56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.

[Jack Trojan]

Here we are 56 years later and we still have no idea who was behind the conspiracy, so far it could be The Dallas Police or Hoover or The CIA or some sort of rogue element or the military or basically anybody but Oswald, but why is no one bright enough to figure this out, surely with the thousands of enthusiasts someone has to stumble into some solid evidence, where is it?
Why has nobody even come close to exposing any conspiracy, is it because it was Oswald and all the evidence just fits?
Anyway, if someone knows something and can back this up with proof then let's hear it, or otherwise your time is running out and I'm afraid without some decent evidence history will forever find Oswald guilty of killing two men. That's just how it works.

JohnM

As usual, John Iacoletti is spot on. If LHO was a LN assassin then surely there would be a smoking gun by now, so where is it? Instead there's a crapload of contradictions, excuses and cover ups. For example, I asked you in another thread, which as usual you conveniently ignored, who gave JFK a haircut during the autopsy?





Mytton tell me why we are looking at the same person in your 2 morphs.

[Jack Trojan]

Horseshit! 



No fricken way is that JFK! Any barber will tell you that.

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald: I'm innocent.
JudgeJohnny: Okay, you can go, my darling.
Oswald: Well, that's it... it's all over now.

Never gets old.

Judge Billy: what evidence do you have that Oswald killed Kennedy.
Prosecutor: <crickets>
Judge Billy: I don’t care, because I’m 100% sure he probably did it.

[John Iacoletti]

You lot are much more likely to harbour dislike for the Kennedy's, given your rabid support for the only man on the face of the planet known to have been Johnny-on-the-spot at both murder scenes.  It boggles the mind that that fact would not give one pause.

“Known to have been”. LOL.

[John Mytton]

"Autopsy Haircut" 

Long on top

Short at back

Agreed, Kennedy had longer hair on top, which is just wet in the back of head shot, I think it's been so long since these guys have had hair they forget what happens when it gets wet..
And it seems that the photos either represent one man with a haircut or two dead men, why use two men, WHY?

JohnM

[Jack Trojan]

Agreed, Kennedy had longer hair on top, which is just wet in the back of head shot, I think it's been so long since these guys have had hair they forget what happens when it gets wet..
And it seems that the photos either represent one man with a haircut or two dead men, why use two men, WHY?

JohnM

Wet hair somehow shortens it?  Have another look then fade away gracefully. You lose, loser.

[Walt Cakebread]

Here we are 56 years later and we still have no idea who was behind the conspiracy, so far it could be The Dallas Police or Hoover or The CIA or some sort of rogue element or the military or basically anybody but Oswald, but why is no one bright enough to figure this out, surely with the thousands of enthusiasts someone has to stumble into some solid evidence, where is it?
Why has nobody even come close to exposing any conspiracy, is it because it was Oswald and all the evidence just fits?
Anyway, if someone knows something and can back this up with proof then let's hear it, or otherwise your time is running out and I'm afraid without some decent evidence history will forever find Oswald guilty of killing two men. That's just how it works.

JohnM

Here we are 56 years later and we still have no idea who was behind the conspiracy,

If you don't know...It's because you don't want to know...      There's a mountain of evidence that illuminates the truth, but you prefer to remain in the dark.