Idiot! Nobody is debating who has authority over the sign. You said it was Oak Cliff and you were wrong.
Stop wasting everybody's time with your drivel.
In which we are told that "Nobody is debating who has authority over the sign." But without missing a beat Martin/Roger can't help himself but goes on to address who he believes - wait for it - wait for it - has authority over the sign. HA HA HA. More gold. And he informs us with no authority whatsoever that Oak Cliff doesn't have any authority over signs on their own public streets? I'm sure that is news to them. But again, that kind of idiocy proves my original point. Kooks want to limit their ramblings to an Internet forum because they have a dim realization of how absurd they really are. Prove me wrong though and share your nutty concern with the real world. Take it up with whomever you believe has authority over that sign and stop crying here about it. Just convince them with your contrarian arguments that there is doubt. You can do it Roger! You aren't just some Internet loon who spends all his waking time on a JFK assassination forum. Right? Let us know the results.
