Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Zeon Mason]

How many photo discrepancies are required before it’s reasonable to declare It’s evidence of a purposeful alteration to hide some one or some object, so as not to interfere with the WC lone nut Oswald the shooter theory?

[Dan O'meara]

How many photo discrepancies are required before it’s reasonable to declare It’s evidence of a purposeful alteration to hide some one or some object, so as not to interfere with the WC lone nut Oswald the shooter theory?

One

[Dan O'meara]

Lol.

Mr O'Meara has just confirmed that

a) he is completely, mortifiyingly, infuriatingly unable to offer an explanation for the shadow down Mr Lovelady in Wiegman

b) the sentence in my post #711 ("Is this image-----broadcast the evening of the assassination-----the closest the American public has ever come to seeing what the original Altgens 6 showed?") overwhelms his reading comprehension abilities.

No wonder the poor guy has nothing to bring to a thread titled "Then went outside to watch P. parade" beyond irrelevant, outdated 2FLRE talking points!

Let's leave Mr Ford and his new theory behind.
Nobody is going to accept Oswald was actually African American.
Let's get back to the Hoax Thoery.
Those who propose there was a Hoax must show the reality of the thing they are proposing.
Who has any evidence regarding the origins of the Hoax?
Who organised the Hoax?
Who knew about the Hoax?
Who was taking part in the Hoax?

[John Iacoletti]

Nobody is going to accept Oswald was actually African American.

You haven’t presented a compelling argument that that appendage is African American. Or any argument at all, really.

[Alan Ford]

Let's leave Mr Ford and his new theory behind.
Nobody is going to accept Oswald was actually African American.
Let's get back to the Hoax Thoery.
Those who propose there was a Hoax must show the reality of the thing they are proposing.
Who has any evidence regarding the origins of the Hoax?
Who organised the Hoax?
Who knew about the Hoax?
Who was taking part in the Hoax?

Further weak cope from Mr O'Meara, who really really really doesn't want us to talk about his inability to explain the Lovelady shadow in Wiegman! 

[Dan O'meara]

You haven’t presented a compelling argument that that appendage is African American. Or any argument at all, really.

When I say that Alan is presenting a new theory that Oswald was African American I'm clearly having a bit of fun. Don't you see that you sad, sad man.
Alan has used a 'bleached-out', overly brightened copy of Altgens to argue the appendage in question belongs to Oswald.
He also posted a 'normal' copy of Altgens which shows the same appendage belongs to a non-white person.
I find it funny that he's got himself into such a predicament so I'm making fun of it.
Don't you get it?

 

[John Iacoletti]

I’ve seen the “normal” copy of Altgens, and I still want to know how you know that “appendage” belongs to an African American.

[Bill Chapman]

The Blob