Not particularly new. The "Oswald did it" position is a religion. With a creed and inerrant holy books.Yes, read Litwin's article. His entire argument is that nobody should believe Mercer because the cops (or the FBI who are cops) said something different. And they didn't even say anything that different. There was a truck there at that time and somebody probably took something out of the back of it. So why is there such a drive amongst the WC faithful to discredit and try to destroy any witness who could be at odds with the official narrative?
"religion" "creed" "holy books" "evangelist"
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/why-do-conspiracy-theorists-still-believe-julia-ann-mercer
Theres no doubt that Lanes "work" contributed to the tragedy. He has blood on his hands.
The list says nothing about these things being released to the FBI or when.
I tend to accept the official story when it smells to high heaven.The official story holds that the DPD released a number of items to the FBI on 11-22-63 without making a list or receiving a signed receipt. The FBI subsequently discussed these items in Airtels and made a report on these items but no signed list was ever discussed or produced. There is a note on one of the DPD crime lab reports that some of the items were released to Vince Drain that evening, but this is not a complete list of what was supposedly released.But one of the problems exposed by this mess is the palm print reportedly cut from Box D, the seat box. This was reportedly removed from the box on the afternoon of the 22nd, and verified as Oswald's print that evening. And yet this print was not sent to the FBI for verification that evening. Nor was it photographed in situ in the building. Nor was it photographed at the DPD that evening. Nor is there an 11-22-63 DPD report in which this verification is noted. There is simply a claim that they removed it from a box found in the sniper's nest, and that it matched Oswald's palm print. I must admit I'm a skeptic.
Dittos and re-posted by Jerry Freeman
