This is how the rifle was gotten into the building

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building  (Read 127125 times)

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #140 on: May 18, 2020, 12:24:11 AM »
Marty,

Is there any evidence that you particularly like?

The "altered" x-rays that "prove" the fatal head shot (or shots???) came from somewhere other than The Sniper's Nest, for example?

You mean the "altered" x-rays that plugged a "fist-sized hole in the back of his head", which more than a dozen medical staff noticed? Or were they all standing too close to the x-ray machine?

Quote
The photos of "pristine" CE399?

You mean CE-399, which didn't have a straight line path from the SN into JFK's back at the T1 vertebrae and out his throat at C7, then thru Connally causing 7 wounds and smashing thru bones and dropping out of Connally onto the wrong stretcher in "pristine" condition, while the other FMJ bullet disintegrated as it exploded in JFK's head?

Quote
Oswald's saying on film, "I'm just a patsy!"?

He would know, but I agree that one is hearsay. But wouldn't the avg Joe just claim innocence?


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #141 on: May 18, 2020, 12:47:10 AM »
You mean the "altered" x-rays that plugged a "fist-sized hole in the back of his head", which more than a dozen medical staff noticed? Or were they all standing too close to the x-ray machine?

You mean CE-399, which didn't have a straight line path from the SN into JFK's back at the T1 vertebrae and out his throat at C7, then thru Connally causing 7 wounds and smashing thru bones and dropping out of Connally onto the wrong stretcher in "pristine" condition, while the other FMJ bullet disintegrated as it exploded in JFK's head?

He would know, but I agree that one is hearsay. But wouldn't the avg Joe just claim innocence?

wouldn't the avg Joe just claim innocence?

Who Knows?....  But I think you're right....  Lee KNEW that he had been set up...    He was playing the same game that he'd played at Walker's back in April, and realized that he'd been a sucker.   That's why he said, I'm just a patsy.    When he said that, his fate was sealed....The conspirators knew that they had to snuff him ASAP.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2020, 12:48:28 AM by Walt Cakebread »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #142 on: May 18, 2020, 12:49:57 AM »
Neither is your fantasy that Oswald created a bag that was too small because he didn’t know how long the rifle was.

It's not a "fantasy": it's a "possibility".

FANTASY: a pleasant but unlikely situation that you enjoy thinking about, or the activity of thinking in this way

POSSIBILITY: a chance that something may happen or be true

John,

If you could improve your comprehension of English, your comments could make more sense? Additionally, you would not need to make so many of them. You'd have more time for more worthwhile pursuits.

It's really good of you to acknowledge that engaging you isn't a worthwhile pursuit.   Thumb1:

Btw, is it your foolish position that a fantasy, i.e. a pleasant but unlikely situation, can never be the same as a possibility, in as much as that a fantasy can never happen or come true?
« Last Edit: May 18, 2020, 12:56:36 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #143 on: May 18, 2020, 12:55:11 AM »
It's really good of you to acknowledge that engaging you isn't a worthwhile pursuit.   Thumb1:

It's really good of you to acknowledge that engaging you isn't a worthwhile pursuit.

That's not a totally accurate interpretation of the meaning I meant to convey.

I welcome comments: Just not silly generalizations.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #144 on: May 18, 2020, 12:57:59 AM »
It's really good of you to acknowledge that engaging you isn't a worthwhile pursuit.

That's not a totally accurate interpretation of the meaning I meant to convey.

I welcome comments: Just not silly generalizations.

That's not a totally accurate interpretation of the meaning I meant to convey.

Then you should have written it differently, because as it is written now that is exactly the meaning you are conveying.

And btw, by, rather arrogantly stating in advance what you will "welcome" and what not, only confirms that it's not worthwhile to engage you. That being said, I admit that I am now officially wasting my time, talking to you. It's a feeling I have come to know very well over the past couple of months.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2020, 01:12:19 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #145 on: May 18, 2020, 01:15:43 AM »
A patsy usually isn't completely innocent, just not as portrayed by the conspirators. IOWs, not a lone nut assassin. It was imperative that he was portrayed as a lone nut so the Rooskies wouldn't be accused of starting WWIII, which is why your KGB hypothesis is bunk.

Yes, it was imperative that he be portrayed as a lone nut (which he was), and to not disclose anything that might be construed (correctly) as suggesting that he had been sent back to the U.S. (with a probable KGB-agent wife, according to true-defector Pyotr Deryabin) on a mission to assassinate JFK, and that he had "gone rogue" when Khrushchev tried to call it off.

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: May 18, 2020, 01:16:09 AM by Thomas Graves »

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #146 on: May 18, 2020, 01:38:50 AM »
Yes, it was imperative that he be portrayed as a lone nut (which he was), and to not disclose anything that might be construed (correctly) as suggesting that he had been sent back to the U.S. (with a probable KGB-agent wife, according to true-defector Pyotr Deryabin) on a mission to assassinate JFK, and that he had "gone rogue" when Khrushchev tried to call it off.

--  MWT  ;)

LOL, so you are a CT then (Coincidence Theorist).

And it was just dumb luck that Oswald landed a job in a building along the motorcade route, plus a dozen other "coincidences" that served up JFK on a silver platter to a lone nut. Was Thomas Arthur Vallee a KGB double agent too?

So how many backyard photos did his KGB wife Marina take and why did some of them wind up in the darndest places? Did Khrushchev get one?

You have to be pretty single-minded to think that the KGB could have contrived all the coincidences that led up to the Big Event, but you are like a dog with a bone. In for a penny, I suppose.