On The Trail Of Delusion

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 155308 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #301 on: October 24, 2021, 03:41:36 AM »
You recognize that the "palm print" ( smudge)  on an index card is a "concocted story"....But you refuse to admit that the index card was actually included in the evidence that the DPD turned over to the FBI at midnight on 11/22/63.

I "refuse to admit" that because there is no evidence for it other than a fanciful Walt fabrication.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #302 on: October 24, 2021, 09:49:55 PM »
I "refuse to admit" that because there is no evidence for it other than a fanciful Walt fabrication.

Why don't you drop the "fanciful Walt fabrication" and actually examine the evidence with an open mind?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #303 on: October 24, 2021, 09:59:56 PM »
Why don't you drop the "fanciful Walt fabrication" and actually examine the evidence with an open mind?

I have.  All you have is an undated evidence list and a wild imagination.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #304 on: October 25, 2021, 08:22:01 PM »
I have.  All you have is an undated evidence list and a wild imagination.

I don't consider my imagination to be "wild"....   I simply examine the evidence inventory lists and note that on 11/22/63 the DPD did not know much about the carcano that was found hidden beneath a pallet of books in the TSBD.  It is a fact that the DPD didn't know that it was commonly referred to as a "CARCANO".... So when they listed it on the evidence list they simply referred to it as ....quote-- Italian make 6.5 rifle---unquote  But when they used a photocopy of that original evidence list on 11/26/63 to produce an evidence inventory list they knew that the " Italian make 6.5mm rifle " was commonly called a Carcano carbine so they simply added that bit of information to the photocopy of the original evidence list from 11/22/63.

On 11/22/63, they  simply listed the the S&W revolver that was allegedly taken from LHO at the theater as;  quote--- 1  .38 cal pistol, 2" barrel --- unquote , but when they altered the photocopy of the original evidence inventory list from 11/22/63 they added a lot of information to that simple entry.

When they altered the original list that simply said  "1  .38 cal pistol, 2" barrel "---they added ....S&W, rev. sandblast finish , brown wooden handles, serial # 510210 , released to FBI Agent 11-22-63 and again on 11-26-63 

If you believe that commonsense reasoning is "wild imagination" then you apparently have no reasoning ability .....
« Last Edit: October 25, 2021, 11:10:24 PM by Walt Cakebread »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #305 on: October 26, 2021, 12:07:33 AM »
Lots of people ("Oswald did it" evangelists included) consider their own unsubstantiated speculations to be "common sense reasoning".  Don't be like them.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #306 on: October 26, 2021, 12:41:16 AM »
Lots of people ("Oswald did it" evangelists included) consider their own unsubstantiated speculations to be "common sense reasoning".  Don't be like them.

Can't you see that the original evidence list was compiled to accompany the photos of the evidence that was being released to the FBI at midnight as ordered by LBJ.  ( recall that LBJ told Curry that the FBI was taking charge of the investigation at midnight)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #307 on: October 26, 2021, 01:12:27 AM »
Can't you see that the original evidence list was compiled to accompany the photos of the evidence that was being released to the FBI at midnight as ordered by LBJ.  ( recall that LBJ told Curry that the FBI was taking charge of the investigation at midnight)

No, because there was no mention of the magic partial palmprint by Day or anybody else that night.