Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read  (Read 23859 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #80 on: April 26, 2020, 02:01:51 AM »
Advertisement
Give a Marine sharpshooter 9 or 10 seconds and have the target slow down dramatically before the last shot. Something tells me the success rate will skyrocket.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Restraint-Strait-Straight-Jacket-Black-2XL/140353152042?hash=item20adb3242a:g:aAgAAOSwWy1c6SRi


Give a Marine sharpshooter 9 or 10 seconds and have the target slow down dramatically before the last shot. Something tells me the success rate will skyrocket.


You don't have a clue, or I doubt you would say something so stupid....  A bolt action mannlicher carcano with a scope mounted askew, and iron sights that are totally different than the peep sights on a M-1 Garand could be handed to a Marine Corp EXPERT and he couldn't have hit JFK as you believe Lee Oswald did.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #80 on: April 26, 2020, 02:01:51 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #81 on: April 26, 2020, 08:19:16 PM »
Yeah, I can see why Sibert and O'Neill -- under the influence of CT kooks espousing theories and going by the CT interpretation of a "low" back wound in the autopsy photos -- would "move" the C7 entry wound several inches lower than it actually was.

They got to another law-enforcement "official" with the "low" back wound stuff: Mark Fuhrman (re: "A Simple Act of Murder").

Why do you suppose your “CT kooks” are so influential?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #82 on: April 26, 2020, 08:51:43 PM »
Why do you suppose your “CT kooks” are so influential?

We have the autopsy face sheet that was created by Commander Boswell DURING the autopsy which clearly shows the back wound as being about six inches below the nape of JFK's neck.   

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #82 on: April 26, 2020, 08:51:43 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2629
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #83 on: April 26, 2020, 09:59:26 PM »
We have the autopsy face sheet that was created by Commander Boswell DURING the autopsy which clearly shows the back wound as being about six inches below the nape of JFK's neck.

   The Face Sheet corresponds with the JFK Autopsy Photos. Short of standing JFK on his head inside the Limo, there is NO WAY a Downward fired shot Striking the BACK, then somehoe Exits the throat at a level Above the tie knot. This line of thought is completely Looney Tunes.

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2312
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #84 on: April 27, 2020, 12:30:32 AM »
We have the autopsy face sheet that was created by Commander Boswell DURING the autopsy which clearly shows the back wound as being about six inches below the nape of JFK's neck.

But Boswell himself thought the face sheet markings were approximate and the measurements were what was important.



It's possible the "face sheet" misleading marking with regards to the "back" wound was what Rankin was referring to when he said the back wound was below the shoulder blade.

   The Face Sheet corresponds with the JFK Autopsy Photos. Short of standing JFK on his head inside the Limo, there is NO WAY a Downward fired shot Striking the BACK, then somehoe Exits the throat at a level Above the tie knot. This line of thought is completely Looney Tunes.

No. The "face sheet" placement of the "back" wound is much lower when compared to the autopsy photo. The photo shows the distance from the wound to the mastoid tip and the tip of the scapula to be equal. This was recorded (presumably accurately) as an equal distance and presented in the autopsy report.

    "This wound is measured to be 14 cm. from the tip of the right acromion
      process and 14 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process."

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #84 on: April 27, 2020, 12:30:32 AM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2629
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #85 on: April 27, 2020, 12:34:30 AM »

   You can Not have it both ways. Either you want to be "dead on, balls accurate" with Everything or You do Not. If you are going to be "dead on, balls accurate", then we have a Huge Issue with the size of the bullet hole in JFK's skull.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #86 on: April 27, 2020, 01:26:39 AM »
   The Face Sheet corresponds with the JFK Autopsy Photos. Short of standing JFK on his head inside the Limo, there is NO WAY a Downward fired shot Striking the BACK, then somehoe Exits the throat at a level Above the tie knot. This line of thought is completely Looney Tunes.

The bullet holes in JFK's jacket and shirt match the location shown on JFK's back on the face sheet.....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #86 on: April 27, 2020, 01:26:39 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #87 on: April 27, 2020, 01:35:53 AM »
Give a Marine sharpshooter 9 or 10 seconds and have the target slow down dramatically before the last shot.
Anyone who knows anything about the Marine Corps knows that every Marine must qualify as a rifleman.
Lee Oswald did not go to the infantry. So he was not consequently a very dedicated killer in that regard.
Marines must also train to swim. Where on record was Oswald's swimming interests?
I mean seriously--- he went to radar school...not exactly a blood and guts Seal type vocation.
Furthermore no one has ever feasibly explained why a lone shooter would not drill his target right between the eyes when they had the chance.