56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.  (Read 30659 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2019, 03:48:51 PM »
All of the physical evidence that exists points to Oswald and no one else.  No physical evidence exists which points to anyone other than Oswald.

What little physical evidence there is, is all questionable or tainted in some way. Which is why the “Oswald did it” evangelists either refuse to enumerate it at all or they misrepresent it.

Offline Jim Brunsman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2019, 04:50:10 PM »
Actually, there's plenty of proof from the autopsy that Oswald could not possibly have acted alone. Witnesses describe Humes probing the back wound and finding no exit. That alone kills the lone nut scenario. Ask the Parkland and Bethesda witnesses where the head wound was. If the shooter from behind hit the president's head, we would see a violent motion forward, right? Instead, all the films show a violent "back and to the left" motion and a wound in the lower right portion of the President's head. That is totally incompatible with a head shot from behind. Sorry lone nutters, but if Oswald was the assassin, all the facts would come together easily. Instead, we have evidence of multiple shooters and trying to force Arlen Specter's boneheaded theory into the history books is an atrocity. The truth is much more complex. The fact that the real killers escaped is hard to accept. But these were professional killers who had a plan and executed it very well.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2019, 05:16:23 PM »
Actually, there's plenty of proof from the autopsy that Oswald could not possibly have acted alone. Witnesses describe Humes probing the back wound and finding no exit. That alone kills the lone nut scenario. Ask the Parkland and Bethesda witnesses where the head wound was. If the shooter from behind hit the president's head, we would see a violent motion forward, right? Instead, all the films show a violent "back and to the left" motion and a wound in the lower right portion of the President's head. That is totally incompatible with a head shot from behind. Sorry lone nutters, but if Oswald was the assassin, all the facts would come together easily. Instead, we have evidence of multiple shooters and trying to force Arlen Specter's boneheaded theory into the history books is an atrocity. The truth is much more complex. The fact that the real killers escaped is hard to accept. But these were professional killers who had a plan and executed it very well.

Actually Jim, Kennedy's head initially moves forward and away from Oswald's rifle.

JohnM

Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2019, 05:28:10 PM »
All of the physical evidence that exists points to Oswald and no one else.  No physical evidence exists which points to anyone other than Oswald.

That's what it's supposed to do, Bill. Surely you didn't think the government was going to publish anything other than what they did when they all had their marching orders? Duh!

Here's one of my all-time favorite photos. The official investigation has begun. Investigators have marked the Kennedy stand-in's back and we're in Dealey Plaza to boot. The marks on the back are based on the measurements from the official autopsy and all are very accurate.

I would love to have been a fly on the wall during this reenactment listening in:

GMan 1: "How in the hell was that back shot [which was a shallow wound and no through and through exit per the autopsy] supposed to come out his neck like we got it marked here?"

GMan 2: "Beats me."

LOLOLOL!

But of course you and others, Bill, will continue to keep that old wool over your eyes because...why? Most probably because you simply don't like the Kennedys. It's the old bias, Bill. LOLOLOL!



Offline Jim Brunsman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2019, 06:21:52 PM »
The head moves forward so slightly, you can barely detect it. Why are you ignoring the much more violent "back and to the left" motion? If Oswald is the sole assassin, why isn't there any evidence of a frontal exit on JFK's body?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #12 on: November 22, 2019, 06:29:56 PM »
Oswald: I'm innocent.
JudgeJohnny: Okay, you can go, my darling.
Oswald: Well, that's it... it's all over now.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2019, 06:31:58 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #13 on: November 22, 2019, 06:59:49 PM »
That's what it's supposed to do, Bill. Surely you didn't think the government was going to publish anything other than what they did when they all had their marching orders? Duh!

Here's one of my all-time favorite photos. The official investigation has begun. Investigators have marked the Kennedy stand-in's back and we're in Dealey Plaza to boot. The marks on the back are based on the measurements from the official autopsy and all are very accurate.

I would love to have been a fly on the wall during this reenactment listening in:

GMan 1: "How in the hell was that back shot [which was a shallow wound and no through and through exit per the autopsy] supposed to come out his neck like we got it marked here?"

GMan 2: "Beats me."

LOLOLOL!

But of course you and others, Bill, will continue to keep that old wool over your eyes because...why? Most probably because you simply don't like the Kennedys. It's the old bias, Bill. LOLOLOL!



You lot are much more likely to harbour dislike for the Kennedy's, given your rabid support for the only man on the face of the planet known to have been Johnny-on-the-spot at both murder scenes.  It boggles the mind that that fact would not give one pause.

Oh, wait..
« Last Edit: November 22, 2019, 07:06:11 PM by Bill Chapman »