Shells, rifle, SN... Who?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?  (Read 186550 times)

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1167
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #434 on: April 19, 2020, 07:12:30 PM »
Roger is saying that he saw "stamped right there on the barrel was the inscription "&.65 Mauser"

He didn't say that until many years later. Never said it at all at the WC.

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #435 on: April 19, 2020, 11:26:16 PM »
He didn't say that until many years later. Never said it at all at the WC.

Didn't 2 deputy sheriffs say the same thing? One being deputy sheriff Seymour Weitzman, who wrote in his report the next day that he found a 7.65 Mauser?  Three men with firearms experience all claimed the same thing. What are the odds? Clearly evidence was being planted all around. So isn't plausible that there could have really been a Mauser?

How many other rifles were seen at the TBD that day?

Here's a Remington Model 8 .. why was it there? https://photos.app.goo.gl/HBy3YVL2NffW9GNt8

What need did the police have for bringing rifles into the TBD? There were plenty of cops with handguns, right?

Is this another rifle in the TBD between boxes? https://photos.app.goo.gl/mVjHy5SG8XHWkXYU7

This guy has a rifle (or maybe a shotgun) https://photos.app.goo.gl/Uz1FoKrL8DNoWifQ6

And there's evidence of 2 Carcano's  https://photos.app.goo.gl/bNNQv5MiFtn9sK7t7

So how far fetched is it that there could have been a Mauser? 3 different cops said they saw a Mauser. 2 changed their story. The 1 who didn't was fired. Seriously... How much more evidence do people need in order to see the fuckery involved?
« Last Edit: April 19, 2020, 11:37:23 PM by Izraul Hidashi »