Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy  (Read 233365 times)

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994



And there we have it. Instead of determining the location of a wound by looking at a photograph folks just want to argue about where it might have been and conclude the photo is fake if it doesn't fit their narrative.

How do you explain the solid black hair at the back of the head, John?

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Thank you for all your posts but for me the significant evidence points to the following shots being fired on 11/22.  Please can people let me know what hey think of the points below?  I'm not considering the order of shots at the moment just the wounds, bullet damage, bullet find and fragments found.  The statements below have been developed from the higher quality evidence cited on this post by people.

1 - JFK's back passing through right lung and through Connally shattering his wrist - from behind (missing autopsy photos)

2 - JFK's throat entrance with no exit fired from front through windshield

3 - JFK head shot, hollow tipped round from the front - quite possibly even 2 head shots

4 - Connally's left knee from front ricochet off limo windscreen chrome surround from the front.  Leaves fragments in front footwells of limo and under jump seat.

5 - Miss from behind hit kerb resulting in debris causing Tagues minor injury

6 - Plant at Parkland before plotters aware of Tague's injury.

What do you think?  LNers need not apply as I've heard it all before!!

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Correct

Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken.

They never disappeared because they never existed in the first place. However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:

~snip~

Now, excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no.

"Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken."

Right, the POTUS is assassinated.

The fatal wound(s) are to his head.

The missile wound expert at the autopsy requests photos be taken of the fatal wound(s).

The person taking the photos doesn't take the photos?

Come on now, I was born at night, but it wasn't last night.

"They never disappeared because they never existed in the first place."

LOL

"However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:"

So what?

They have nothing to do with the photos Finck had taken of the underlining bone.

They showed the cratering that indicated the direction the bullet came from.

« Last Edit: March 04, 2018, 03:16:08 PM by Gary Craig »

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994


Maybe some context and explain what you're getting at?

Sorry that you can't follow, Jerry.  What causes the solid black area at the back of the head (as shown by yellow arrow)?


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
"Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken."

Right, the POTUS is assassinated.

The fatal wound(s) are to his head.

The missile wound expert at the autopsy requests photos be taken of the fatal wound(s).


The same missile wound expert who reported that there was only one entry wound in the back of the skull and that the wound was slightly above the EOP and 2.5 cms to the right of the midline. Deal with it.


Quote
"However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:"

So what?

They have nothing to do with the photos Finck had taken of the underlining bone.


They have everything to do with what we were discussing before you decided to divert away.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,233.msg7125.html#msg7125





Excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no.



Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
The area is oblique and receiving less direct light.

Now what are you getting at?
"The area is oblique and receiving less direct light."   :)

Not very good at understanding photos, are you, Jerry.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109