Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

[Ray Mitcham]

Like I say, Ray, you're getting at something specific with that question. Why not cut to the chase and share it in the original question?

The area has been "blacked" in.

[John Anderson]

How do you explain the solid black hair at the back of the head, John?

Well it's definitely not the entry wound in his back.

[Bill Chapman]

How do you explain the solid black hair at the back of the head, John?

The back of JFK's head is in shadow.
 
Simply not enough light in that area of the head to reveal hair.



Closest I could (quickly) find to similar lighting and head angle

[Ray Mitcham]

The back of JFK's head is in shadow.
 
Simply not enough light in that area of the head to reveal hair.



Closest I could (quickly) find to similar lighting and head angle

This is the official back of the head photo, black area bucket filled.



Try the same with your back of the head photo, Bill, and see the difference.

[Ray Mitcham]

I see Ray is persisting with this zany claim, so here's something to consider ...

David Von Pein

Also this morph-animation shows detail in the "blacked out" area.

John Mytton

 

Ray has bucket fulled the one photo where the back of the head area is most compromised by flash shadow and the surface being oblique.

This one of  the photos Mytton included in his gif.

Note the "filled in hair" at the back of the head. No flash problem here.

[Tim Nickerson]

This one of  the photos Mytton included in his gif.

Note the "filled in hair" at the back of the head. No flash problem here.

Ray, what are you talking about?

[Gary Craig]

The same missile wound expert who reported that there was only one entry wound in the back of the skull and that the wound was slightly above the EOP and 2.5 cms to the right of the midline. Deal with it.


They have everything to do with what we were discussing before you decided to divert away.

~snip~

Excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no.

Bottom line, the description of the location of the hole in JFK's back was changed in the final draft of the

WCR to accommodate Arlen Spector's theory about a Magic Bullet causing seven wounds in JFK & JBC.

When public criticism of the WC caused the government to re-examine the autopsy photos , x-rays etc,

a photo of JFK's right lung and chest cavity, that would have showed the direction and path of that missile,

was nowhere to be found.

The same criticism noted the entry point low on the back of JFK's skull, from a bullet fired from the

6th floor SE corner TSBD, doesn't jibe with the official account of the damage. Another

government re-examination of the autopsy materials found the photos of the hole in JFK's skull at the

EOP were not in the archive. Those photos, of the inside and outside of the skull bone,

where the bullet entered, were taken specifically to show cratering.

Cratering indicates the direction the missile was fired from.

Not long after, the Clark Panel decided the original autopsy had got it wrong. It determined the photos and

x-rays show the entry point was 4 inches higher, at the cowlick. The x-rays show a trail of metal

particles high on JFK's skull. Caused, apparently, by the path of a disintegrating projectile.

Two seperate government investigations, two seperate wounds to JFK's head.

Deal with it.


"They have everything to do with what we were discussing before you decided to divert away.

~snip~

Excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no."

LOL