On The Trail Of Delusion

[Martin Weidmann]

Oswald is not a "private" individual."  He is an historical figure who assassinated the President.  There have been thousands of books, millions of pages, movies/documentaries and several investigations into him and his background/motivations for assassinating JFK.  Many more books and investigations exist relating to Oswald than even a person like Trump.  But Rick's silly point is that it is impossible to reach any conclusion about an individual's private persona unless you know them in person.   And you are apparently not bright enough to realize that the point being made is one supportive of the conclusion that Oswald did not write the "Hunter of Fascist" notation on the BY photo.  A point that you agree with.  You are so fixated on playing the contrarian that you are even interjecting your endless nonsense into this discussion.  How about applying this contrarian mantra to some of Stone's long debunked conspiracies theories?

Oswald is not a "private" individual."  He is an historical figure who assassinated the President.

BS. He only became an historical figure after the assassination. Prior to that he was just an unknown guy.

There have been thousands of books, millions of pages, movies/documentaries and several investigations into him

And they were all written after the fact and are filled by all sorts of speculative opinions of individuals who never met Oswald or only vaguely knew him.

Many more books and investigations exist relating to Oswald than even a person like Trump.

The difference being that the books about Oswald were all written after his death, over a period of half a decade. As far as Trump goes; he is and has been on all sorts of media outlets 24/7. To not understand what kind of a person Trump is, you need to be blind, deaf and ignorant.

But Rick's silly point is that it is impossible to reach any conclusion about an individual's private persona unless you know them in person.

Oh, you can reach a conclusion about anybody, but the likelihood of it being a wrong conclusion increases substantially when you rely on the opinions of others and have never met the person involved.

What is silly is that you compare Oswald who was a private individual to Trump who is a public figure and media freak!

And you are apparently not bright enough to realize that the point being made is one supportive of the conclusion that Oswald did not write the "Hunter of Fascist" notation on the BY photo.

More BS... The "Hunter of Fascist" text was most certainly not written by Oswald. That's a known fact.

To use that finding to support a claim that Oswald was not a humorous person is simply pathetic. You also did not write that text. Does that make you not a humorous person? Of course not.

[Sean Kneringer]

Hi Sean, I've not seen the documentary yet, but would like to know what the differences are between the rifle in the BYP and the one found on the 6th floor.
A few members of this forum have made this point but when asked for details they have disappeared.
Demonstrating they are different rifles is a point of great importance.

Stone claims that the leather strap on the rifle seen in the backyard photos is attached to the bottom of the stock, whereas the one removed from the Depository is attached to the left side of the stock. He also noticed that Lee's wedding or Marine Corps ring is on his right hand in some photos, and on the left in another.

[Bill Chapman]

Knock-Knock.
Who's there?
Roger.
Roger who?
Roger Weidmann.

Knock-Knock.
Who's there?
Roger.
Roger who?
Roger the Dodger

[Martin Weidmann]

Knock-Knock.
Who's there?
Roger.
Roger who?
Roger the Dodger

Look at this... the LNs are showing just how infantile they really are.   

[Bill Chapman]

Look at this... the LNs are showing just how infantile they really are.   

So you didn't play baseball...?
Oh yeah, now I remember; it was dodgeball

[Martin Weidmann]

Good one Bill.  Careful or he might challenge you to a debate!   

And give Brown another possibility to find excuses for running away? That game is getting old.

[Jon Banks]

Look at these incriminating photos of American politicos