Shells, rifle, SN... Who?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?  (Read 186585 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #21 on: March 21, 2020, 12:25:17 AM »
Mr Trojan...Are you visually impaired?    There are dozens of photos that clearly show that the rifle that was recovered from beneath the boxes on the sixth floor was without any doubt a model 91/38 Mannlicher Carcano.  The earliest photos were taken by Tom Alyea and they show Lt Day dusting a MANNLICHER CARCANO with finger print powder.

But unless you extract your head....you'll never see that this is the truth.

Pls extract your own head, I'm talking about the 1st rifle they found, which was the token rifle that someone took a few shots with from the SN. The Carcano never fired a shot. Fritz was supposed to avoid finding the Mauser but you know how inept the DPD was. They passed it off as one of theirs.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #22 on: March 21, 2020, 01:39:17 PM »
Pls extract your own head, I'm talking about the 1st rifle they found, which was the token rifle that someone took a few shots with from the SN. The Carcano never fired a shot

Fritz was supposed to avoid finding the Mauser but you know how inept the DPD was. They passed it off as one of theirs.

There was only ONE rifle found on the sixth floor....   And two,  6.5 mm spent shells.    Weitzman and Boone found the 6.5mm CARCANO where it had been well hidden beneath a pallet of book boxes.  There are many photos that clearly show the rifle is a 6.5mm Model 91/38 Mannlicher Carcano short rifle.

Do you think the conspirators would have been so stupid that they would have planted the spent 6.5mm Carcano shells and then planted a rifle of a different caliber???     Even Roger Craig admitted that it wouldn't have made logical sense to plant spent shells that didn't fit the rifle.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2020, 03:30:45 PM by Walt Cakebread »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2020, 05:52:19 PM »
Mr Trojan...Are you visually impaired?    There are dozens of photos that clearly show that the rifle that was recovered from beneath the boxes on the sixth floor was without any doubt a model 91/38 Mannlicher Carcano.  The earliest photos were taken by Tom Alyea and they show Lt Day dusting a MANNLICHER CARCANO with finger print powder.

If you really think you can identify a specific brand and model number from the fuzzy, washed out Alyea film then you have quite an imagination.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #24 on: March 21, 2020, 05:55:17 PM »
There was only ONE rifle found on the sixth floor....   And two,  6.5 mm spent shells.    Weitzman and Boone found the 6.5mm CARCANO where it had been well hidden beneath a pallet of book boxes.  There are many photos that clearly show the rifle is a 6.5mm Model 91/38 Mannlicher Carcano short rifle.

According to whom, you? Why do you persist in trusting the recollections of the DPD? The ONLY trustworthy person was maybe Alyea but did he film Roger Craig misreading the barrel of the MC and say 7.65mm Mauser instead of 6.5mm Carcano? Personally, I don't know who to believe. But I certainly can't definitively claim a Mauser wasn't found and Craig made it all up.

Quote
Do you think the conspirators would have been so stupid that they would have planted the spent 6.5mm Carcano shells and then planted a rifle of a different caliber???     Even Roger Craig admitted that it wouldn't have made logical sense to plant spent shells that didn't fit the rifle.

Yes I do think they were that stupid and their intention was to NOT find the Mauser, which Fritz knew was there and where not to look. But some other DPD Keystone Cop who didn't pay attention at the briefing found it. Of course I can't be sure if there was a Mauser but neither can you. Otherwise, you have to explain what orifice Roger Craig pulled "7.65" from.  Extract your head and let me know.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2020, 05:58:43 PM by Jack Trojan »

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2020, 08:33:18 PM »



Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2020, 08:39:39 PM »



Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2020, 09:44:00 PM »
Seymour 'saw less' than he should have according to his later statements. He said he saw the bolt action and assumed it a Mauser, the de facto standard for bolt-action rifles of that era. The Carcano had a similar appearance, but even if he had only heard rumours about the Carcano bad reputation (let alone knowing it at-a-glance) he would, arguably, assume a Mauser would be used over said Carcano in a Kennedy assassination attempt.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2020, 09:55:40 PM by Bill Chapman »