Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

[Lee Wotton]

The shots in no particular order:

- JFK's back passing through right lung and through Connally shattering his wrist - from behind

- JFK's throat entrance with no exit fired from front through windshield

- JFK head shot, hollow tipped round from the front

- Connally's left knee from front ricochet off limo windscreen chrome surround from the front.  Leaves fragments in front footwells of limo and under jump seat.

- Miss from behind hit kerb resulting in debris causing Tagues minor injury

- Plant at Parkland before plotters aware of Tague's injury.

What do you think?  LNers need not apply as I've heard it all before!!

[Tim Nickerson]

C7 sounds pretty good.

Sounds good to me too. Who could have ever thought that Ray would eventually see the light?

[Tim Nickerson]

Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung.
The one Humes testified was taken.

"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission
that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."

"There may be a photo missing" is not the same thing as "there is a photo missing".

"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that]
we don't have."[/i]

Highlight the part of Humes' testimony in which he refers to the existence of a photo that is currently missing.

 

[Tim Nickerson]

Did Connallys acket and shirt temporarily detach from their collars and bunch down?  Maybe a magic jacket and shirt??

Lee, what are you talking about?

[Gary Craig]

"There may be a photo missing" is not the same thing as "there is a photo missing".


Highlight the part of Humes' testimony in which he refers to the existence of a photo that is currently missing.

 

The document from November 1966 says one thing.

Finck's after action report and Clark's taped phone call from January 1967 say something else.

Finck notes in his after action report that photos of the EOP wound in JFK's head, outside shot and inside

shot, which he requested be made, are not among the autopsy photos.

Odd don't you think that photos of the 2 wounds that were moved around are missing?

But you're Egyptian so that won't matter to you. You spend a lot of time in de-Nile.

[Tim Nickerson]

The document from November 1966 says one thing.

Finck's after action report and Clark's taped phone call from January 1967 say something else.

Finck notes in his after action report that photos of the EOP wound in JFK's head, outside shot and inside

shot, which he requested be made, are not among the autopsy photos.

Odd don't you think that photos of the 2 wounds that were moved around are missing?

But you're Egyptian so that won't matter to you. You spend a lot of time in de-Nile.

I'm not familiar with Finck's after action report. If photos that he requested be made are not among the existing photos then either the photos were never taken or ,if they were, they never turned out.

[John Iacoletti]

You kooks keep on ignoring the fact that the Parkland doctors did not see JFK's back and therefore did not see the neck/back entry wound.

Speaking for the doctors now, are you?