other hand, was and to compare the two is just idiotic.

[Sean Kneringer]

I watched the documentary. Stone doesn't claim the photos are fake, but rather the rifle pictured is not the same one found in the TSBD.

[Rick Plant]

This is rich considering the source.  Is anyone agreeing with you in those thousands of endless rambling political posts that you have cluttered up this forum with over the years?  In fact, no one even bothers to respond at all.  Are you really suggesting that someone must "hang out" with an historical figure to form any opinion about them?  Do you hang out with President Trump?  That hasn't deterred you from posting thousands of rambling posts about him. 

Again, instead of your silly personal commentary, how about directing us to a single example of Oswald displaying any self-deprecating humor?  And what is the point that you are trying to make here?  That you think Oswald did write "Hunter of Fascists.  HA HA HA" on the BY photos?  You think it's possible that he was making fun of himself by holding a rifle and Commie literature just before trying to kill someone.  Old Ozzie was a barrel of laughs?

The point is Richard, you never knew Lee Harvey Oswald personally to know what kind of personality the man had. But you make absolute statements regarding his personality pretending you know everything about him when you never even met him. That is why you are wrong because you have no idea how he interacted with people during his lifetime. 

[Martin Weidmann]

The point is Richard, you never knew Lee Harvey Oswald personally to know what kind of personality the man had. But you make absolute statements regarding his personality pretending you know everything about him when you never even met him. That is why you are wrong because you have no idea how he interacted with people during his lifetime.

because you have no idea how he interacted with people during his lifetime.

Indeed. There is no way that anybody, and that includes "Richard", could possibly know what Oswald was doing on a daily basis, except perhaps when he is known to be at work. For all we know, he could have been meeting with all sorts of people, who, after the assassination would not come forward or even admit knowing Oswald.

[Rick Plant]

because you have no idea how he interacted with people during his lifetime.

Indeed. There is no way that anybody, and that includes "Richard", could possibly know what Oswald was doing on a daily basis, except perhaps when he is known to be at work. For all we know, he could have been meeting with all sorts of people, who, after the assassination would not come forward or even admit knowing Oswald.

That's why Richard Smith's claim that Oswald was "never humorous" is absolutely ridiculous because even the most serious person is capable of cracking a joke.

Good point you made about people possibly not coming forward. Oswald knew people during his lifetime so we have no idea how he acted around certain individuals on a daily basis besides his co-workers that really didn't know him to make an accurate assessment of his personality.

And it's a known fact that people act completely different in a work environment than when they are around their closest friends.       

[Dan O'meara]

I watched the documentary. Stone doesn't claim the photos are fake, but rather the rifle pictured is not the same one found in the TSBD.

Hi Sean, I've not seen the documentary yet, but would like to know what the differences are between the rifle in the BYP and the one found on the 6th floor.
A few members of this forum have made this point but when asked for details they have disappeared.
Demonstrating they are different rifles is a point of great importance.