Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 174

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 405585 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #784 on: December 04, 2019, 03:05:24 AM »
Quote from: John Mytton on December 04, 2019, 03:03:20 AM
On tiptoe!?? Fkn Hilarious, what a brilliant comedian!
Like I said, you suck at this!

JohnM

Temper, Mr Mytton!  :D

Why, pray, can Mr Lovelady not be on tiptoe?

Why can he not be leaning?

 Thumb1:
Logged

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #785 on: December 04, 2019, 03:12:58 AM »
Quote from: Alan Ford on December 04, 2019, 03:05:24 AM
Temper, Mr Mytton!  :D

Why, pray, can Mr Lovelady not be on tiptoe?

Why can he not be leaning?

 Thumb1:

Quote
Temper, Mr Mytton! 

I'm too busy laughing at you to even remotely have a Temper.

Quote
Why, pray, can Mr Lovelady not be on tiptoe?

Whatever it takes, eh Alan?

Quote
Why can he not be leaning?

Well duh, I proved he leaned forward, pay attention.

JohnM
Logged

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #786 on: December 04, 2019, 03:20:08 AM »
Quote from: Alan Ford on December 03, 2019, 05:34:23 PM

There is simply no "physical" way that this shadowline can be reconciled with the 'shadow' down Mr Lovelady in the Wiegman film:


Ladies and Gentlemen, this is what amounts to the total of Ford's proof, a claim of what he thinks he sees, but where is the "physical" evidence to support this claim?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and so far the only evidence has been from me!



JohnM
Logged

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #787 on: December 04, 2019, 03:23:16 AM »
Quote from: John Mytton on December 04, 2019, 03:20:08 AM
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is what amounts to the total of Ford's proof, a claim of what he thinks he sees, but where is the "physical" evidence to support this claim?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and so far the only evidence has been from me!



JohnM

(~Snicker~)

And the depth of the doorway in 1963 vs today, Mr Mytton?

Remember, this is what you posted in a rush of Lone Nutter euphoria:



 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: December 04, 2019, 03:24:54 AM by Alan Ford »
Logged

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #788 on: December 04, 2019, 03:32:32 AM »
Quote from: Alan Ford on December 04, 2019, 03:23:16 AM
(~Snicker~)

And the depth of the doorway in 1963 vs today, Mr Mytton?

Remember, this is what you posted in a rush of Lone Nutter euphoria:



 Thumb1:

Since you're obviously a novice and didn't even know they changed the front doors, Doh!
It's a little deeper today than in 1963 but not enough to make a significant difference to my graphic.

JohnM
Logged

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #789 on: December 04, 2019, 03:34:53 AM »
Quote from: John Mytton on December 04, 2019, 03:32:32 AM
Since you're obviously a novice and didn't even know they changed the front doors, Doh!
It's a little deeper today than in 1963 but not enough to make a significant difference to my graphic.

JohnM

It's "a little deeper", is it, Mr Mytton?  :D :D :D

Suggestion for you! Why don't you go away and actually find out how much deeper it actually is, then come back to us with a Soopah-Doopah-3D-GIF proving it makes no significant difference to your graphic?



 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: December 04, 2019, 03:37:26 AM by Alan Ford »
Logged

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2137
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #790 on: December 04, 2019, 04:01:54 AM »
115 pages? Can somebody give me the Reader's Digest version of this thread?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 174
« previous next »