Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )  (Read 694878 times)

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )
« Reply #161 on: July 30, 2020, 10:35:26 AM »
Actually the famous wallet footage to me doesn't even look like a wallet. Its not Oswalds anyway cos as Dale Myers pointed out, small details are different on the wallet than the wallet Oswald owned.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )
« Reply #162 on: July 30, 2020, 04:52:45 PM »
Actually the famous wallet footage to me doesn't even look like a wallet. Its not Oswalds anyway cos as Dale Myers pointed out, small details are different on the wallet than the wallet Oswald owned.

Which wallet?  He allegedly had several.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8205
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )
« Reply #163 on: July 30, 2020, 09:35:36 PM »
Actually the famous wallet footage to me doesn't even look like a wallet. Its not Oswalds anyway cos as Dale Myers pointed out, small details are different on the wallet than the wallet Oswald owned.

Actually the famous wallet footage to me doesn't even look like a wallet.

Doesn't matter what it looks like to you. FBI agent Bob Barrett confirms there was a wallet and he was at the scene and actually saw it. That trumps what you think.

Its not Oswalds anyway cos as Dale Myers pointed out

Myers can point out anything he likes, but he wasn't there and thus only has an opinion and a biased opinion at that.

small details are different on the wallet than the wallet Oswald owned.

On what wallet are the details different than on Oswald's wallet?

How can those two wallets be compared when only one wallet (claimed to be Oswald's) is in the National Archive?

How in the world does Myers even know which wallet is Oswald's?
« Last Edit: July 30, 2020, 09:37:46 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Frederick Clements

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )
« Reply #164 on: July 31, 2020, 05:03:21 PM »
 The mere fact that this note was hidden from public view for decades is enough to tell us something.

Fred

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )
« Reply #165 on: July 31, 2020, 11:33:58 PM »
Mr. LOVELADY - Well, I went over and got my lunch and went upstairs and got a coke and come on back down.

This probably accounts for the coke bottle on the steps.

That is a possibility, Mr. O'meara, but given Mr. Lovelady's penchant for lying, and the fact his testimony came five months after the assassination ----->

The testimony of Billy Nolan Lovelady was taken at 3:50 p.m., on April 7, 1964, in the office of the U.S. attorney, 301 Post Office Building, Bryan and Ervay Streets, Dallas, Tex., by Messrs. Joseph A. Ball and Samuel A. Stern, assistant counsel of the President's Commission.

it wouldn't surprise that the mechanisms by then to remove any trace of Prayer Man standing there out front in the entrance would already be well underway, thus his coke bottle morphs into yet another misleading falsehood to remove him from the scene.

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )
« Reply #166 on: July 31, 2020, 11:38:37 PM »
Then went outside to watch P. parade -- Lee Harvey Oswald

If Oswald said that, then it must be true

Mr. Chapman, please view the astute response by Mr. Ford in Reply No. 133 within this thread (pg 14)

Offline Alan J. Ford

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
    • RFK's Final Journey
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )
« Reply #167 on: August 01, 2020, 12:01:45 AM »
The mere fact that this note was hidden from public view for decades is enough to tell us something.

Fred

Well said, Mr. Clements, an astute assessment.

Anything revealing the truth about his innocence would certainly be hidden. A very telling dynamic. The wrongly accused didn't shoot anybody. Anybody.