Those Front Steps

[John Iacoletti]

There's movement in the window in the Robert Hughes film.

“Movement”, LOL.

If “movement” = Oswald, then Oswald is all over the front steps.

[Royell Storing]

In the following image from the NBC archives, the shadowed areas don't look identical, what do you think you see and then tell me what this has to do with the shadow on Lovelady?
Btw some videos out there have had their contrast either lowed or raised to bring out or hide certain details, I absolutely hate that people like you who have zero understanding have done such critical damage to the historical record, so I also have to deal with you and your buddies stuffing up these very important images, thanks for nothing, next time think before you act!



JohnM

    Plain and Simple, (1) YOU stated this was a Rush Job to get it on the air, and (2) YOU pulled it off of YouTube = Exceptionally BAD Resolution. This is why the inside of the Car and The Steps/Landing area are identically JET BLACK. Bad + Bad = BAD

[Alan Ford]

Mr Mytton, can you confirm that the source for the Wiegman footage you have been using is in fact a home recording of an NBC broadcast from 22 November 1988?

Thank you!

Mytton Fails So Far!

1. Lovelady was way to the west of the center railing and so caught natural shadow? ================> EPIC FAIL!

2. Lovelady was several feet back on the landing (maybe bending down to do his laces) and so caught natural shadow? ================>EPIC FAIL!  

3. We have provably original NBC footage whose early broadcast proves there wasn't enough time to alter Wiegman? ================> EPIC FAIL!  

Anyone else want to try offering us a rational counter-explanation for this dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady?



Because if Mr Mytton is the best Team Keep LHO Away From That Entranceway have got, then Team Keep LHO Away From That Entranceway really are well and truly screwed!

 

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Kleinschmidt,

There's movement in the window in the Robert Hughes film.

Must have been an evil, evil, evil CIA guy, huh?

--  MWT 

So you can't see Oswald on the steps and you just admitted that you did not see Oswald anywhere else. 
Thanks, I don't see Oswald in a window or anywhere else either. I always knew he didn't do it, but it just took you some time.
I accept your apologies in advance

[Thomas Graves]

So you can't see Oswald on the steps and you just admitted that you did not see Oswald anywhere else. 
Thanks, I don't see Oswald in a window or anywhere else either. I always knew he didn't do it, but it just took you some time.
I accept your apologies in advance

Kleinschmidt,

Your wellspring of self-delusion is always flowing and evidently bottomless.

You're tapped right into The  River Styx.

Go to The Lethe Pub and Grill and fahgeddaboutit, comrade.

And take your damned Shades with ya.

--  MWT   

[Alan Ford]

Kleinschmidt,

Your wellspring of self-delusion is always flowing and evidently bottomless.

You're tapped right into The Styx.

Go to The Lethe Pub and Grill and fahgeddaboutit, comrade.

And take your damned Shades with ya.

--  MWT   

So Mr Graves can't explain the magic 'shadow' down Mr Lovelady! 

Can anyone?

[Alan Ford]

Reflective Note!

Friends, the reason I am so sure of my ground here is that the discovery of Mr Oswald in Wiegman-------------



------------came after I had tried desperately hard to find an innocent explanation for the 'shadow' on Mr Lovelady in Wiegman:

-------------------------> putting a jacket or coat on him (didn't work)
-------------------------> querying the very identification of Mr Lovelady in Wiegman as Mr Lovelady (didn't work)
-------------------------> querying the identification of Mr Lovelady in the early Hughes frames (didn't work)
-------------------------> trying out different postures for Mr Lovelady in Wiegman (didn't work).

In short, I already went through the same Operation Racking-Of-The-Brains that my opponents in Team Keep LHO Away From That Entranceway are now going through. And I can save them some trouble by telling them now in all candor: this will not end happily for you.

Also worth remembering! I was a strong supporter of the PrayerMan=LHO claim. But this damn 'shadow' kept niggling away at me. It was an annoyance, an irritant, a seeming irrelevance.

The breakthrough--------on 21 October---------of finding the second head behind Mr Lovelady's in Wiegman, however, solved the problem at a stroke. And forced me away from the PrayerMan claim.

I cannot help remarking that the attack line from Team Keep LHO Away From That Entranceway has moved from
a) trying to explain away the shadow
to
b) trying to suggest that darkening a few movie frames would have been a technical impossibility in 1963 (!)

If that's the net yield of Operation Racking-Of-The-Brains-----------an admission of complete perplexity as to this 'shadow'-----------then they really are in very deep trouble.

Because (as they know only too well) if they cannot defeat me on this issue, then the logic of the thing is that they don't just lose this particular argument-------------no, their entire understanding of the case dies a miserable death.

It is important, however, that they know that their defeat is a result not (just...) of their own ineptitude, but of the fact that reality is not on their side.

This holds especially for the Lone Nutters, who need to get their heads around a simple fact:

Mr Oswald did not shoot JFK, period.



You lose. But not nearly as much as he did.