Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy  (Read 233345 times)

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #189 on: February 26, 2018, 04:20:55 PM »
Does Bennett mean the shoulder line?


Brainless question
Quote
C7 sounds pretty good.
At least we agree on something.

Quote

Not buying the bunching stuff?
Brainless question.
Quote
If Robinson meant the shoulder line, OK. If he meant below the shoulder body mass, then there's a problem.

Why wouldn't he have said below the shoulder body mass?

Quote
The wound occurred near the boundary of different body masses and people use the terms shoulder, neck and back interchangeably.


Nice graphics, Jerry. Pity they are immaterial.
Quote
Diana Bowron didn't mention the back wound in her WC testimony or contemporaneous newspaper articles.

She was talking about how she saw the body in the car in her WC testimony.

Quote
That she "remembered" it nearly two decades later with the assistance of kook Livingstone and an autopsy photo of the back--and then claimed the photo was wrong--suggests arm-twisting.
Just your opinion.
Quote
Neckline? Is that the hairline?

Another brainless question
Quote
Are they talking about the shoulder line? Or below the shoulder mass? The critics never bother to figure it out. As long as it sounds like it's real low, so they just brainlessly go with it.
You mean the same brainless way you accept the Specter's single bullet theory?
Quote

If you can show a good-resolution picture (that excludes the Willis and Betzner photos) from the motorcade showing clearly the nape area of the jacket that doesn't show a bunch, be my guest.

If you can show a good resolution photo of JFK's shirt bunching up whilst he was in the limo,  be my guest.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #190 on: February 26, 2018, 05:26:17 PM »
Problem is the wound wasn't dissected at the original autopsy. In fact they initially missed the wound

in the front of JFK's throat.

And, as Clark explained to LBJ in this 1-21-67 recorded phone call, the autopsy photo that would have

shown the direction and path of the bullet was missing.

Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung.
The one Humes testified was taken.


http://www.jfklancer.com/Clark.LBJ.html

Date: 1-21-67 12:00 Noon

Time: 7 mins 25 secs at the end of a 8 mins 31 secs conversation

Phone Conversation between Acting Attorney General Ramsey Clark and President Lyndon Johnson
Re: Autopsy Photos

-snip-

"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission
that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."

-snip-

"It could be contended that that photo could show the course and direction the bullet that entered the lower part of the
neck and exited the front part."

-snip-

"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that]
we don't have."


-snip-


You kooks keep on ignoring the fact that the Parkland doctors did not see JFK's back and therefore did not see the neck/back entry wound. Therefore they initially (and prematurely, as it turned out) announced that the frontal throat wound was one of entry. 

They weren't doing any damn autopsy, they were entirely focussed on reviving the POTUS.
« Last Edit: February 26, 2018, 05:29:30 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #191 on: February 26, 2018, 05:51:09 PM »
You kooks keep on ignoring the fact that the Parkland doctors did not see JFK's back and therefore did not see the neck/back entry wound. Therefore they initially (and prematurely, as it turned out) announced that the frontal throat wound was one of entry. 

They weren't doing any damn autopsy, they were entirely focussed on reviving the POTUS.

I'm guessing they wouldn't have connected the 2 wounds without dissecting the bullet track like the

autopsy Dr.'s did.

And how would seeing the back wound change the appearance of the entrance wound in the front of JFK's

throat?

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #192 on: February 26, 2018, 07:04:09 PM »
You should try to be more specific Lee. I assume that you are referring to the hole in the shirt being 5 inches below the top of the collar. The hole in the shirt lined up with the hole in the jacket . Photos of JFK in the limo show that the jacket had bunched up. Since the hole in the shirt lined up with the hole in the jacket, that means that the shirt had bunched up as well.

I did and I clicked on the link. It seems that, if you actually read the article there,  you never understood the content within it. Pamela Brown put to rest the claim that the windshield had a hole in it.

If you are asking me whether I agree with everything in the 888 page Warren Report, then the answer is No.

Pahahaha you were spot on Ray. Tim was right on cue with the bunched up gag

I did read it plus plenty more regarding limo damage,  why did they take the evidence back to Washington and change the windshield? stone chip or bird shit perhaps?

I asked if you believed everything in the wc about 3 shots and all related accounts pertaining to my op i.e. how they were accounted for ad all injuries, finds, fragments and damage etc?


Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #193 on: February 26, 2018, 07:06:04 PM »
You should try to be more specific Lee. I assume that you are referring to the hole in the shirt being 5 inches below the top of the collar. The hole in the shirt lined up with the hole in the jacket . Photos of JFK in the limo show that the jacket had bunched up. Since the hole in the shirt lined up with the hole in the jacket, that means that the shirt had bunched up as well.

I did and I clicked on the link. It seems that, if you actually read the article there,  you never understood the content within it. Pamela Brown put to rest the claim that the windshield had a hole in it.

If you are asking me whether I agree with everything in the 888 page Warren Report, then the answer is No.

Did Connallys acket and shirt temporarily detach from their collars and bunch down?  Maybe a magic jacket and shirt??

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #194 on: February 26, 2018, 07:08:04 PM »
Don't tell me he's one of those tits who wants it to be "proven" that the shirt was bunched up.



Nice surname Jerry suits you.

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #195 on: February 26, 2018, 07:18:21 PM »
I'm guessing they wouldn't have connected the 2 wounds without dissecting the bullet track like the

autopsy Dr.'s did.

And how would seeing the back wound change the appearance of the entrance wound in the front of JFK's

throat?

Exactly Gary.  I notice how no LNer can comment on the missing photo of JFKs upper right lung!!  Because the back shot exting there hit connally.  This complies with the laws of physics and the rounds fired.  There was no entrance wound that could possibly have come out the front of his throat as the throat wound was an entrance wound.

They planted the Parkland bullt before they knew about Tague and messed the whole deal up hence the magic bullet fantasy that the LNers lap up.