False Witness

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: False Witness  (Read 37399 times)

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1214
Re: False Witness
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2019, 02:07:34 PM »
In my opinion, Oliver Stone’s film “JFK” has more in common with Milos Foreman’s film “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” than the JFK assassination. I have wondered if Oliver Stone has read Patricia Lambert’s book “False Witness.”

I am in the process of writing a letter to Ken Burns requesting that he consider producing a new documentary about the Garrison investigation and recommending Patricia Lambert’s excellent book as a reference. I think that his work would reach a much larger audience than the book. And I believe that would be a good “antidote” to Oliver Stone’s film “JFK.”  He is very busy though, and I think that additional similar requests might help the chances of this becoming a reality. So please consider making your own request to Ken Burns. The address is:

Florentine Films
PO Box 613
Walpole, NH 03608

I am wondering if your opinion of author Lambert and her book, "False Witness," flies in the face of the facts...

Quote
https://web.archive.org/web/20161103035104/tomscully.com/node/17
Has Everyone Sold Out? More Questions than Answers About George White and James Phelan, et al

Submitted by Tom Scully on Sun, 01/17/2016 - 02:19
.....
Quote
http://articles.latimes.com/1997/sep/10/news/mn-30846
James Phelan; Investigative Reporter, Author
September 10, 1997
....
"He was a dying breed," writer Patricia Lambert, a close friend, ... "The world is a sadder, barren place" without him.
..........

Cliff Notes version: The belief systems of both LNs and CTs are unresponsive to the actual evidence. No one even wants to discuss this entirely reasonable conclusion despite the actual facts. And you certainly do not want to discuss or even evaluate these underpinnings of your own belief system. You are typical and no serious inquiry/evaluation can take place, so any further progress is highly unlikely.
…….
IOW, Garrison may have been investigating something, and Clay Shaw may have been a defendant, but neither, when you actually look under the hood, actually acted their part.

Quote
Posted by (The late, perceptive) Thomas H. Purvis  July 19, 2013

.....The "power structure" within New Orleans lies not with those who are currently in what is some temporary political position.

It lies with those who possess the capability to place these persons in the various political positions.

Therefore, Jim Garrison, not unlike any other political figure in New Orleans, did what he was instructed to do or else he suffered the consequences....

« Last Edit: October 03, 2019, 02:21:03 PM by Tom Scully »

Offline Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
Re: False Witness
« Reply #22 on: October 03, 2019, 02:11:46 PM »
Presumably from alligator and snake country.....a Moot point?

Clinton almost impeached for one and now Trump for Whistle blow job.
Not to be too pedantic but Clinton was impeached. The House of Representatives impeaches - that is, brings up charges that are deemed worthy of removal; that is indicts the person - and the Senate then has a trial over those charges. Andrew Johnson was the other president to be impeached. But like Clinton he was acquitted by the Senate (by one vote).

Most people think the same will happen here since the Republicans control the Senate and it will be difficult to find the 20 or votes needed to convict (conviction requires 2/3s vote).

The country doesn't need this but democracy is never going to be pretty (Brexit anyone?). As the saying goes, fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a bumpy flight.

« Last Edit: October 03, 2019, 02:24:23 PM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: False Witness
« Reply #23 on: October 03, 2019, 02:22:44 PM »
Not to be too pedantic but Clinton was impeached. The House of Representatives impeaches - that is, brings up charges that are deemed worthy of removal; that is indicts the person - and the Senate then has a trial over those charges. Andrew Johnson was the other president to be impeached. But like Clinton he was acquitted by the Senate (by one vote).

Most people think the same will happen hear since the Republicans control the Senate and it will be difficult to find 20 votes to convict (conviction requires 2/3s vote).

Thanks for correcting me Steve, I should have researched and not relied on memory......not sure what is the scarier outcome in this instance.

Offline Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
Re: False Witness
« Reply #24 on: October 03, 2019, 02:29:36 PM »
Thanks for correcting me Steve, I should have researched and not relied on memory......not sure what is the scarier outcome in this instance.
No problem, many Americans - even reporters - make the same mistake all of the time. It's an odd word to use - impeachment - when it's really just indictment.

The scariest for me is that he's convicted and then runs for the Presidency again and is elected. The Senate can disqualify an officer (President, Judge) from holding future office; so we may see them try to do this (swell).

The Founders were brilliant men (yes, they compromised over the evil of slavery but what was the alternative at that time?) but would be perplexed at how to handle constitutionally someone like Trump. He's clearly unsuited for office, is a disgrace, a narcissitic thug, but I'm not quite persuaded that his acts warrant removal. I'd like him out of office but I want to do so in a fair manner. His supporters are wrong; but they're Americans too who have a voice in this.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2019, 02:37:31 PM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1214
Re: False Witness
« Reply #25 on: October 03, 2019, 02:38:56 PM »
Thanks for correcting me Steve, I should have researched and not relied on memory......not sure what is the scarier outcome in this instance.

Colin, an opportunity has presented itself here to have a facts supported discussion centering on Garrison, his investigation, and the money that supported it.
I hope you will participate in your evenhanded, scholarly way I appreciate is unusual around here.

1938... Willard E Robertson was a 30 year old store clerk selling suits adjacent to the Yale Univ. campus in Connecticut.

1944... Willard E Robertson, after brief stints managing a sandwich shop and then a tavern, both adjacent to the Yale Univ. campus in Connecticut,
Robertson was listed in the regional directory employed as a "woodworker" at a defense plant owned by Allen Dulles Princeton, 1914,  classmate, Jack Churchward, located in an adjacent town.

Hypothetically, o'course!.....(Just talking "out of school")

I have always thought. "Follow the Money" was basic, obvious. Oliver Stone spent $43 million, Harold Weissberg authored
book after book. Then came Davy, Mellen, DiEugenio, and Morley. Which of them, if any, delved into the money behind both INCA
and the Garrison investigation and prosecution of Clay Shaw?...
…..

Quote
https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/219917526/
Willard E. Robertson SHREVEPORT Private Kimilv services (or Willord E. Robertson, a recent resident o Shreveport, were held at 11 a m, on Mondav October 31, at the tomilv home Grevstone on Beaver Lake near Rogers, Ark. Mr Robertson died at Ochsner Foundation Hosoitol in New Orleans ot 10 a m on Saturday, October 29. 1983, (oliowingashort Illness Interment will be in the family mausoleum. Mr. Robertson, born on May 16, 1908 in Conwov, NH, was a well-known business and civic leader in Shreveport as well as in Rogers, Ark. and New Orleans, La. He was educated in Exeter, N.H. and Northeast University of Low in Boston, Mass. Mr. Robertson wos assistant to the president ot Church, Ward & Co. in New Haven, Conn. In 1948.



…..


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: False Witness
« Reply #26 on: October 03, 2019, 02:40:01 PM »
No problem, many Americans - even reporters - make the same mistake all of the time. It's an odd word to use - impeachment - when it's really just indictment.

The scariest for me is that he's convicted and then runs for the Presidency again and is elected.

The Founders were brilliant men (yes, they compromised over the evil of slavery but what was the alternative at that time?) but would be perplexed at how to handle constitutionally someone like Trump. He's clearly unsuited for office, is a disgrace, a narcissitic thug, but I'm not quite persuaded that his acts warrant removal. I'd like him out of office but I want to do so in a fair manner. His supporters are wrong; but they're Americans too who have a voice in this.

Looking from afar I wonder how you go from "ask not what your country...." and "we choose to go to the moon..." to the self serving gibberish of the present occupant? As an Australian I apologise for the influence of Rupert on all of us.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: False Witness
« Reply #27 on: October 03, 2019, 02:42:28 PM »
Colin, an opportunity has presented itself here to have a facts supported discussion centering on Garrison, his investigation, and the money that supported it.
I hope you will participate in your evenhanded, scholarly way I appreciate is unusual around here.

1938... Willard E Robertson was a 30 year old store clerk selling suits adjacent to the Yale Univ. campus in Connecticut.

1944... Willard E Robertson, after brief stints managing a sandwich shop and then a tavern, both adjacent to the Yale Univ. campus in Connecticut,
Robertson was listed in the regional directory employed as a "woodworker" at a defense plant owned by Allen Dulles Princeton, 1914,  classmate, Jack Churchward, located in an adjacent town.

Apologies for the derail Tom....I will not comment further in this thread about Trump.