On The Trail Of Delusion

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 155305 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #315 on: October 26, 2021, 10:13:35 PM »
The list says nothing about these things being released to the FBI or when.

That's ridiculous..... It is an established fact that the FBI took over the case at midnight, and all of the evidence was released to the FBI at that time.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #316 on: October 27, 2021, 02:56:08 AM »
There's zero evidence that the alleged partial palmprint on an index card was turned over at that time or that it even existed at that time.  ZERO.

Offline Ted Shields

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #317 on: October 27, 2021, 04:37:43 PM »
Mark Lane or Jim Jones? Pick somebody ::)

Mark Lane. Dangerous man.

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #318 on: October 27, 2021, 07:29:33 PM »
Mark Lane. Dangerous man.

Please tell us more, Ted.

Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: Why Do Conspiracy Theorists Still Believe Julia Ann Mercer?
« Reply #319 on: October 28, 2021, 01:25:38 AM »
She wouldn't be the first witness to say that she was misquoted in official statements.

A better question would be, "why do WC evangelists automatically believe whatever cops say"?

You should ask one. (If any actually exist) Personally, I don't know of any. If you mean LNs, why do you assume they do automatically believe whatever cops say? Anything to back up that huge assumption?

PS Seen the expression "evangelists" in a few of your posts now..new buzzword?
« Last Edit: October 28, 2021, 01:30:21 AM by Denis Pointing »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Why Do Conspiracy Theorists Still Believe Julia Ann Mercer?
« Reply #320 on: October 28, 2021, 04:51:01 AM »
You should ask one. (If any actually exist) Personally, I don't know of any. If you mean LNs, why do you assume they do automatically believe whatever cops say? Anything to back up that huge assumption?

PS Seen the expression "evangelists" in a few of your posts now..new buzzword?

Not particularly new.  The "Oswald did it" position is a religion.  With a creed and inerrant holy books.

Yes, read Litwin's article.  His entire argument is that nobody should believe Mercer because the cops (or the FBI who are cops) said something different.  And they didn't even say anything that different.  There was a truck there at that time and somebody probably took something out of the back of it.  So why is there such a drive amongst the WC faithful to discredit and try to destroy any witness who could be at odds with the official narrative?

Offline Ted Shields

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
Re: Mark Lane Interviews Roger Craig
« Reply #321 on: October 28, 2021, 12:45:24 PM »
Please tell us more, Ted.

He spent months (being paid by Jim Jones all the while) pushing unfounded opinions of conspiracy to Jones and the Peoples Temple. "The CIA are after you", "they've plans for you" and such. Making an already paranoid and crazy man (Jones) more paranoid and crazy. Theres no doubt that Lanes "work" contributed to the tragedy. He has blood on his hands.