Fragments

[John Iacoletti]

Hinrich is wrong is what

Why? Because the same bullet strike must account for both reactions? Sounds circular.

[Thomas Graves]

Why? Because the same bullet strike must account for both reactions? Sounds circular.

Iacoletti,

Which one of the ten or so bullets that struck JFK in the evil, evil, evil CIA's triangulated fusillade do you think caused him to raise his elbows like that?

--  MWT 

[Bill Chapman]

Why? Because the same bullet strike must account for both reactions? Sounds circular.

Hinrich has presented z228 in absence of the immediately preceding frames. Thus a claim of a z288 second reaction should at least raise one's eyebrows somewhat.

[John Iacoletti]

You didn’t raise your eyebrows, you called him wrong. He showed where he saw a back impact. You’re pointing out a raising of his hands towards his throat. Two different observations.

P.S. it’s Hinrichs

[Bill Chapman]

You didn’t raise your eyebrows, you called him wrong. He showed where he saw a back impact. You’re pointing out a raising of his hands towards his throat. Two different observations.

P.S. it’s Hinrichs

Stop trying to mangle what I said

I indeed called him wrong. And I raised my eyebrows when I saw that he didn't include the immediate preceding frames which indicate hands rising before z228. And suggested eyebrows should at least be raised at his obvious attempt to mislead.

[John Iacoletti]

There’s no attempt to mislead. He didn’t say that was Kennedy’s first and only reaction to anything. You’re just injecting your own assumptions onto him.

[Thomas Graves]

There’s no attempt to mislead. He didn’t say that was Kennedy’s first and only reaction to anything. You’re just injecting your own assumptions onto him.

Iacoletti,

How do you know for sure that there was no attempt to mislead? Can you read minds?

--  MWT 

PS  At which Z-frame do YOU think JFK probably started "raising his hands towards his neck"?

No opinion?