Those Front Steps

[Royell Storing]

The one where Mr Mytton goes into full-on rabbit-in-the-headlights Von Pein mode! 

Now!

We know from Agent Hosty's recently unearthed interrogation notes that Mr Oswald told Captain Fritz
--------------he bought a Coca-Cola in the second floor lunchroom before the motorcade
--------------he went back down to the first floor to eat his lunch
--------------he then "went outside to watch P. parade"



We also know that Captain Fritz and the other cover-up investigators suppressed these claims
--------------they didn't want people knowing about Mr Oswald's claim as to a pre-motorcade visit to the second floor lunchroom because that would have caused people to query the Baker/Truly story
--------------they didn't want people knowing about Mr Oswald's claim to have gone outside to watch the Presidential parade because that would have caused people to ask awkward questions about just who exactly was in that entranceway at the time of the shots.

Now!

We also have this exchange with a press reporter:

"Did you shoot the President?"
"I work in that building."
"Were you in the building at the time?"
"Naturally if I work in that building, yes sir."

There is literally only one place that can be said to be both part of the Depository building and outside: the covered front entranceway.

Mr Oswald has told us exactly where he was at the time of the assassination, and the Wiegman film proves he is telling the truth:



Not a blessed thing poor Mr Mytton can do about it! 

He and his Warren Gullible goons can, however, console themselves that they have nearly gotten Mr Oswald's whereabouts right all these years:
-------Correct city? Check! 
-------Correct street? Check! 
-------Correct building? Check! 
-------Correct floor? A minor adjustment needed here, but not enough to make any significant difference! 

    Why are you assuming that someone in handcuffs is Truthfully answering questions? This same person also had a False ID in his pocket and a Hand Gun when apprehended. Father Flanagan ain't got nothin' on you.   

[Alan Ford]

    Why are you assuming that someone in handcuffs is Truthfully answering questions? This same person also had a False ID in his pocket and a Hand Gun when apprehended. Father Flanagan ain't got nothin' on you.

1. We know that those present at Mr Oswald's interrogation lied about his claimed whereabouts just before and at the time of the shooting.

2. Mr Oswald's claimed whereabouts at the time of the shooting are verified by the Wiegman film.

3. We're still waiting for you--------or anyone else--------to offer a non-Oswald-related explanation for the doctoring of the Wiegman film that put an impossible 'shadow' on Mr Lovelady.

 

[Royell Storing]

1. We know that those present at Mr Oswald's interrogation lied about his claimed whereabouts just before and at the time of the shooting.

2. Mr Oswald's claimed whereabouts at the time of the shooting are verified by the Wiegman film.

3. We're still waiting for you--------or anyone else--------to offer a non-Oswald-related explanation for the doctoring of the Wiegman film that put an impossible 'shadow' on Mr Lovelady.

 

    (1) Why is Little Lord Fauntleroy carrying a Fake ID?

    (2) Why is Little Lord Fauntleroy carrying a Hand Gun?

    (3) You have NOT Proven 1 of those heads belongs to Oswald.

[Alan Ford]

    (1) Why is Little Lord Fauntleroy carrying a Fake ID?

    (2) Why is Little Lord Fauntleroy carrying a Hand Gun?

    (3) You have NOT Proven 1 of those heads belongs to Oswald.

Mr Storing, I shall deal with your one point above that is on-topic---------------Point #3.

Have I proven to your satisfaction that the Wiegman film frames have been doctored to put fake shadow down Mr Lovelady's side?

 

[Alan Ford]

Look at what happens to the car aerial when it meets the Lovelady 'shadow':

Friends, what a truly remarkable shadow this shadow down Mr Lovelady's side in Wiegman is!

1. It falls on a man standing in direct sunlight...



2. It has the uncanny property of temporarily magicking away a car aerial that is between the camera and it...



Ain't no natural shadow, people!

Ain't there for no reason either!

And ain't wholly unrelated to the second 'Lovelady' head in these same frames neither!

[Royell Storing]

Mr Storing, I shall deal with your one point above that is on-topic---------------Point #3.

Have I proven to your satisfaction that the Wiegman film frames have been doctored to put fake shadow down Mr Lovelady's side?

 

     You Failed to deal with my Point #3. Asking a question "deals" with Nothing. You have been hanging around Mytton too long.

[Alan Ford]

     You Failed to deal with my Point #3. Asking a question "deals" with Nothing. You have been hanging around Mytton too long.

Oh but I am dealing with your Point #3, Mr Storing! You say I haven't proved that that's Mr Oswald behind Mr Lovelady. I draw your attention to the fact that my proof involves the magic 'shadow' down Mr Lovelady, which you seem to accept is not a natural phenomenon.

So we at least agree that Wiegman has been tampered with, yes?

Well then! I have submitted that the only rational explanation for such tampering is that Mr Oswald's presence is being hidden. The second 'Lovelady' head seals that deal.

You disagree? Then it's over to you to offer an alternative explanation for why Wiegman would have been tampered with in the way demonstrated. As soon as you offer one, we can explore its cogency.

Have you got an alternative explanation for the doctoring of Wiegman or not?