Ed Forum & DPF posting activity: Accurate Inaccurate Emphasized Avoided Dropped

[Paul May]

'Preacher' on AMC

Satan is also dead.

My black lab is named Satan. Trust me, he’s alive....and well.

[Bill Chapman]

My black lab is named Satan. Trust me, he’s alive....and well.

You might like this:

OMG
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2080.0.html#new

[John Iacoletti]

John, you and I will never agree on the elements of this case. We have no reason to interact. I no longer will be drawn into 50+ year old debates. I believe the WC came to the right conclusion. You do not. Our big difference? I’ve mellowed over the years. You John, are still “in your face”. That’s so unpleasant. Good luck to you.

I’m not any more “in your face” than you are. I’m just pointing out that everything you say about the beliefs of conspiracy theorists applies equally to your beliefs as well.

Good day.

[Bill Chapman]

To each his own

[Paul May]

I’m not any more “in your face” than you are. I’m just pointing out that everything you say about the beliefs of conspiracy theorists applies equally to your beliefs as well.

Good day.

Actually, the LN beliefs to a large degree are held by all LN’s. Oswald did the dirty deed. No conspiracy. I, as previously stated hold open the possibility of a conspiracy although it has never been proven and likely never will be. Put 10 CT’s into a room and you’ll have 10 people who disagree entirely on what happened that day. No solidarity at all after 56 years. Remarkable.

[John Iacoletti]

Actually, the LN beliefs to a large degree are held by all LN’s. Oswald did the dirty deed. No conspiracy.

I know. That doesn’t make it any more likely to be true. They have a holy book to point to.

Put 10 CT’s into a room and you’ll have 10 people who disagree entirely on what happened that day. No solidarity at all after 56 years.

I know that too. But that doesn’t make any one of them more likely to be wrong. Marching in lock-step on faith is not a virtue if it’s the truth you are seeking. You have to evaluate each claim on its merits.

[Bill Chapman]

Someone just announced:
'You have to evaluate each claim on its merits'
------------------------------------------------------

> No fact is relevant in itself; it is relevant only in relation to another fact.