This is how the rifle was gotten into the building

[Martin Weidmann]

Marty,

You're either contradicting yourself, or you're saying you don't trust any of the evidence.

Which is it?

You're the one who suggested you believe in looking at the evidence and then making up your mind as to what you think it suggests.

Evidently you've made up your mind that Oswald was innocent.

How did you arrive at that conclusion if you don't "like" any of the (potentially) exculpatory evidence?

Because you think all of the evidence is untrustworthy, and therefore must have been fiddled with by The Bad Guys, and therefore there must have been a conspiracy?

Question:  Do you think Oswald was a witting part of that conspiracy?

An unwitting "patsy"?

Just in the wrong place at the wrong time?

--  MWT 

You're either contradicting yourself, or you're saying you don't trust any of the evidence.

No, I am not contradicting myself nor have have ever said anything of the kind. What I can, and will, say is that you should stop making stuff up, just for the sake of a pathetic argument.

Evidently you've made up your mind that Oswald was innocent.

Oh boy, one more idiot who thinks he knows what's in my mind. When and where did I ever say that I considered Oswald innocent or guilty?

The answer is: I didn't. Now go away and pester somebody else.

[Thomas Graves]

You're either contradicting yourself, or you're saying you don't trust any of the evidence.

No, I am not contradicting myself nor have have ever said anything of the kind. What I can, and will, say is that you should stop making stuff up, just for the sake of a pathetic argument.

Evidently you've made up your mind that Oswald was innocent.

Oh boy, one more idiot who thinks he knows what's in my mind. When and where did I ever say that I considered Oswald innocent or guilty?

The answer is: I didn't. No go away and pester somebody else.

Marty,

You and John Iacoletti would make an ideal pro rasslin' tag-team, metaphorically speaking.

Neither of you evidently have the gonads to proclaim Oswald innocent, but you lobby incessantly for that unsupported-by-evidence supposition.

LOL

--  MWT 

[John Iacoletti]

You say "In my mind this is nothing but a contrived excuse...".

In your mind: That's not evidence.

Neither is your fantasy that Oswald created a bag that was too small because he didn’t know how long the rifle was.

[John Iacoletti]

Chapman knows that a nobody shot a somebody in Dealey Plaza that day and has legions of worshippers crying about him to this very day. To the point of even taking a knee at his gravesite.

Well, in one instance anyway.

Chapman doesn’t know squat.

[Jack Trojan]

Marty,

You and John Iacoletti would make an ideal pro rasslin' tag-team, metaphorically speaking.

Neither of you evidently have the gonads to proclaim Oswald innocent, but you lobby incessantly for that unsupported-by-evidence supposition.

LOL

--  MWT 

A patsy usually isn't completely innocent, just not as portrayed by the conspirators. IOWs, not a lone nut assassin. It was imperative that he was portrayed as a lone nut so the Rooskies wouldn't be accused of starting WWIII, which is why your KGB hypothesis is bunk.

[Ross Lidell]

Neither is your fantasy that Oswald created a bag that was too small because he didn’t know how long the rifle was.

Neither is your fantasy that Oswald created a bag that was too small because he didn’t know how long the rifle was.

It's not a "fantasy": it's a "possibility".

FANTASY: a pleasant but unlikely situation that you enjoy thinking about, or the activity of thinking in this way

POSSIBILITY: a chance that something may happen or be true

John,

If you could improve your comprehension of English, your comments could make more sense? Additionally, you would not need to make so many of them. You'd have more time for more worthwhile pursuits.

[Jack Trojan]

Marty,

Is there any evidence that you particularly like?

The "altered" x-rays that "prove" the fatal head shot (or shots???) came from somewhere other than The Sniper's Nest, for example?

You mean the "altered" x-rays that plugged a "fist-sized hole in the back of his head", which more than a dozen medical staff noticed? Or were they all standing too close to the x-ray machine?

The photos of "pristine" CE399?

You mean CE-399, which didn't have a straight line path from the SN into JFK's back at the T1 vertebrae and out his throat at C7, then thru Connally causing 7 wounds and smashing thru bones and dropping out of Connally onto the wrong stretcher in "pristine" condition, while the other FMJ bullet disintegrated as it exploded in JFK's head?

Oswald's saying on film, "I'm just a patsy!"?

He would know, but I agree that one is hearsay. But wouldn't the avg Joe just claim innocence?