The First Shot

[Tom Graves]

[...]

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

You really should self-publish a book.

(LOL)

-- Tom

[Tom Graves]

When one performs even a cursory review of the statements regarding the movements within the limousine at the time of the first shot, one finds that 44 of these [statements?] indicated Kennedy had a reaction to the first shot. Not one indicated he just sat there waving or looked around and resumed waving.

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

How many of these people remembered to mention that they'd heard a firecracker, or a backfire, or a tire blowout, or a [fill in the blank] shortly after the limo turned onto Elm Street?

Hmm?

-- Tom

[Dan O'meara]

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

How many of these people remembered to mention that they'd heard a firecracker, or a backfire, or a tire blowout, or a [fill in the blank] shortly after the limo turned onto Elm Street?

Hmm?

-- Tom

Well, why don't you read through the list lil tommy and count them up yourself.
As usual, you've missed the point.
Speer has compiled a list of 44 witnesses who recall JFK reacting as we see in the Z-film - arms moving upwards, slumping to the left, straightening up etc.
He also points out that not a single witness recalls him carrying on waving and smiling after the first shot.
It's a list of 44 witnesses confirming that the first shot was the one that caused JFK to have the extreme reaction we see in the Z-film.

Look at the Tyler/Speer evidence a few posts back, look at the OP.
How much evidence can you ignore?
Don't you feel weird ignoring all this evidence?
What does it say about you as a researcher?