Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Andrew Mason, Jarrett Smith

Author Topic: The First Shot  (Read 503776 times)

Online Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1614
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1610 on: Today at 01:20:11 PM »
My understanding is that psychologists in at least 37 states are now using the Z film instead of Rorschach blobs because the interpretations are so much more diverse and interesting. Anyone who doesn't find these discussions hysterical needs to binge watch Monty Python reruns.

(Thanks to Duncan for creating a separate Weirdness subforum, which shall apparently henceforth be known as Lance's Private Playground!  :D)
« Last Edit: Today at 01:22:13 PM by Lance Payette »

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1611 on: Today at 01:33:33 PM »
Herein is your problem. You put all your faith in fallible witnesses and reject what the Z-film tells you unmistakably. The Z-film is more reliable than 20 witnesses because it has perfect recall.

We don't have to look to other events to find more than 20 witnesses getting something wrong. More than 20 witnesses said all the shots came from the GK. More than 20 witnesses said all the shots came from the direction of the TSBD. They can't both be right. So there's your example of more than 20 witnesses getting a pertinent fact wrong.
First of all, determining direction of a sound is not a simple observable fact, especially in Dealey Plaza. Second, the apparent direction depended on the location of the listener. Third, many of the witnesses said they couldn't tell but still offered a a guess. Finally, this is not an example where there were zero who observed it correctly.

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1612 on: Today at 02:42:24 PM »
First of all, determining direction of a sound is not a simple observable fact, especially in Dealey Plaza. Second, the apparent direction depended on the location of the listener. Third, many of the witnesses said they couldn't tell but still offered a a guess. Finally, this is not an example where there were zero who observed it correctly.

Nice job of cherry picking what you are willing to believe from witnesses. The reality is witnesses get all kinds of things wrong. The typical witness, if there is such a thing, will get some things right and some things wrong. That's why anything and everything witnesses tell us needs corroboration before it should be accepted. To you, corroboration means the witness tells a story that conforms with your ridiculous scenario that only you believe.

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1613 on: Today at 04:06:46 PM »
Nice job of cherry picking what you are willing to believe from witnesses. The reality is witnesses get all kinds of things wrong. The typical witness, if there is such a thing, will get some things right and some things wrong. That's why anything and everything witnesses tell us needs corroboration before it should be accepted. To you, corroboration means the witness tells a story that conforms with your ridiculous scenario that only you believe.
I can tell that you have not worked much with witnesses.  While it is true that witnesses can be and often are wrong on details, and some lie, honest witnesses rarely hallucinate the same hallucination. At least not in my experience. Have you thought about what caused so many people to have had the same wrong recollection of the first shot occurring while JFK was waving to the crowd on his right and then moving to his left?

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #1614 on: Today at 05:50:39 PM »
I can tell that you have not worked much with witnesses.  While it is true that witnesses can be and often are wrong on details, and some lie, honest witnesses rarely hallucinate the same hallucination. At least not in my experience. Have you thought about what caused so many people to have had the same wrong recollection of the first shot occurring while JFK was waving to the crowd on his right and then moving to his left?

I have never claimed any of the witnesses had an hallucination. Why would you imply I had? I simply point out the established fact that witnesses don't remember events perfectly. They tend to get some things wrong and some things right. I don't know why people had the same wrong misperception. I know people did have the same wrong perceptions and I can only speculate as to why and speculations don't establish anything. I don't know why some people reacted to the first shot and others did not. Clint Hill doesn't remember hearing the first shot but Glen Bennett, riding in the same car, clearly did hear it. So did JBC. So did Rosemary Willis.