This is how the rifle was gotten into the building

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building  (Read 126311 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #126 on: May 16, 2020, 04:21:31 PM »
"Look at the evidence".

Hmm, you mean go to the National Archives, visit The Sixth Floor Museum, and walk around Dealey Plaza for awhile?

Have you read James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio's opinions?

Mark Lane's?

Joachim Joesten's.

John Armstrong's?

How do you deal with evidence that conflicts with your "take"?  Assume that it was manipulated by the evil powers that be to confuse you?

--  MWT  ;)

How dumb is it to ask somebody if he has read the opinions of others, when he has just told you that reading the opinions of others is a waste of time?

Hmm, you mean go to the National Archives, visit The Sixth Floor Museum, and walk around Dealey Plaza for awhile?

Yes. I've done all three in the past. How about you? Or were you too busy in Russia?

How do you deal with evidence that conflicts with your "take"?

What evidence would that be? And what "take" would that be?

This may be a foreign concept to you but I try to make sense of the available evidence and whenever there is a contradiction I try to resolve it. I don't need to make up or agree with some wacky theory and then look for and cherry pick evidence to support it. I'll gladly leave that to others....

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #127 on: May 16, 2020, 05:57:13 PM »
How dumb is it to ask somebody if he has read the opinions of others, when he has just told you that reading the opinions of others is a waste of time?

Hmm, you mean go to the National Archives, visit The Sixth Floor Museum, and walk around Dealey Plaza for awhile?

Yes. I've done all three in the past. How about you? Or were you too busy in Russia?

How do you deal with evidence that conflicts with your "take"?

What evidence would that be? And what "take" would that be?

This may be a foreign concept to you but I try to make sense of the available evidence and whenever there is a contradiction I try to resolve it. I don't need to make up or agree with some wacky theory and then look for and cherry pick evidence to support it. I'll gladly leave that to others....

Marty,

You don't read articles and books about the assassination?

Why are you here?  To educate us?

"In Russia"?

 I'm afraid you're confusing me with Oswald, Marty. 

You know, the former Marine Corps radar operator who spent 2.5 years in The Workers Paradise and came back home with a probable KGB agent wife and admitted on radio that he was a Marxist?

I only made it as far as the Czech Republic, Comrade.

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 06:00:41 PM by Thomas Graves »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #128 on: May 16, 2020, 06:04:37 PM »
Marty,

You don't read articles and books about the assassination?

Why are you here?  To educate us?

In Russia?  I'm afraid you're confusing me with Oswald.  You know, the former Marine Corps radar operator who spent 2.5 years in The Workers Paradise and came back home with a probable KGB agent wife?

I only made it as far as the Czech Republic, Comrade.

--  MWT  ;)

You don't read articles and books about the assassination?

Where did you learn asking stupid questions over and over again?

Why are you here?

Because I want to be

To educate us?

And waste my time? No thank you.

In Russia?  I'm afraid you're confusing me with Oswald.  You know, the former Marine Corps radar operator who spent 2.5 years in The Workers Paradise and came back home with a probable KGB agent wife?

So, you actually believe I could confuse you with a dead person?  :D

I only made it as far as the Czech Republic, Comrade.

What happened? The Russians didn't want you?

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #129 on: May 16, 2020, 06:35:17 PM »
You don't read articles and books about the assassination?

Where did you learn asking stupid questions over and over again?

Why are you here?

Because I want to be

To educate us?

And waste my time? No thank you.

In Russia?  I'm afraid you're confusing me with Oswald.  You know, the former Marine Corps radar operator who spent 2.5 years in The Workers Paradise and came back home with a probable KGB agent wife?

So, you actually believe I could confuse you with a dead person?  :D

I only made it as far as the Czech Republic, Comrade.

What happened? The Russians didn't want you?

Marty,

Is there any evidence that you particularly like?

The "altered" x-rays that "prove" the fatal head shot (or shots???) came from somewhere other than The Sniper's Nest, for example?

The photos of "pristine" CE399?

Oswald's saying on film, "I'm just a patsy!"?

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 06:40:38 PM by Thomas Graves »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #130 on: May 16, 2020, 06:53:14 PM »
Marty,

Is there any evidence that you particularly like?

The "altered" x-rays that "prove" the fatal head shot (or shots???) came from somewhere other than The Sniper's Nest, for example?

The photos of "pristine" CE399?

Oswald's saying on film, "I'm just a patsy!"?

--  MWT  ;)

Is there any evidence that you particularly like?

Nope... now go and find somebody else to play your pathetic games with. I'm done with this conversation (if that's what it was)
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 09:05:34 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #131 on: May 16, 2020, 07:14:35 PM »
Is there any evidence that you particularly like?

Nope... now go and fine [sic] somebody else to play your pathetic games with. I'm done with this conversation (if that's what it was)

Marty,

But you said, in so many words, that you eschew reading articles and books about the assassination in deference to "looking at the evidence" so that you can "make up your own mind".

There must be some evidence that you like to look at and think about, right?

Perhaps if only for the fact that it's "all been altered or planted," or some-such thing?

What evidence, "altered" or not, do you like to ... think about?

Maybe you no longer need to do that because you've already made up your mind?

LOL

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: May 18, 2020, 01:07:18 AM by Thomas Graves »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: This is how the rifle was gotten into the building
« Reply #132 on: May 16, 2020, 08:13:36 PM »
Marty,

But you said, in so many words, that you eschew articles and books about the assassination in deference to "looking at" the evidence and trying to figure it out by yourself.

There must be some evidence that you like to look at and think about, right?

Perhaps if only for the fact that it's "all been altered or planted," or some-such thing?

What evidence, "altered" or not, do you like to ... think about?

Maybe you no longer need to do that because you've already made up your mind?

LOL

--  MWT  ;)

Ok... I'll give it another try....

There must be some evidence that you like to look at and think about, right?

Why must I like some evidence?

The evidence is what it is. I have no preference one way or the other. Only people with a pre-determined conclusion and/or a bias think along the lines of liking evidence or not.

Get it now, dumbhead?